Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
cigarettes advertising should be illegal
Impact of tobacco essay
consequences of allowing cigarette advertisements.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: cigarettes advertising should be illegal
Some believe that companies should have the right to advertise their products, even if they 've proven to be harmful for the consumer. When it comes to a product like cigarettes, there have been many studies about the toxic effects it can have on the user over a long period of time therefore banning advertising for such a product doesn 't seem unreasonable. In 2001, the Indian government proposed a bill that would ban tobacco advertising from sporting and cultural events, with the intention to lessen the appeal to the younger audience. This bill was met with much resistance from the Indian Tobacco Company because less advertising meant less tobacco sales which would hurt the industries bottom line. Also, this showed the government was making an ethical decision and putting the health of it 's people first, because it financially benefitted from taxation on the sale of cigarettes.
The Pros
…show more content…
First of all, it is not uncommon for countries to ban things that are harmful to it 's citizens, most recreational drugs are banned around the world. Then if you look at potentially dangerous products like weapons or pharmaceuticals, the advertising for them has been very restricted or banned as well and purchasing them usually comes with a heavy government control. In places like Belgium and France, it had been ruled not unconstitutional to ban advertising of cigarettes because this was a move to protect public health. This was definitely a big step in making this a possibility in other countries. Also, there was a study done that showed over a 10 year period of banned advertising on cigarettes how consumption dropped compared to the less significant decrease in countries that had no ban in place. This was evidence that by putting a ban in place, there was a direct correlation to how that affects
Tobacco companies should be prevented from using advertising tactics that target teenagers. There has always been controversy as to how tobacco companies should prevent using advertising tactics to target teenagers. As controversial as this is tobacco companies shouldn’t advertise teen smoking. Many teens may be lured to believe cigarette advertising because it has been part of the American Culture for years, magazine ads and the media target young people, and these companies receive a drastic increase financially; however, the advertising by these cigarette companies has disadvantages such as having to campaign against their own company, limiting their cigarette advertising and becoming a controversial dilemma as to encouraging teenagers to smoke. From billboards to newspaper advertisements, cigarette promotions started becoming part of the American Culture.
There needs to be a policy to ban cigarettes, it kills the smoker, in addition, could kill the person exposed to the smoke from cigarettes. “The cigarette is also a defective product, meaning not just dangerous but unreasonably dangerous, killing half its long-term users” (Proctor), cigarettes are not healthy in any way making it a defective product, it mainly kills the smoker rather than helping them. It was produced to be inhalable smoke harming anyone who smokes them making it a defect because in the past the tobacco was too harsh to be inhaled. The policy would help cigarette smokers, especially since they don’t even like the habit of smoking cigarettes, knowing it harms them.
Cigarette advertisements reflect society’s love-hate relationship with tobacco products through the ages. During its heyday of popularity, cigarette advertisements were not governed in any way, allowing tobacco companies to use any means necessary to sell their products including advertising during popular children’s television shows. This practice came under scrutiny around 1964 when the Surgeon General released its first report on “smoking and health.” This report stated that smoking may be hazardous to your health. Soon to follow the release of this report was a ban on all cigarette advertisements on television and radio.
In conclusion the country of India has many supporters and non supporters of the tobacco advertising ban. While some argue that it is totally in the best interest of the citizens. Others feel it is a blatant abuse of power by the government. The conflict of interest arises from India being a country that is in the tobacco industry to banning the advertising of the product they are growing. And by having government put strict regulations on the production of tobacco in regards to the added contaminants would reduce the health risks involved with the consumption of the current products
“Cigarette is one of the leading cause of death in the World!” “Cigarette can cause lungs cancer!” “Cigarette is harmful and is bad for society!” These are the things that the society taught us ever since we are young. Everyone knows that cigarette is harmful for the human body, but why does the percentage of people smoking is still high and is increasing every year. Why does it is so hard for people to quit or not try cigarette in the first place, despite knowing the consequences of this small, innocent looking-yet-deadly roll of paper. Clearly, the effort of our society to prevent people from smoking is not effective. Recently, more and more anti-smoking campaigns were produced by different corporations, in order to join the race in tobacco
Advertising is the most profitable market that thrives with aggressive manipulation. Radio, magazines and TV are dangerous past-times that wash away our good intentions with subliminal messages spread thick like peanut butter. Suddenly we question the healthier approach to living we have been striving for. Why? Advertising. How is it that we are so easily influenced? Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs teaches advertisers the weaknesses in all of us, making it very easy to grab our attention and influence our buying behavior. As Stuart Hirschberg wrote in The Rhetoric of Advertising, “ads can be effective if they appeal to the needs, values, and beliefs of the audience” (Hirschberg 102). Advertisements promise a more fulfilling life (Hirschberg 104), but in actuality they create an ominous void that no product can fill. We become self-absorbed, materialistic, never satisfied, pretentions and ironically insecure individuals. It is too bad that our vain tendencies trumps our desire to become positive, self-assured, and healthy individuals.
