Why didn’t he choose that one? What in her mind made her choose that?
Why does a person act a certain way? For centuries people around the world have tried to figure out why humans make certain decision, especially those that are considered irrational. One answer, prospect theory, tries to explain human behavior in terms of psychology. This theory explains behavior under the condition of uncertainty and that people end up making decision with biases. A particular problem or question can have multiple frames/scenarios, with a person’s actions differing under various manipulations of this same scenario. Having this knowledge that a person will behave a particular way when he or she is presented with a certain form of a scenario can be beneficial. It can help predict how to approach a person, but it can also lead to exploitation by those seeking profit.
Prospect theory can be explained with an example using game and loss scenarios and valence and possession effects. A common example to showcase the theory involves the use of money. Using the game scenario, you have the choice between receiving $20 right now without doing anything or playing a game and possibly winning $50, a form valence. In this type of scenario, on average, a person will choose to take the $20 and not risk losing it. People love certainty and having $20 without taking any risk pleases them enough. However, using a loss scenario, changes the outcome. You are given $50, the potential winnings from the previous frame, and told that you can possibly win this. Then, someone reaches in and takes $30 from you. You are then told that you can take the remaining $20 and go home with it or play the game to win the remaining $30 that was taken from you. Surprisingly, people...
... middle of paper ...
...e received before. Instead of putting more effort on previous papers, we are working more and longer hours to get a higher score on this one in order to improve our overall grade. The possession of higher grades and that being taken away from us lead us to write this essay. Those who already have high grades will probably not do it since the emotional effect of increasing the grade by a few points is not strong enough as the loss of a few points is to make a person perform this action. Overall, decision to avoid a loss will be more aggressive and bolder, compared to achieving a gain. This helps explain sometimes irrational decisions. The theory provides reasoning for all decision that a person can make and is the cause for a lapse in rational thought in many of these decision. Prospect Theory can be applied to literally any decision that a person makes, that is what
Examples in this book can be used in the research paper to help explain why people
There are some human phenomena, which seem to be the result of individual actions and personal decisions. Yet, these phenomena are often - on closer inspection – as much a result of social factors as of psychological ones.
In other words our perception of things is our reality and reality is subjective. This theory also states that with what one individual would call a rational strategy there may be a negative or unwanted outcome. Not all people reach the same goals by the same methods or processes. When coming up with a plan we consider our upcoming actions with decreased knowledge, different mindsets, and reasoning abilities that are not the same as others.
Spokane Industries has contracted Franklin Electronics for an 18 month product development contract. Franklin Electronics is new to using project management methodologies and has not been exposed to earned value management methodologies. Even though Franklin and Spokane have worked together in the past, they have mainly used fixed-price contracts with little to no stipulations. For this project, Spokane Industries is requiring Franklin Electronics to use formalized project management methodologies, earned value cost schedules, and schedules for reports and meetings. Since Franklin Electronics had no experience with earned value management, the cost accounting group was trained in the methodology in order to bid for the project.
What are we as humans far more afraid of free choice or a forced decision? Manipulation and influence are presented in many ways through out the course of this book. This essay will be more of a comparative analysis between two novels The Tragedy Of Macbeth and Paradise Lost. Though influence may be a large section of our lives manipulation is what gets us to do things.
People vary not only in their capability to do but also in their “volition to do”, or motivation. The motivation of people relies on the forces of their motives and these motives are sometimes set as needs, wants, drives, and impulses within the person. Motives are directed toward goals, which may be aware or subconscious; therefore motives are the “reasons” of behavior.
The decision-making model not as simple as selfish or self-interest, it’s the “theory of human choice based on scientific principles of observation and experiment”, but not “postulation and deduction” (page 397). Observation reflects it has been learned or acknowledged from patient look or research about the cause and effect, experiment means it has been thought, be consider the pros and cons. Even though it might not be think over and think through, it must be different than “creating something out of nothing”. There are four princi...
Rational choice theory, developed by Ronald Clarke and Derek Cornish in 1985, is a revival of Cesare Becca...
The second example of when this case study involves the rational choice perspective is when Danny lied to Laura about having the job at GM. Danny used his rational thinking that if he told Laura he had a good job, that she would stay with Danny. Danny was desperate at this point and attempted to make Laura and the children stay. In his mind, he had to lie in order to gain his reward. He believed that the benefit of him saying he had a job would make his marriage
The aim of this essay is to analyse four theoretical approaches to psychology, including psychodynamic, humanistic, cognitive and behavioural. Analysing each approach in detail and identifying key features the approach uses to explain human behaviour. This essay will also analyse how successful each approach is in it methods, evidence gathering techniques and analyse how it can be applied to giving reasons for particular human behaviours. As well as analysing each approaches failings in it theories, methods and evidence gathering techniques.
Rational choice theories not only seek to explain the decisions that some people make, but also to help us to better understand decisions that others don’t make. We therefore have an examination of deterrence theories. Traditionally...
Mcclelland, David C. "Toward a Theory of Motive Acquisition." American Psychologist 20.5 (1965): 321-33. Web.
...ke them do what they really want is to have more money and ended up not thinking about the consequence and that’s all subjective expected utility (SEU) is all about. That is why this theory is a dominant theory because what it based upon people and what they really think about in normal day-to-day challenge or decision making a person makes. When an officer is on duty and there was a robbery going on and people are hurt inside the store and outside who have been shot. They need to quickly decide to whether chase the criminals or aid the civilians who have been wounded by the criminal. The everyday decision sometimes unconsciously decided and not knowing we either we are doing the right thing or just going through the motion of what we are doing. People can die or have the penalty of death if a person chooses the wrong decision and doesn’t know why he or she did it.
This approach to decision-making may be easy for some people and difficult for others. For example, a Christian might use their faith in God and his teachings when reasoning. Expected Utility Theory has been used to explain the process of decision-making. This is the idea that people simply observe the decision, identity the value of each decision and choose the option that will result in the maximum level of the desired outcome. A common explanation for why people sometimes find this approach difficult can be explained by the prospect theory (Kahneman and Tversky). This can be summarised as the belief that people naturally tend to evaluate the psychological aspects of a decision rather than make a quick decision on what is wholly rational. For example, gambling. If someone was offered a role of a dice for anything under a 5 to gain £100, but would lose £50 if it was a 5 or above, people are more likely to turn down the offer as there is a reasonable risk that they may lose their money. This is known as loss aversion. Generally, I don’t think advanced training in areas such as statistics, economics and psychology would help people to make decisions that are more economically rewarding as I believe that autonomy is innate in human beings, therefore, I think people would decide what they truly wish to. However, I do think that people may use this advanced training, when they are
Two psychological theories used for explaining behavior are behaviorism and social learning theory. Although the two both deal with behavior, they focus on slightly unalike components in their efforts to explain why people act the way they do. Behaviorism and social learning theory have convincing sources of support so there is no well-defined response to which one does a superior job at explaining behavior.