Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia

analytical Essay

1153 words

Should euthanasia be allowed or not? It has become a very controversial issue nowadays. Velleman and Hooker have different perspectives on euthanasia, and whether there should be laws permitting voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia. Although there are well-reasoned arguments on both sides, I would strongly agree with Hooker's argument that there should be a law permitting voluntary euthanasia when it is for the wellbeing of the person and that each individual should be able to make their own decision. Brad Hooker believes that according to Rule-Utilitarianism we ought to have laws permitting voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia. The types of euthanasia that he addresses include voluntary euthanasia, such as when a person ends their life …show more content…

For example, if a person is in a coma and the family believes that they will not revive, then the family should allow the patient to die because the patient is basically dead already. Furthermore, if someone is in really bad pain, then they should be able to choose euthanasia because they are suffering a lot. They might not want to die because they acknowledge it would make their family member sad, but on the other hand they are hurting and can only think about is the pain. That is when I strongly agree with Hooker that people should be able to choose euthanasia and that being euthanised is for the best. In my opinion, having a law permitting euthanasia is good because it means that the person can take control of their own life. It would be up to them whether they want to be euthanised or not, in both good and bad conditions. Just having the option can be beneficial to some because it is like having the freedom to choose to live or die. Therefore, If I was sick, I would like to have a law that permits me to choose euthanasia, because I could decide whether it is the best decision for me or

In this essay, the author

Opines that velleman and hooker have different perspectives on euthanasia, and whether there should be laws permitting voluntary and non-voluntary
Explains that brad hooker believes that according to rule-utilitarianism, we ought to have laws permitting voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia.
Analyzes hooker's argument that euthanasia should be allowed and permitted because it increases the greatest expected utility.

Opines that velleman and hooker have different perspectives on euthanasia, and whether there should be laws permitting voluntary and non-voluntary
Explains that brad hooker believes that according to rule-utilitarianism, we ought to have laws permitting voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia.
Analyzes hooker's argument that euthanasia should be allowed and permitted because it increases the greatest expected utility.
Analyzes david velleman's view that allowing voluntary euthanasia is harmful even if people don't exercise it.
Opposes velleman's argument and agrees with hooker that we ought to have a law permitting both voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia.
Concludes that hooker believes in putting euthanasia into law and allowing individuals a choice, while velleman thinks terminally ill individuals cannot possibly be fit to decide.

Click here to unlock this and over one million essays

Continue Reading Check Writing Quality

Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!

Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!

Euthanasia
analytical essay
Conflicting opinion is seen to be found when people talk about euthanasia. Some say it is good because people should have the right to choose what they want to happen to themselves. If they choose to end their suffering they should be able to do it without being made to feel like they have done something wrong. Some lay some guidelines and say...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the euthanasia controversy is part of a larger issue concerning the right to die.
- Explains that there are several arguments in favor of the moral permissibility of euthanasia, including mercy, respect for autonomy, and kant's categorical imperative.
- Explains that many doctors believe that euthanasia is wrong, and that palliative care should be given when people have an incurable illness.
- Explains that the euthanasia controversy is part of a larger issue concerning the right to die.
- Explains that there are several arguments in favor of the moral permissibility of euthanasia, including mercy, respect for autonomy, and kant's categorical imperative.
- Explains that many doctors believe that euthanasia is wrong, and that palliative care should be given when people have an incurable illness.
- Analyzes how euthanasia has a long history of philosophical discussion. ancient greek thinkers favored it, even though they opposed suicide.
- Argues that euthanasia is not a question of ending someone's life but the important question is how their life ends. pro-lifers, people who are against it, place the emphasis on killing.
- Opines that euthanasia is a controversial subject and that it should be left to the sufferer's conscience to decide whether they want to end their lives.
