Proindex Fund Case Study

2343 Words5 Pages

1. Return and Risk Characteristics of ProIndex Fund
Over the previous five years, the return of the ProIndex fund have outperformed the S&P 500 index, as the 5-year-return is nearly 3 times than the benchmark and the annualised return is nearly 2 times than the benchmark. It means ProIndex fund has a significant increase in value within that period. However, the ProIndex Fund has a higher standard deviation which means it is more risk than the S&P 500 index. Especially for the annualised standard deviation, it is approximately 10% higher than the benchmark. The correlation coefficient between the ProIndex and benchmark is about 0.65 which means both two variables are positive changing consistently, but there are still some other factors which have impacts on the relationship between two variables as the correlation is less than 1. Furthermore, the higher beta, 1.0132, which is more than 1 and it may be one of the reasons for high risk as well since it is more sensitive to the market change. It means that the ProIndex fund would increase by 1.0132% if the market increased by 1%.
On the other hand, all Jensen 's alpha, Sharpe ratio and Treynor measure are used to indicate the risk-adjusted measurement of performance. Firstly, …show more content…

The active investment management is the investing style which the portfolio managers believe that the market is not efficient and the mispricing is existing. Therefore, they could outperform the market and gain the excess return through a series of investing strategy, such as stock selection and market timing. On the opposite, passive investment management is the one which the portfolio managers believe that the market is efficient and no one can beat the market so that there is no excess return. As a result, the passive portfolio managers always seek to replicate the performance of the market index to make

Open Document