Pros And Cons Of Confidentiality In Group Therapy

1108 Words3 Pages

Bernard et al (p 508) postulated that therapists should discuss with potential group members the problem of protecting clients’ confidentiality from one another, since confidentiality in group settings can be neither guaranteed nor enforced in most states. Bernard et al (p.481) postulated that special attention needs to be paid to encourage confidentiality in group and the protection of each member’s anonymity. The limits of confidentiality in group therapy, relative to individual therapy, must be carefully discussed. Therefore the group leader taking the initiative to release more information about the group is unethical. The leader should be enforcing the client’s right to confidentiality although they are in a group setting instead of compounding …show more content…

We are all aware that group counseling is a little different from the regularly counseling but that does not mean that some of the same principles does not still apply and informed consent is one of them. Members in group therapy still have the right to be properly informed and their consent is still needed. I don’t know how the group leader came to the conclusion that informed consent is not possible but this view might have negative consequences for the group and for the leader as well. Informed consent cover or take in a wide range of issues. Bernard et al (p. 509) stipulated that informed consent for group therapy may include a discussion of the potential risks and benefits of group therapy and other treatment options, group expectations regarding physical touch, punctuality, fees, gifts, and leader self–disclosure, boundary crossings/violations and stuff like that. The best course of action as it related to informed consent would be to ensure that the members of the group are properly informed whether at the start of therapy or in a continuous course throughout the group …show more content…

I am aware that there are different types of groups and so there may be different way of doing things. However it doesn’t make sense to me because I think the entire session will be built around the goals. Bernard et al noted (p 459) that the better informed that clients are about the objectives and processes of the group, the smoother will be their entry into the group, and the more likely that they will attend, work, and remain. The more informed that colleagues are regarding the objectives and processes of the group, the more likely the referrals will be appropriate and the more likely the group will operate smoothly without internal or external interference or disruption. The goals helps you to know what techniques/procedures you will use. He was right not to discuss the procedure because it wouldn’t make sense without the goals. Again that is why planning is important because if you had preparation then those goals would have been discussed with the group and the group would know what they will be working on. This is all a part of informing the group

More about Pros And Cons Of Confidentiality In Group Therapy

Open Document