1577 words
Read More
Legalizing Euthanasia
analytical essay
...ncluding the right to participate in assisted suicide. There are many issues concerning euthanasia, however, the three main issues that I feel are important when discussing the legalization of euthanasia are because of medical advances, the severity of pain a person is in once diagnosed with a terminal illness, and the basic fact that a person’s life is their own life and no one else’s. A physician should be allowed to participate in a patient’s death in a compassionate, confidential manner. A physician can provide the most peaceful, least painful and effective means to die. No human being should have to suffer with a terminal illness when an alternate course of action is available, such as euthanasia. No person has the right to take away a freedom given to another without just cause; therefore, who is to say that we cannot pursue the benefits of euthanasia.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that euthanasia should be legalized in the united states for medical advances, the severity of pain a person is in once diagnosed with terminal illness, and the basic fact that life is their own life.
- Argues that all people are morally entitled to end their lives when they feel it to be necessary. jay johansen states in his article "euthanasia: a case of individual liberty?" that terminally ill patients should be able to make their own decisions about their life.
- Analyzes how medical advances have made it possible for us to cure terminal illnesses like pneumonia or cancer by simple administering antibiotics. denying terminally ill patients the right to die with dignity is unfair.
- Opines that euthanasia should be legalized in the united states for medical advances, the severity of pain a person is in once diagnosed with terminal illness, and the basic fact that life is their own life.
- Argues that all people are morally entitled to end their lives when they feel it to be necessary. jay johansen states in his article "euthanasia: a case of individual liberty?" that terminally ill patients should be able to make their own decisions about their life.
- Analyzes how medical advances have made it possible for us to cure terminal illnesses like pneumonia or cancer by simple administering antibiotics. denying terminally ill patients the right to die with dignity is unfair.
- Opines that everyone should have the right to make their own life choices, including participation in euthanasia.
975 words
Read More
The Right To Die
opinion essay
We live an ever-changing society that should not view Euthanasia as an unethical action, but as a way of help for suffering patients. Everyday their are thousands of hard working individuals that are diagnosed with a terminal illness and are now faced with decisions that must both be in the best interest for them and their families. This is neither an easy choice nor one that should be made without serious thought, but it should not be denied or penalized by society or government. It is a choice that must be made only by the patient in question with the input and understanding of their families. Many members of our society have worked very hard throughout their lives and if it is their desire to elect Euthanasia to spare them of the pain and the financial burden that a fatal illness would leave behind, then so be it.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that the right to die should be considered as an option for terminally ill patients and not considered unethical.
- Explains that the financial burden caused by medical treatments is a contributing factor for many patients hardship. medicare's annual $327 billion budget goes to care for patients in their final year of life.
- Opines that terminal illnesses are most commonly associated with cancer, hiv and/or organ disorders. the decision should be made by the patient, as they are the ones dealing with the effects of these illnesses.
- Argues that the right to die should be considered as an option for terminally ill patients and not considered unethical.
- Explains that the financial burden caused by medical treatments is a contributing factor for many patients hardship. medicare's annual $327 billion budget goes to care for patients in their final year of life.
- Opines that terminal illnesses are most commonly associated with cancer, hiv and/or organ disorders. the decision should be made by the patient, as they are the ones dealing with the effects of these illnesses.
- Explains that society views suicide as an unreasonable and inconsiderate action since there are many alternate avenues of help that a person could resort to. euthanasia is only medication that prolongs the death by numbing the pain.
- Explains that 44 million americans have no health insurance and 38 million have inadequate insurance. the cost associated with maintaining a terminally ill patient can be crippling when considering the treatments only prolong the term of suffering.
- Explains that many insurance companies have created limits to how much will be paid for certain medical services that are needed by terminally ill patients, which makes the out of pocket cost nearly impossible for some of these individuals.
- Explains that both washington and oregon have similar requirements when it comes to the "death with dignity act". patients are required to self-administer lethal medication to finalize the euthanasia process.
- Opines that euthanasia should not be viewed as unethical, but as a way of help for suffering patients. this is neither an easy choice nor one that should be made without serious thought.
1025 words
Read More
Pros Of Euthanasia
analytical essay
In today’s modern society the use of euthanasia and assisted suicide is a hot button topic. Due to the argumentative nature of this issue many philosophers have created their own ideas on how euthanasia and assisted suicide benefit or harm society. These philosophers such as Brock and Callahan differ in their arguments about euthanasia and assisted suicide. Like almost all the heavily opinionated topics in society there should be limits to the use thus my consensus regarding euthanasia and assisted suicide is that it should be legalized to a certain extent.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that euthanasia and assisted suicide should be legalized to a certain extent due to the argumentative nature of the issue.
