Princess Stroop

755 Words2 Pages

We multitask every day. We do homework while we watch TV or text while we listen to our friend. If you have done this, you have probably also noticed that you do not get your homework done as quickly or you are missing some detail of the story your friend told. Simply said, we cannot fully pay attention to multiple things at once. Interference is based on the idea that a person only has limited attentional resources. This idea explains why we are only able to concentrate on essentially one thing at a time, and even if we are trying really hard to do one task, we are distracted by other stimuli around us. When this is an automatic distraction, it is considered interference. An example of an automatic distraction is words. We are reading everywhere we go, whether we like to or not, we automatically do it.
The Stroop task examines interference that occurs when a person is given the task to say the color of a word while the word reads a different color (Stroop 1935). For example, if the word ‘red’ was written in blue ink, then the person is supposed to say ‘blue.’ This is an example of the incongruent or experimental condition, where a color word was presented in a different color and participants were told to state the color ink that the word was written in. Participants were told to simply name the color of colored squares for the control condition. Reaction times were slower in the incongruent condition. These results show that interference is present in this task in that participants in the incongruent condition automatically read the word instead of naming the color. This is shown by the fact that it took longer for participants to do the experimental condition rather than the control (Stroop 1935). This study can be slightly cr...

... middle of paper ...

... significantly. I say that interference will still occur because of the original Stroop task that shows the automatic process of reading will take over. I say that the results will not be as significant however because of the Houwer and Hermans experiment that shows pictorial stimuli is more potent than linguistic stimuli. I kept the stimuli neutral to prevent emotion effects as were tested in the Williams, Mathews, and MacLeod study.

Works Cited

Blakemore, J. E. O. (2003). Children's beliefs about violating gender norms: Boys shouldn't look like girls, and girls shouldn't act like boys. Sex Roles, 48(9-10), 411-419.
Herlitz, A., Nilsson, L. G., & Bäckman, L. (1997). Gender differences in episodic memory. Memory & cognition, 25(6), 801-811.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of experimental psychology, 18(6), 643.

Open Document