Identity is defined as the mixture of conception as well as the expression of a person. It entails the affiliations with other people or groups. It is the specific characteristic that is associated with a particular individual. This character is mostly generated from how one is brought up and the environment surrounding an individual’s upbringing process. The identity is closely related to reputation as well as self image. However, most people have a challenge in proving their identity. This raises the question of how to prove one’s identity in the society. This paper will focus on the question and make an argument of how to prove identity. The first method of proving identity is commitment to certain behaviour. There is a high tendency of …show more content…
This is closely connected with behavioural consistency. An individual with a definite character and behaviour should be able to resist pressure that does not agree with his behavioural and characteristic principles. This means that having personal principles is a way of proving identity. The reason is that one will have a line of behaviour, with a clear list of what can be done and what cannot be done. Making a list of the things that one cannot do simply indicates the identity of someone with clear …show more content…
However, these strategies begin with personal knowledge as well as appreciation. It is important for someone to know about his or herself and then move a step closer to determine can be done as well as what cannot be done Individuals who determine the rules of what they can do or cannot do based on their own personal audit report are likely to have a more accurate as well as definite character. This will extend to having an identity that is visible and real. This rubberstamps that personal identity proof requires an individual to make more than one effort in order to have a real, definite and consistent identity that can be
Identity is very important in a person’s life. It can induce pride or shame, provide a community or provide a way to distinguish one’s self from others. But, where does this identity come from? It is easy to assume we are who we are because of who raised us, but this is not the entire case. Andrew Solomon, author of “Far from the Tree” introduced two different forms of identity, vertical and horizontal. He defines vertical identity as the attributes acquired and shared by the people we are raised by and horizontal identity as the attributes different from those who raised us, but are shared and acquired through a peer community. These two types of identities generally do not intersect and, depending on the circumstance, one can greatly impact
Before beginning the explanation of how an identity is formed, one must understand what an identity is. So, what is identity? To answer this, one might think of what gives him individuality; what makes him unique; what makes up his personality. Identity is who one is. Identity is a factor that tells what one wants out of life and how he is set to get it. It tells what kind of a person one is by the attitude and persona he has. And it depends upon the mixture of all parts of one’s life including personal choices and cultural and societal influences, but personal choices affect the identity of one more than the others.
Personal identity does not reside in the activities a person participates in throughout life. As argued, personal identity relies on the elements of the body criterion. Using the body criterion, the peers at the high school reunion are able to identify James as the same person after ten years even without the name tag he wears.
This essay has covered the concept of practical identities and their unique characteristic of contingency as well as the foundation of all value in our actions that all rational beings have- moral identity. Reflecting on these ideas, one can relate to the conception of practical identities or moral identity. However, the suggestion of their contingency or non-contingency and their importance in one’s life is questionable. One is led to wonder what the real source of value in one’s action is and the real weight of practical and moral identities in one’s
In his 1971 paper “Personal Identity”, Derek Parfit posits that it is possible and indeed desirable to free important questions from presuppositions about personal identity without losing all that matters. In working out how to do so, Parfit comes to the conclusion that “the question about identity has no importance” (Parfit, 1971, p. 4.2:3). In this essay, I will attempt to show that Parfit’s thesis is a valid one, with positive implications for human behaviour. The first section of the essay will examine the thesis in further detail and the second will assess how Parfit’s claims fare in the face of criticism.
Derek Parfit is a philosopher who, in Part 3 of his book Reasons and Persons, explores the question of personal identity. He asks what aspect of a person defines their identity. Parfit goes about with thought experiments to examine how he would define a person’s identity to be. Two theories he discusses are the theory of Physical Criterion and the theory of Wide Psychological Criterion. By using two theory desiderata (general traits that strong theories should possess), explanatory power and existing beliefs, it can be shown that the personal identity theory of Wide Psychological Criterion is the most plausible one.
Identity is a group of characteristics, data or information that belongs exactly to one person or a group of people and that make it possible to establish differences between them. The consciousness that people have about themselves is part of their identity as well as what makes them unique. According to psychologists, identity is a consistent definition of one’s self as a unique individual, in terms of role, attitudes, beliefs and aspirations. Identity tries to define who people are, what they are, where they go or what they want to be or to do. Identity could depend on self-knowledge, self-esteem, or the ability of individuals to achieve their goals. Through self-analysis people can define who they are and who the people around them are. The most interesting point about identity is that some people know what they want and who they are, while it takes forever for others to figure out the factors mentioned before. Many of the individuals analyzed in this essay are confused about the different possible roles or positions they can adopt, and that’s exactly the reason they look for some professional help.
Gunnarsson, Logi. "Logi Gunnarsson - Philosophy of Personal Identity and Multiple Personality - Reviewed by John P. Lizza, Kutztown University of Pennsylvania - Philosophical Reviews - University of Notre Dame." About Philosophical Reviews - University of Notre Dame. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2004. Web. Mar. 2011. .
In conclusion, the formation of one’s identity has many components. Beginning at the onset of adolescence and continuing to expand, grow and form and reform as we live through the struggles or success of life. Many theorists have endeavored to clarify the development of identity formation. However, Erik Erickson offered one significant theory involving the formation of one’s identity. Expounding on Erickson theory, Marcia developed his Identity Status Model according to the existence or absence of crisis and commitments. These four statuses, diffusion, foreclosure, moratorium and achievement can combine in various ways to produce a self. One’s sense of identity is determined largely by the choices and commitments made, therefore, having a well-developed sense of self can provide an individual with insight to their strengths, weaknesses, and individual uniqueness. An individual that finds themselves
An identity is more than just a name. Sometimes an identity is the first thing and possible the only thing a person notices about one or the other. A person's identity can represent their culture, their race and sometimes, even possible their family background. My identity is what represents me. For those who does not know me personally but knows my name, knows my identity. This identity is what people will recognize me as for now and possible for ever.
Webster's dictionary describes identity as sameness of essential character, individuality, or the fact of being the same person as one claims to be. So your identity can include your name, your age, your job title, or simply characteristics of your body. These things are facts, facts you don't care to share with the world. Just as the word suggests your identity is something by which you can be identified. These are things that describe a person in terms a stranger would understand. This area of identity is proof of who you are. However, your identity is also composed of what you are. They mark your role in society. Who you are and what you do make up your identity. This is essential in the human life span because people are always searching to find where they truly belong in the world.
Think of a stacking doll. Each outer doll removed reveals another; smaller and more volnerable than the previous. With each section combined there is a whole, but with only a section you cannot see the doll in it’s entirety and it is impossible to see whether another is hiding inside. Ones identity is similar. With little knowlege of a person it is impossible to know what is inside and whether there is more to see. Identity is broader than one word definitions, different aspects such as feelings and memories contribute. In order to get the full sense of who a person is, the inner layers must be revealed.
A person can have more than one identity to be recognized as but when identity are thought of, people will mostly focus on the external markers of identity; what we can see on our self, physically.
Some of the strengths of the social identity theory are that; throughout the years it has supported many empirical studies, it has also demonstrated the social categorization in intergroup behaviors, allowed us to differentiate between social and personal identities and has provide explanations for other areas of psychology (conformity). A weaknesses of the Social identity theory is that its application is restricted in the sense that it has very low ecological validity. Another weakness is that SIT favors situational factors rather than dispositional is not supported by evidence. The social Identity theory can be used to how to explain how we form our social and personal identities in the terms of in and out groups. SIT can also be used to explain why there is conflict between humans and different societies.