South University Online. (2013). POL2076: American Government: Week 4: People and Politics—Interest Groups. Retrieved from http://myeclassonline.com
Elections are a fundamental part to American politics. There are a lot of factors that play into how elections carry themselves, but what is more important is the work that goes into preparing for them. The elections are like the Baseball World Series and the campaigning is all the training that you have done before hand. Elections are the important part of the game, but without all the campaigning that is done there can be no elections. Candidates are wise and know that campaigning is a true make or break when it comes time to vote. The campaigning process is a time to try and get to know the voters and create a certain kind of connection that would result with more followers. Congressional campaigns, unlike Presidential campaigns, are directed to the districts where they can have more personal relationship with their constituents, which would help them win more votes.
The use of politics has changed over the years since the pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock and the Declaration of Independence was pinned in 1776. Politics has become more about serving a personal ideological agenda, rather than serving the needs of the country as a whole. Often commentary is made by reporters and talk show hosts that political campaigns are different now than they used to be, however, since early on in politics, political campaigns have housed a policy of “anything goes.” In 1864 when Abraham Lincoln ran for re-election, the political ads that ran during the campaign degraded Lincoln’s character, including ads run by his own political party. According to Larry Tagg (2009) as reported in the Richmond Examiner, “The obscene ape of Illinois is about to be deposed from the Washington purple, and...
“The Candidate” is a prime example to the inside of a campaign and the inside of an election. Elections do not only include the candidate themselves but the campaign manager, the supporters, the nominee’s family and the media crew. During “The Candidate” democratic nominee John McKay uses many strategies in order to “not” win his election for senator of California. Going into this campaign McKay was in hopes that he would not win the election, as time passed his view of the election changed as did his strategies.
When it comes to voting there are some major issues of concerns of whom the voters choose to votes for. Some of these issues consist of party affiliation, group interests, the candidate themselves, the economy and policy issues. In the election
Contrary to the polls, republicans are expecting a triumphant election session. If they succeed with their campaign plans they could ultimately cause a political upset. Unlike the Democrats, the republicans are massively investing in their campaign. They are actively preparing for the “toughest election in at least a decade,” (Mehlam). Unlike previous years there are only a handful of house seats available this election, compared to the almost 100 available in 1994.
Campaigning and debating are two things used to help get the people to be in
The second charge, similarly related to the first, charges that party promises and platforms held by candidates for elections are aimed mainly at getting elected more than governing and trying to make a difference. They do and say whatever it takes to get elected and stay elected, with little or no concern as to how the people feel or what they want. They tell people what they want to hear rather than what they really stand for (I'm not so sure if the majority of politicians really stand for anything moral or ethical, at all). These dishonest practices have damaged our "democracy"-or so they call it. Candidates who lack solid governing ideas often use marketing experts and image consultants to get voters' support. The result becomes increasingly more apparent with each election period: Voters are ever more skeptical and suspicious when deciding whom to trust and believe. I cannot speak for all voters but I can speak on behalf of those I know. We feel, as many others do, that you can't trust a politician or candidate. They do whatever it takes to get into office and then, they do whatever they want to. Meanwhile, upholding an ideal image of leadership and admirability, only to pacify the public eye. Deceitful-to put it in a nice way. Democracy, in the true definition of the word?-Hardly.
Every four years, a new president is nominated by the citizens of the United States of America. This individual is deemed to be worthy of such hierarchy of a position. In some cases, it is believed that the public decide whom they desire for president before any form of campaigning occurs. On the contrary, to a number of voters, campaigns make or break a voter’s decision. Nevertheless, presidential campaigning can be extremely vital to the number of votes a candidate receives. Over the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, political campaign advertisements have commonly been used by candidates to grasp the attention of voters. These advertisements have ranged all over in positivity to negativity. Some advertisements have proved to persuade public opinion whereas some have managed to do the exact opposite.
Believe it or not, there was a time in history where it was unnecessary for candidates to campaign. The tiresome job of campaigning was left to the political parties and their staffs. As time has passed, it appears that the candidates themselves have taken charge of the campaigns. Presidential candidates need to appeal to the public in order to gain support. In this day and age, mass media is the most efficient way to do it. The careful sculpting of the candidate’s images have taken a very important role in presidential campaigns. The use of the “idiot box” has prioritized images above issues and transformed how we view and elect our nation’s leaders.
Imagine a world in which presidential debates were not televised, and a person would have to read the newspaper to get all their political news. Just how different would our country be today? Television has a huge effect on American politics. It is often the main source from which people derive their reasoning and opinions from. There is a plethora of news television channels to choose from and gather information from. These channels often run all times of the day. Keeping American citizens up to date on all developing news. Television properly helps U.S citizens vet and get to know the candidate, as well as the candidate's plan.
In the U.S., the average person sees 25,000 commercials a year. These commercials are not just advertising a product. They are also advertising the values and lifestyles that surround it. Take, for example, our countries burst of patriotism after the September 11th attacks. Soon after the attacks, the cover model of Vogue appeared on the November issue wearing an American flag T-shirt, and a page of the magazine was dedicated to advertising the new style of “chic, patriotic” clothing. Television commercials as well have taken a turn towards patriotism, some in very subtle ways. It seems that many ads now emphasize families, comfort, sentimentality, and security, things that are desired by many U.S. citizens after the attacks. Through indirect messages, ads not only promise these things to those who purchase their products, they also promote these desires and feelings, wrapping us all up in warm, patriotic comfort instead of encouraging any kind of critical thinking or examination of the issue at hand. Few of us are safe exempt from receiving these messages, as 98% of all homes in America own a TV set, and the average person spends four hours a day watching it. Unfortunately, it isn’t just the c...
There comes a point in every race for public office, when a clear front-runner emerges and the question becomes not, “Who will win?” but, “Will he keep his promises when he does?”
Many political commentators and pundits have described 2016 US Presidential elections as bizarre and unique (Rothenberg 2016). But when factors pertaining to the current election are observed and compared to that of the past elections, the 2016 election does not appear different from past elections. While the candidate with less popular vote winning the majority of the electoral votes makes this election little unusual, common factors like partisanship, the power held by the swing states, dynamics and tactics of the candidates’ election campaigns and the anger towards the establishment still played the most powerful role in determining the fate of the election.