Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
pros and cons of vaccinations
the importance of vaccination for human beings
cons of vaccination
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: pros and cons of vaccinations
In the United States, for many years vaccine was developed to prevent disease such as smallpox and later control the spread of rubella, and polio as well as various diseases. Vaccination as played an intricate role in public health efforts to prevent illness and combat diseases. However, as time changes, so does societal views. Many people have negative assumption about vaccination, and do not view it as a human rights issue, which mandates everyone to be given the same vaccination to prevent sickness and diseases. As a result, countless of people have declined the method of vaccination. Why mothers’ of daughters would refrain their child from receiving the cervical cancer vaccine? Are mothers protecting their daughters or are mothers’ hurting
Why are there so many controversies about a vaccine that should dramatically reduce the prevalent cases of cancer? The Indiana Health study examines, the HPV vaccine had significantly affected those people who are in poverty as well as race disparities. Sadly, African-American and Hispanic women are more probable to cancer. Often times, it is the lack of health awareness and infrequent visits to the doctor due to financial adversities. Nevertheless, one of the ethical questions parents face, is the horrifying fear of condoning sex before marriage or giving their daughters the right to engaged in multiple sex partners. The HPV vaccine also infringes on the parental rights with their daughters because of the ethical principle associated with HPV. Ultimately, parental rights are then left upon the relationship of trust with their daughters to believe that having the HPV vaccination at an early age will not increase the possibility of sex. Many parents who are aware of the HPV vaccine are more reluctant to have their daughters vaccinated. This reluctancy is based on the mothers’ fear of their daughters developing a cervical cancer. In The Journal of Law and Policy, candidate Michele Bachman stated during the 2011 United States presidential debate, “That the vaccine was “dangerous.” She
However, having children vaccinated is vital to the environment and eliminate the numbers of death that is sweeping across our nation. Although, there are many laws in place governing vaccinations for school age children in the United States. Many of these law often restrict girls from becoming vaccinating. Issues ranging from religion, medical, and lack of interest. One law is religion based upon a parent faith, the child may be exempt from receiving the vaccine. This fosters more sickness and diseases. Despite the fact, many states such as Taxes, Washington DC, and New York are creating awareness in preventing cervical cancer in girls. In New York, bill number (1822) was passed in 2008. This bill would encourage parents by providing educational material and consultation to fight against HPV for school age children. In addition, for children born before the year 1996 will be mandated to receive the HPV
Human papilloma virus is today’s most common sexually transmitted infection and reamins uncurable at this time. About 79 million individuals in the United States are currently infected with HPV; around 14 million individuals will become newly infected with HPV each year. As of early 2012, one preventative measure against HPV is a vaccine given in three shots over six months, recommended for both male and female children at the age of 11 or 12. While the HPV vaccine is not mandated at this time, many individuals have openly expressed their opinions about the possibility. A man by the name of Mike Adams wrote an article for the NaturalNews website in February of 2007 titled “HPV Vaccine Texas Tyranny” explaining his apprehensions for the possible mandation of the HPV vaccine. Correspondingly, Arthur Allen wrote “The HPV Debate Needs an Injection of Reality” for the Washington Post in April of 2007 to convey his standpoint on the topic. While both Adams and Allen agree that the HPV vaccination lacks credibility, track record, and substantiation of long term safety, Adams argues that the HPV vaccine should never be mandated, while Allen believes the vaccine could be sucessfully mandated in the future if civic observations advance over time.