- Analyzes callahan's argument for not using assisted suicide in the medical field because it goes against what physicians are paid to do, which is to keep their patients alive.
- Explains that morality is an issue many people face every day, and for some it's more than a word, it’s how they live.
- Argues that euthanasia and assisted suicide should be legalized to a certain extent due to the argumentative nature of the issue.
- Analyzes callahan's argument for not using assisted suicide in the medical field because it goes against what physicians are paid to do, which is to keep their patients alive.
- Explains that morality is an issue many people face every day, and for some it's more than a word, it’s how they live.
- Analyzes dan w. brock's essay defending the implementation of euthanasia in medicine.
- Explains that gerald dworkin's ideas of paternalism support the use of euthanasia.
- Explains that euthanasia is legal in today's society without many people even blinking an eye at it happening. it is common practice to put an animal down and there are no questions asked.
- Argues that capital punishment is a hypocritical hole in the debate for euthanasia and physician assisted suicide.
- Concludes that euthanasia and physician assisted suicide should be legalized. being human grants us certain unalienable rights.
1705 words
Read More
Persuasive Essay Against Euthanasia
opinion essay
Euthanasia has been a major controversy throughout the years. Euthanasia is basically a painless way for a person to terminates his or her life while going through incurable and painful disease or in comas. Through years, states have been going back and forth to decide whether the patients going through these painful disease, should have the right to decide to end their life or shouldn’t be able to decide at all. During these debates about the topic only three states out of the whole country have made it possible to legalized euthanasia such as: Oregon, Washington, and Montana. In my opinion, I am against this process of people having the chance to end their life and having others the permission to do so such as, doctors or family.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that euthanasia is a painless way for people to terminate their life while going through incurable and painful disease or in comas. only three states have legalized it.
- Opines that government and insurance may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the pas procedure.
- Explains the hippocratic oath, which states that doctors must treat the ill to the best of one's ability, preserve a patient’s privacy, and teach the secrets of medicine.
- Opines that euthanasia is a painless way for people to terminate their life while going through incurable and painful disease or in comas. only three states have legalized it.
- Opines that government and insurance may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the pas procedure.
- Explains the hippocratic oath, which states that doctors must treat the ill to the best of one's ability, preserve a patient’s privacy, and teach the secrets of medicine.
- Opines that euthanasia is misused by family members or relatives because they don't want to be a burden to their families or anyone.
- Argues that ill patients don't have sufficient mental capacity to decide for euthanasia for themselves. the mental capacity act of 2005 states that the mental status of the individual is always seeking for it.
1078 words
Read More
Human’s Attempt to Overrule God: The Debate Over Euthanasia
analytical essay
The debate over euthanasia is a prevalent and pressing issue in today’s society, and possibly one of the most popular. Euthanasia is a topic that will separate a room of people by beliefs. About three years ago, 22 percent of the 18 members of the Humane Society board resigned over the controversial issue of euthanasia (Humane Society CEO Search Reignites Euthanasia Debate 2014). This is a debated issue in which many believe that a person should have the right to decide on how they feel (EUTHANASIA Will Be Debated at an Event in Cheltenham This Week 2014). Euthanasia is a heavily debated topic that is deeply divided because of personal conviction or religion. This is an ongoing moral and ethical worldwide debate, is the w...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia is a word meaning "gentle and easy death", which comes from the greek language. doctors want patients to relax in the mindset that suffering won't be involved.
- Explains that euthanasia is seen as doctors trying to be god in their professions by making the decision of whether or not it’s time for a patient to die.
- Explains that life is one of the most valuable things that humans possess. the debate over euthanasia is prevalent and popular in today's society.
- Explains that euthanasia is a word meaning "gentle and easy death", which comes from the greek language. doctors want patients to relax in the mindset that suffering won't be involved.
- Explains that euthanasia is seen as doctors trying to be god in their professions by making the decision of whether or not it’s time for a patient to die.