I think cigarettes and Prescription drugs are dangerous to be marketed the way they are. Cigarettes in other countries show images of what happens to lungs, teeth, tongue and face when a person smokes cigarettes. Currently cigarettes in the U.S still have reinforcing images and trigger words to market cigarettes. Prescription drugs are also blasted on t.v commercials showing their benefit but covering their symptoms by using tiny disclaimer letters at the bottom including stating symptoms really fast at the end of the thirty second commercial. It makes a difference that these products are legal because they are able to market reach customers who might have never been reached before. I think it would be right to single them out because they
It can be questioned if cigarette advertising actually does have an impact on demand for cigarettes. A study titled “A Simultaneous Model of Cigarette Advertising: Effects on Demand and Industry Response to Public Policy”, by Barry J. Seldon and Khosrow Doroodian, a mathematical model was used, and it was found that “the estimated demand coefficients [they had found] suggest that advertising increases cigarette consumption and health warning reduce aggregate demand for cigarettes” (Seldon & Doroodian 675). This not only demonstrates how the graphic warning are effective as stated previous, but also that the advertising that is out in the general public’s will have an impact on the economic demand of cigarettes. Because of the major advertising bans, and the evidence found in this study, it can be concluded that demand for cigarettes is thus reduced with a reduction in advertisements. Although tobacco companies are spending more in today’s society on advertisements (Qi 246), they are less prevalent and less found in the general public because of strict regulations that have been put in place. Seldon and Doroodian state that their results “imply that the government could decrease demand by banning all forms of advertisement”, but they go on to stating that “such a ban would not eliminate smoking due to habit persistence and the “advertising” that occurs when individuals see
The Tobacco Industry received quite a message from the Government of India (GOI) in 2001. The GOI planned on stopping the advertisements of Tobacco from cultural and sporting events alike, with a bill that was on the horizon of being released. The goal was to equip the Government with the tools to launch an anti-Tobacco Program and discourage adolescents from consuming tobacco products. A heated discussion sparked soon after the proposition of this decision.
Cigarette advertisements give the feeling that smokers are "bursting at the seams with joy" and that smoking is useful to you. Shockingly, nothing could be further from reality. The U.S. government has marked cigarettes as an unsafe medication that causes lung malignancy, coronary illness, and numerous different genuine sicknesses and conditions. Numerous individuals everywhere throughout the nation are discussing whether tobacco organizations ought to be permitted to publicize cigarettes or even to make cigarettes in today 's general public ("Analyzing Assorted Tobacco Advertisements").
One way that the tobacco industry can be more ethical is changing their advertising strategy. I believe that today’s advertising strategy is very misleading about cigarettes. Examples of this unethical advertising is in Argentina, here 20 percent of television advertising is spent on smoking commercials, as well as in countries in and around Africa there are billboards that depict a man in a business suit stepping out of a black Mercedes as a chauffeur holds the door. This displays that cigarettes make people classy and sophisticated, making cigarettes look not only harmless but stylish. Another good example of unethical depiction on cigarettes is in Nigeria; here they promote a cigarette for graduates, with a picture of a university and a student in a cap and gown. As if this wasn’t a misleading visual they add a slogan that says, "A very important cigarette for very important people." These ads and slogan are ...
yet it is one of the most dangerous things you can do to yourself. Many people
People who have been smoking for years will often not quit, but continue the habit until they die from natural causes or from something caused by the tobacco they have consumed for years. Kids see family members smoking, they don’t need to see advertising, and they often think it makes them a grown up if they smoke. It’s been a real eye opener though since we’ve gotten to Egypt. Here you can walk down the street and see kids smoking, and they look like they may have been doing it for years. I don’t think these kids were wowed by any kind of advertising. No, in fact they’ve watched their mother, father, brother, sister, and whoever else smoke for years, so they have picked up the habit. This is why a ban on advertising is never going to make a huge difference in the number of smokers in the world. The fact of the matter is that no matter how much the government tries to control the advertising, as long as the product is still legal for people to buy it, they will. If they don’t see advertising about the new products, what will they do? Just continue on with the same old type of tobacco product they have been smoking for years. The fact that as humans we have free will and
Although it is beneficial for the economy for the production of tobacco products it is extremely risky to use the product. According to researchers second-hand smoke is terrible for everyone in the world who walk by someone who is exhaling. In the article by Robert Proctor “Why ban the sale of cigarettes? The case for abolition” he states that cigarettes are the “most deadl...
Opponents believe that adults have the right to make the decision to consume tobacco and are fully aware of the risks. The freedom to make our own choices is a fundamental component of a free society. When government creeps into our daily lives we are all at risk of losing our freedoms. Manufacturers of tobacco ascertain that if they are allowed to produce and sell tobacco then they should be able to advertise their product as well. After all, advertising is an effective means by which companies can help the consumer differentiate between their products. Opponents of the ban also cite a survey by the Indian Market Research Bureau. In this survey, none of the respondents listed advertising as the reason they started