He received a tremendous amount of support from several doctors and citizens hoping to prevent cancer growth in their children- the future generation. Several studies have shown that the vaccine itself is harmless, with few reports of mild side effects ( National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, 2015). It would protect the lives of millions of children long before exposure to HPV. Parents who supported governor Rick Perry’s order reinforced the vaccine and the numerous amount of benefits it would provide for young girls and the cost efficiency. HPV vaccines would be available to millions of families in the United States through organizations, such as Vaccines for Children, who provide vaccines at a lower cost, if not free, or coverage by personal insurance (Bassett, 2011). For these parents, the benefits human papillomavirus vaccines have outweighed any risks that may come as a result, and there is nothing wrong about caring for the wellbeing of their daughters. A majority of individuals who support Rick Perry’s decision wholeheartedly believe this is the best option to further protect the lives of those who might affected by the sexually transmitted viruses. However, other people express different opinions and concerns regarding the decision, as expected from a country that allows freedom in beliefs and opinions. It is not to say that one group is right, or one group is wrong, simply that each individual thinks differently and will not always agree on the same
Many people believe that medical decisions for children should be left up to the parents or the child’s legal guardian. “ If the state can tag, track down, and forced citizens against their will to be injected with biological products of known and unknown toxicity today, there will be no limitation which individual freedoms that state can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow.” (Barbara Low Fisher, co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center)
Most people know what vaccines are and have received them during our childhood years; but past that knowledge, most people do not think much about vaccines until we have children of our own. Some parents are more skeptical than others on the topic of vaccinations, but most parents choose this preventative measure in protecting their children from harmful diseases. However, in the case of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, there is quite a controversy as to if it is appropriate to administer the vaccine to pre-teen to teenage children. Genital human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually-transmitted infection in the United States; an estimated 14 million persons are newly infected every year (Satterwhite,
There are numerous of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) that are spread across the United States yearly. According to the Office on Women’s Health, In the United States about 19 million new infections are occurred each year that affects men and women of all backgrounds and economic levels. Though there’s a number of many different STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV) is a most common STI that can develop into 40 different types which can affect the genital area of men and women (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014). Mandating the HPV vaccine for the chance of eliminating cervical cancer is a great idea, however it is not sufficient enough to be positioned as a necessity that would violate individuals’ autonomy as well as penetrating the cost of the vaccination on individuals. Ethics in vaccines can be very delicate being that it often violates one right and/or interfere with philosophical/religious beliefs. There’s has been great controversy in regards to mandating the HPV vaccine and in the midst presenting ethical concerns.
Some of the most fatal and dangerous diseases known to the human race are measles, polio, and diphtheria. Before the 1900s, these diseases caused communities to live in fear as they went about their daily activities. Since then, vaccines have been a solution created to prevent people from acquitting these horrendous sicknesses. “In the 20th and 21st centuries, many people in the United States have not personally encountered some of the diseases that are now vaccine-preventable” (p. 132). However, even with a major advancement in medicine, there are still children all across the United States that are being deprived of life saving vaccinations. The universal vaccination dilemma causes moral principles such as beneficence and justice to be debated continuously in regards to how nurses provide care to patients.
For parents, the responsibility of taking care of a child is their number one priority. They tend to build up a list of what their child needs to stay safe and healthy. Even the smallest way of a taking care of a child is important like putting them in a car seat is one of the ways to keep children protected. There is another important way that parents should not forget to do – vaccinating their children. Parents should not miss all of their children’s vaccinations. Children can be protected against severe diseases, such as polio, which was “America’s most-feared disease, causing death and paralysis across the country” (“Five Important Reasons to Vaccinate Your Child”). Today, there hasn’t been any news about Polio for the longest time because of vaccinations. However, there are people who don’t have an option to not get vaccinated because they aren’t allowed due to their protection such as pregnant women and newborns. In order to avoid contagious diseases, people who are allowed to do so should get themselves vaccinated for the benefit of those who can’t get vaccinated and have a higher risk of getting severe diseases. For example, “Newborns who are too young to get vaccinated for whooping cough are also most at risk of severe illness from the disease” (“10 Reasons To Get Vaccinated”). Newborn infants have a high risk of getting serious diseases, which should encourage more people to get
After watching The Vaccine War, the main concerns of vaccines are public safety, the aftermath of injecting harmful chemicals into ones’ body and the parents that choose not to vaccinate their children. In the beginning of the documentary, a mother, Jennifer Margulis, states she felt like it was not needed for her newborn child to be vaccinated for a sexual transmitted disease. She feels like the ingredients are scary for a young child to take in with an immature immune system. The other issue is a massive outbreak of disease that could have been prevented. The Center of Disease Control is carefully watching the town that Ms. Margulis lives, Ashland, Oregon, because it’s the least vaccinated places in America due to parents opting out of vaccines.