- Explains that life is one of the most valuable things that humans possess. the debate over euthanasia is prevalent and popular in today's society.
- Argues that euthanasia is a matter of decency and humanity.
- Explains that court cases have been a major part of the legalization of euthanasia and the laws associated with it.
- Opines that euthanasia is a way out of suffering, but is indeed murder. the bible states that no man has power over the day of death.
- Explains that global issues in context is a web-based resource, based on the encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics.
1326 words
Read More
Euthanasia: Do We Have a Right to Choose Life or Death?
analytical essay
With the growing media attention, Euthanasia has become a huge controversy that is split down the middle. The subject of euthanasia goes back several hundred years but has received much attention in the past century and is still a huge issue. Let’s take a look at what exactly euthanasia is, the history, my views on the subject, and society’s arguments for and against it.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia has become a huge controversy that is split down the middle with the growing media attention.
- Explains that euthanasia is the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit.
- Opines that euthanasia allows the person to end their suffering and makes it easier on the family and friends.
- Explains that euthanasia has become a huge controversy that is split down the middle with the growing media attention.
- Explains that euthanasia is the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit.
- Opines that euthanasia allows the person to end their suffering and makes it easier on the family and friends.
- Explains the second argument that people make for euthanasia is that no one should be "forced" to live such a life that is filled with incurable pain and suffering.
- Explains that some people find euthanasia disgusting and morally wrong, arguing that it would not only be for people who are ‘terminally’ ill’.
- Argues that doctors will pressure people who are depressed or elderly to sign a consent form — this could be pressuring them into feeling guilty, being burdened to others, and the financial costs.
- Explains euthanasia suicide mercy-killing right-to-die physician assisted suicid living wills research.
- Analyzes the pitfalls of physician-assisted suicide. physicians news, sept. 1997.
- Describes the top 10 pros and cons of euthanasia — should it be legal?
1265 words
Read More
Euthanasia Pros
explanatory essay
The debate is on whether its right or wrong to kill patients. Some people believe it isn't humane and others believe euthanasia is the personal choice. Some are against view euthanasia as murder and that we must respect the value of life. Those who are in favor of euthanasia believe that euthanasia eliminates the patient’s pain and suffering. Allowing humans to suffer is more inhumane than killing. Pros main concerns are that we should have a right to our own body, saves from suffering, alternatives are often worse, and shouldn’t be forced alive. Cons main concerns are legalizing murder, abuse, religions, ethics, and devalues human life. The controversy will still remain whether the argument over freedom of choice and the moral issues is
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia is a peaceful way to die in the united states. only nine countries allow it, including netherlands, belgium, colombia, luxembourg, switzerland, germany, japan, canada, and some states.
- Explains that euthanasia is legal and voluntary and ends suffering for the terminally ill.
- Explains that euthanasia is against the hippocratic oath, a greek medical text that swears it's going to follow ethical standards.
- Explains that euthanasia is a peaceful way to die in the united states. only nine countries allow it, including netherlands, belgium, colombia, luxembourg, switzerland, germany, japan, canada, and some states.
- Explains that euthanasia is legal and voluntary and ends suffering for the terminally ill.
- Explains that euthanasia is against the hippocratic oath, a greek medical text that swears it's going to follow ethical standards.
- Explains that euthanasia is one of the biggest controversies. the debate is on whether it's right or wrong to kill patients.
821 words
Read More
Euthanasi The Controversy Between Life And Death
analytical essay
“When a patient says, ‘Help me doctor,’ he is assuming that his doctor is on the side of his life.” This quote by Dr.Margaret Cottle , who is a palliative care physician , shows the mentality that most patients have when it comes to patient care. Euthanasia is a very controversial topic that has been debated on throughout the years. Whether it may be active euthanasia, passive euthanasia, voluntary euthanasia, involuntary euthanasia, indirect or physician assisted the morals and reasoning behind each are controversial. Though some people may believe euthanasia may be justified in a critical situation and critical punishment, euthanasia should be prohibited because euthanasia weakens societies respects for the sanctity of life, euthanasia might not be in the person’s best interest, and euthanasia affects other peoples rights, not just the patients.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that euthanasia is a controversial topic that has been debated throughout the years.
