Pros And Cons: Should We Stop Testing On Animals?

2093 Words5 Pages

Should we stop tests on animals?

There are many pros and cons to the practice of animal testing. Unfortunately, neither side pleases everyone- including the general public, government and scientists. Animal testing is a process that has been going on for centuries for many different reasons; finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medication. Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer, HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more. Scientists usually use animals for testing purpose because they are considering similar to humans. Animals have their differences, and are also similarities. This is what comparative medicine is about: researches use both similarities and differences to gain insight into the many complex human biological systems.
Which means that feeling may be the last decisive moment in whether a person believes the advantages of animal testing outweigh the problems connected with this practice. Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, and going to circuses and zoos. Many of us bought our favorite “pets” at pet shops, had guinea pigs, and kept beautiful birds in cages. We wore wool and silk, ate at McDonald’s burgers, and fished. We never consider the impact of these action on the animals involved.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is the largest animal rights organization in the world, with more than three million members and supporters. PETA focuses its attention on the four areas in which the largest numbers of animals suffer the most intensely for longest periods of time: on factory farms, in the clothing trade, in laboratories, and in the entertainment industry. They also work on a variety of other issues, including the cruel killing of rodents, birds, and other “pests” as well as cruelty to domesticated

More about Pros And Cons: Should We Stop Testing On Animals?

Open Document