This genuine concern can go several directions. Some parents are convinced that the inventions of vaccines were made to prevent human-to-human transmitted diseases that can cause serious long-term health complications. While other parents believe that it is the vaccines that pose a greater risk to their child’s health. The truth is that the introduction of a vaccine has, in many cases, led to a very large decrease in the incidence of the targeted disease--such as the 96% decrease in the incidence of polio that occurred within 7 years of the introduction of the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines. Vaccines have changed our way of life, in many areas of the world. Diseases such as polio, measles and rubella are no longer a threat, and the eradication of smallpox alone has saved hundreds of millions of lives. (Nature Reviews Microbiology,
Every parent must decide whether or not they will vaccinate their child. The medical community advocates for vaccinating children, which will contribute to herd immunity, and help in the eradication of preventable diseases. However there are arguments to be made against vaccinating as well. People are finding that vaccines are not providing long term protection, and are less effective than developing immunity through a natural defense process. Vaccines provide unnecessary exposure to toxins which may be linked to developmental delays. Also some of the side effects and complications associated with various vaccines are proving to be more detrimental than the disease processes they are designed to fight against. Many parents are weighing the cost vs. benefits of vaccinations, and deciding that it isn't worth the risk.
Vaccinations and whether to vaccinate or not has been a topic that has been argued for greater than 100 years. The use of vaccinations can be dated as far back as 1000 BC. “Indian doctors traveled to households before the rainy season each year” (Vaccinations, 1) and inoculated persons against smallpox. The encouraged use of vaccinations in the United States began in the early 1700’s with the smallpox vaccine. In 1813, “President James Madison signed into law An Act to Encourage Vaccination, which created the National Vaccine Agency (now part of the US department of Health & Human Services)” (Background of the Issue, 1). Approximately 40 years later states began “mandating vaccinations for schoolchildren” (Background of
Today, children of the U.S. are still getting vaccine-preventable diseases like mumps, measles, and whooping cough. The reason why public schools require vaccinations is to control the spread of diseases from child to child. Parents who don’t vaccinate their children can cause other children, who don’t have an immunity or are allergic to the vaccine, to become ill. According to The Centers of Disease Control, between the years 1994-2014, vaccinations prevented about 322 million cases of childhood illnesses. Parents also opt out for religious reasons and health safety concerns, there are exemptions and vary in requirements
The family has the right to be worried considering “Rhett attends school in Marlin County in California, where just over 84 percent of kindergartners are fully vaccinated” (“7 year old cancer patient...”). Going to a school with that low of a percentage of fully vaccinated children puts Rhett at a high risk for contracting the disease. The recent measles outbreak in Southern California that started in Disneyland is also another justified concern his parents have. The CDC reported that at least 121 have been infected due to the outbreak (“7 year old cancer patient...”). These unvaccinated children in Rhett’s school could have contracted the disease from this outbreak and Rhett could easily be infected. In Rhett’s speech in front of the school committee he said “Now I can say gone with cancer...Soon we will say gone with the measles” (“7 year old cancer patient...”). At the school committee meeting the family requested that personal belief exemptions from vaccinations be abolished. Merlin County, where they live, has the highest percentage of personal exception in the state at 5.89 % (“7 year old cancer patient...”). After going through so much with their child the family should not also have to worry about their child health being at risk for sending him to school. It is well known that some believe having mandatory vaccines infringes on people’s religious rights even if it protects other people. When in fact “parents around the country... are claiming religious exemptions to avoid vaccinating their children when the real reason may be skepticism of the shots or concern they can cause other illnesses”
Parents want their children to be safe, but not all parents want to trust the source that will keep them safe. Although technology and the field of medicine have made progress over the years, people’s mindsets have still not changed. These very human beings who are responsible for society’s progress have let fear and skepticism take over their lives. In particular, the simplest idea of vaccination (a form of treatment that provides immunity against diseases) has turned into a wide controversial topic. Interestingly, vaccines can be traced as early as 1000 CE, but vaccines were upgraded by dedicated intellectuals in the mid-twentieth century. In spite of extensive research and dedication invested in vaccines, many parents do not allow their
According to World Book Advanced Encyclopedia, immunization is defined as the process of protecting the body against disease by means of vaccines or serums (Hinman). While medical science backs up the efficiency and necessity of vaccines, within the past decade, a rise in parents disbelieving the medical community and neglecting to immunize their children has occurred. This “fear of vaccines” is nothing new, but with the ever-increasing safety of vaccines, the benefits of inoculation far outweigh the risks. Parents who refuse to vaccinate, or anti-vaxxers, put more than their children’s lives on the line, but also risk the safety of the whole community. Because vaccines are essential to protecting individuals and communities