- Argues that euthanasia provides a sense of comfort to the family and the terminally ill that one is put out of their pain and suffering.
- Explains that a large portion of society believes euthanasia disrespects the sanctity of life. christians believe that human life should naturally be protected because of its attributes.
- Argues that euthanasia is a controversial topic that has been debated throughout the years.
- Argues that euthanasia provides a sense of comfort to the family and the terminally ill that one is put out of their pain and suffering.
- Explains that a large portion of society believes euthanasia disrespects the sanctity of life. christians believe that human life should naturally be protected because of its attributes.
- Explains that when one has the opportunity to choose between life and death it may not be in the persons best interest. physician assisted suicide may also fall into this category.
- Explains that euthanasia affects other people's rights, not just the patients.
- Opines that capital punishment is controversial, but god did not intend for people to die this way, which circles back to respecting the life god has given to us human beings.
- Opines that euthanasia should be prohibited because it destroys people's respect for the sanctity of life and affects others' rights, not just those of the patients.
801 words
Read More
Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia
opinion essay
The question of euthanasia is one that has plagued the human sense of morale for centuries. With modern medical technology it becomes even more pressing. I will cover three aspects of Euthanasia including three principles for, three principles against, and my own conclusion as to why Euthanasia is morally justified.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the question of euthanasia has plagued the human sense of morale for centuries. with modern medical technology, it becomes even more pressing.
- Explains that euthanasia is derived from the greek language: euthos, meaning easy, and thanos, means dying. there is also active and passive euthanasy.
- Argues that individuals should have the right to make their own choices in personal issues such as death. not respecting one’s wish for a quiet and peaceful death disrespects one's autonomy.
- Explains that the question of euthanasia has plagued the human sense of morale for centuries. with modern medical technology, it becomes even more pressing.
- Explains that euthanasia is derived from the greek language: euthos, meaning easy, and thanos, means dying. there is also active and passive euthanasy.
- Argues that individuals should have the right to make their own choices in personal issues such as death. not respecting one’s wish for a quiet and peaceful death disrespects one's autonomy.
- Opines that individuals' right to make their own decisions is protected by the united states constitution as part of the right to privacy.
- Argues that society should have compassion for the suffering of others. passive euthanasia by removing a feeding tube is inhumane.
- Opines that society should be compassionate and understanding. with assisted suicide loved ones will have a chance to prepare for their loss and be aware that the patient is no longer going to suffer through their illness.
- Opines that one's quantity of life does not necessarily grant satisfaction. longevity but being unable to communicate or self aware takes away from said quality.
- Explains that many people with degenerative diseases lose their physical abilities and eventually can't control their bodies. being unable to communicate or respond to one's surroundings makes life devoid of quality.
- Argues that euthanasia limits the autonomy of family members and doctors alike. everyone has a right to make decisions that are best for themselves.
- Opines that society has a responsibility to care for the sick and old in the twilight of their lives and should not make them feel unwanted. supporting active euthanasia only contributes to their reasoning.
- Concludes that euthanasia is not necessary to achieve a peaceful death. proper use of medication and hospital admission can help people enjoy their final days among family and friends.
- Explains that hospice provides comfort and care not only to patients themselves but to their families as well. it is a good alternative to euthanasia.
- Concludes that they are in full support of euthanasia. there will need to be regulations but that is the way with most of our rights as u.s. citizens.
- Opines that sacrificing a moment of discomfort to end another's is entirely worth it. watching the terminally ill and the elderly suffer makes the family and friends suffer as well.
- Opines that individuals have the right to choose life or death, but denying it is intrinsically wrong. death is a very personal issue and if life is no longer worth living, who are we to force unwanted life upon someone?
- Opines that euthanasia should be an option for those who want it. many will still have objections, but if they choose, a quick and easy death awaits.
1005 words
Read More
Euthanasia Essay: Assisted Suicide
analytical essay
In her paper entitled "Euthanasia," Phillipa Foot notes that euthanasia should be thought of as "inducing or otherwise opting for death for the sake of the one who is to die" (MI, 8). In Moral Matters, Jan Narveson argues, successfully I think, that given moral grounds for suicide, voluntary euthanasia is morally acceptable (at least, in principle). Daniel Callahan, on the other hand, in his "When Self-Determination Runs Amok," counters that the traditional pro-(active) euthanasia arguments concerning self-determination, the distinction between killing and allowing to die, and the skepticism about harmful consequences for society, are flawed. I do not think Callahan's reasoning establishes that euthanasia is indeed morally wrong and legally impossible, and I will attempt to show that.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that euthanasia should be thought of as "inducing or otherwise opting for death for the sake of the one who is to die." narveson and callahan argue that the traditional pro-(active) arguments regarding self-determination are flawed.
- Analyzes callahan's claim that euthanasia is different from suicide in that it involves not only the right of a person to self-determination, but the transfer of right to kill to the acting agent.
- Argues that killing in the context of euthanasia is not morally wrong as suggested by callahan.
- Opines that euthanasia should be thought of as "inducing or otherwise opting for death for the sake of the one who is to die." narveson and callahan argue that the traditional pro-(active) arguments regarding self-determination are flawed.
- Analyzes callahan's claim that euthanasia is different from suicide in that it involves not only the right of a person to self-determination, but the transfer of right to kill to the acting agent.
- Argues that killing in the context of euthanasia is not morally wrong as suggested by callahan.
- Analyzes callahan's argument about the consequences of legalizing euthanasia, namely the abuse of the law, the difficulty of writing, and the inherent slipperiness of moral reasons.
- Disagrees with callahan's belief that an indifferent attitude toward abuse would prevail. revoking doctors' licenses is a good way to ensure that euthanasia is not concealed.
- Counters callahan's arguments against three types of arguments that support euthanasia: the right to self-determination, the insignificant difference between killing and letting a person die by removing their life support.
925 words
Read More
The Slippery Slope of Euthanasia
analytical essay
The debate on whether voluntary euthanasia should be legalized has been a controversial topic. Euthanasia is defined as ‘a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, to relieve intractable suffering’ [1]. Voluntary euthanasia refers to the patients who understand the terms in the consent and sign up under consciousness, while involuntary euthanasia is performed against patient's wishes and some people may regard it as a murder [1].
In this essay, the author
- Explains that practicing euthanasia is against the will of god. christians and jews believe that every human being is a gift from god and is made in god's image.
- Explains that legalizing euthanasia poses a threat to the vulnerable people such as the elderly, the poor and the disabled people.
- Argues that euthanasia is needed for the fair distribution of medical resources, but the legalization of it is not the best way letting more patients receive medical treatments.
- Explains that practicing euthanasia is against the will of god. christians and jews believe that every human being is a gift from god and is made in god's image.
- Explains that legalizing euthanasia poses a threat to the vulnerable people such as the elderly, the poor and the disabled people.
- Argues that euthanasia is needed for the fair distribution of medical resources, but the legalization of it is not the best way letting more patients receive medical treatments.
- Concludes that in today's world there is no place for the legalization of voluntary euthanasia.
- Cites emmanuel ej, "cost savings at the end of life," jama, vol. 275, pp.
- Argues that the legalization of euthanasia should not be proposed nowadays.
- Cites r. m. walker's "physician-assisted suicide: the legal slippery slope," cancer control : journal of the moffitt cancer center, vol. 8, 2001.
1061 words
Read More
Euthanasia
analytical essay
The voluntary active euthanasia is legitimately moral. It is morally right for a person to seek euthanasia because it is their freedom or autonomy to control their own lives. It ends the suffering of the patient without harming other people. Furthermore, it prevents the person to suffer by giving him/her lethal injection or medication that prevents a person to die slowly with pain. On the other hand, the arguments against euthanasia are not sound. A thorough assessment will protect patient who request euthanasia for the benefits of others. A patient who seek for euthanasia does not use him/herself as means, but as ends to respect his/her own humanity. Furthermore, God as a benevolent will not allow a person to suffer which endorse the purpose of euthanasia – to end suffering. Therefore, voluntary active euthanasia should be legalized in the United States.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia is an action that result in the death of a person.
- Explains immanuel kant's view that a person has dignity that makes him autonomous. patients are rational agents and can make their own decisions based on reason.
- Explains that stephen g. potts' argument against vae is that a patient might seek euthanasia for the benefits of other people. a careful analysis could protect the patient's interest.
- Explains that euthanasia is an action that result in the death of a person.
- Explains immanuel kant's view that a person has dignity that makes him autonomous. patients are rational agents and can make their own decisions based on reason.
- Explains that stephen g. potts' argument against vae is that a patient might seek euthanasia for the benefits of other people. a careful analysis could protect the patient's interest.
- Explains that in the utilitarian's greatest happiness principle, voluntary active euthanasia is morally just. the terminally ill patient suffering from pain and suffering has the moral right to be free from it.
- Argues that the second version of categorical imperative of immanuel kant might argue that vae is immoral.
- Explains that james rachels' article, "active and passive euthanasia," states that letting the patient die is "slow and painful," while killing him or her is quick and easy.
- Argues that the catholic church will argue that vae is a crime against life. the "declaration on euthanasia" states that no one is permitted to ask for this act of killing.
- Opines that voluntary active euthanasia is morally right and ends the suffering of the patient without harming others. however, the arguments against it are not sound.
1169 words
Read More
The Pros and Cons of Euthanasia
opinion essay
“Euthanasia is defined as a deliberate act undertaken by one person with the intention of ending life of another person to relieve that person's suffering and where the act is the cause of death.”(Gupta, Bhatnagar and Mishra) Some define it as mercy killing. Euthanasia may be voluntary, non voluntary and involuntary. When terminally ill patient consented to end his or her life, it is called voluntary euthanasia. Non voluntary euthanasia occurs when the suffering person never consented nor requested to end a life. These patients are incompetent to decide because they are either minor, in a comatose stage or have mental conditions. Involuntary euthanasia is conducted when it is against the will of the patient (Gupta, Bhatnagar, Mishra). Euthanasia can be either passive or active. Passive euthanasia means life-sustaining treatments are withheld and nothing is done to keep the patient alive. Active euthanasia occurs when a physician do something by giving drugs or substances that ends a patient’s life. (Medical News Today)
In this essay, the author
- Defines euthanasia as a deliberate act undertaken by one person with the intention of ending life of another person to relieve their suffering and where the act is the cause of death.
- Explains that euthanasia involves taking a human’s life, but not all forms of killing are wrong nor consider as murder. it depends on the underlying reasons and intentions.
- Opines that euthanasia is justified if the purpose is to comfort and relieve pain. providing adequate amount of pain-relief treatment is also a way to extend life.
- Defines euthanasia as a deliberate act undertaken by one person with the intention of ending life of another person to relieve their suffering and where the act is the cause of death.
- Explains that euthanasia involves taking a human’s life, but not all forms of killing are wrong nor consider as murder. it depends on the underlying reasons and intentions.
- Opines that euthanasia is justified if the purpose is to comfort and relieve pain. providing adequate amount of pain-relief treatment is also a way to extend life.
- Analyzes how lesley martin's interview is an example of euthanasia. she is a registered nurse who relocated to new zealand to take care of her mother, joy.
- Opines that euthanasia is acceptable because its purpose is to comfort and alleviate the person’s suffering. although lesley is a nurse, it is beyond her scope of practice to increase the dosage.
- Explains that pro-euthanasia argues that each person has the right to die and die with dignity. the underlying debate is the person’s quality of life.
- Describes how their friend's experience is another form of euthanasia. her grandmother was a dialysis patient for almost 20 years.
- Explains that judging a person worthless due to mental conditions devalues their life. having disabilities or being unconscious does not mean they do not have the right to live.
- Opines that euthanasia is acceptable under certain circumstances, but not all forms of killing are murder. the goal is to comfort the dying person and lessen their suffering as much as possible.
- Cites gupta, deepak, bhatnagar, and seema mishra in "euthanasia: issues implied within."
- Explains the case against euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, mcgill-queen’s university press, 2001.
1265 words
Read More