Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media + obesity + essay
The correlation between obesity and advertising
Media + obesity + essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media + obesity + essay
Primary prevention is an essential part of public health that focuses on encouraging activities designed to prevent the development of pathological conditions and disease (Coreil,2010,p.8). Often, primary prevention is promoted via media and information campaigns that aim to raise public awareness of healthy lifestyles. Poor nutrition, one of the most common causes of chronic disease (CDC, 2010), has been the focus of many of these campaigns. In a society where individuals are heavily influenced by the media, it is important to examine the results of these media campaigns to see what effects they are having on the individual.
Public health media and information campaigns around nutrition and individual eating habits can have both positive
…show more content…
A lot of messages about healthy eating habits and obesity reflect on individual choice; such as choosing healthier food options, exercising, drinking more water, etc. When these ads or campaigns put an emphasis on chronic diseases such as obesity, being preventable it causes a negative attitude and stigma towards this condition (Puhl & Huer, 2010). This can impact an overweight individual both physically and psychologically. While some media ads aim to promote healthy behaviors such as the NYC “Don’t’ Drink Yourself Fat” campaign, the message also has negative outcomes. The message is to encourage residents to drink more water or choose a beverage that is more nutritional. By using the word “fat” it creates a stigma of being overweight (Fairchild, 2015), and by “pouring on the pounds”, it supports the idea that being overweight is a choice. If an individual is exposed to the negative attitudes that society puts on them for being overweight, this can cause negative emotions such as low self esteem and stress and put them at risk for psychological diseases (i.e.,depression) or continuing to engage in unhealthy …show more content…
Individuals have reported feeling judged or that all their health issues are a result of their weight, which is not always the case. This can then result in health issues being over looked or not properly diagnosed. This can create a barrier in communication between a patient and provider, which then lowers the quality of the care they are receiving.
Overall, these articles provided information that there are both positive and negative outcomes in response to public health media and information campaigns around nutrition and individual eating habits. By focusing on prevention and creating messages that emphasize on the benefits of healthy behaviors and lifestyles, I feel that they can impact an individual more than using a fear tactic approach. It is my belief that the evidence of public health campaigns has more positive outcomes than
The article I chose to analyze is titled Get Fit With the Grizzlies: A Community-School-Home Initiative to Fight Childhood Obesity, which focused on social and physical health related determinants in their strategy to confront childhood obesity and promote change. The research done by C. Irwin, R. Irwin, Miller, Somes, and Richey (2010) in regards to the development of a community health promotion program has similarities to various aspects of the nutrition group’s video and components of their health promotional program structure. As previously noted, social and physical determinants to health aided in the process of development and helped determine societal needs, as depicted by this group’s population of interest. The population that the nutrition group used, involved 9-10 year old boys, who were already in a pre-established group who shared common interest i.e. cub scouts, were learning about nutrition in other areas of their life, parents actively participated and were present, presentation provided to them in a familiar environment i.e. cub scout meeting, and were motivated to participate in this program by earning a pin.
According to Mark Dolliver, “foods account for 39 percent of TV advertising seen by 2-7 year olds, 95 percent of that seen by 8-19s and 92 percent of that seen by 13-17s.On a typical day, the 2-7 year olds are exposed to 4:51 minutes of food commercials.” (Dolliver, 2007. p.1) Dolliver used statistics to show much how children are seeing these commercials. Throughout the rest of the article he talks about the increasing amounts of time that children spend watching television and the types of foods that are being advertised. Depending on the family dynamic in the household, children could be watching more television than the statistics that Dolliver presents in his study. This is what would be characterized as the advertisement of obesity in todays society. Before televisions were made, there were print advertisements that contributed to the purchasing of junk or fast foods like the 1956 Canada Dry Ginger Ale Print Ad. Although for 1956, there is not a lot of information about the obesity epidemic, it contributes to how powerful advertisements can be. These advertisements whether it is from the 1950s or if it is from today, largely influence the food quality that children are wanting or expecting. When children are exposed to television advertisements about unhealthy products in large quantities, they are more susceptible to the risk of obesity. Television
Radley Balko, The author of the essay “What You Eat is Your Business”, would agree that in order to stop obesity, we must turn this public problem around and make it everyone’s individual responsibility. Instead of inflicting the importance of personal ownership, government officials, politicians and congress make obesity a public problem by prohibiting junk food in school vending machines, federal funding for new bike trails and sidewalks, and restrictive food marketing to children. Overall I agree that this manipulation of food options is not the proper way to fight obesity, however, I think that government should inform people about the food they are eating because then they have no excuses for not taking responsibility of the actions.
Obesity is a serious problem that increases year after year and affects the lives of many Americans. It is a problem that needs to be eradicated, but who is responsible for this problem? Some argue that individuals are responsible for their own weight; that it is a private concern. Some others, on the other hand, argue that it is a public concern; therefore, the government should play a significant role to stop reduce obesity from the public domain. They also argue that advertisements for junk food are factors that increase obesity. As persuasive as the advertisements can be and even with the help of the government, it is our decision to not eat healthy and end up in a state of obesity.
Nutrition and health have become more popular in today 's society. Our generation is becoming more and more indebted to the idea of being healthy and eating nutritious meals. However, in “The American Paradox,” by Michael Pollan he argues that our unhealthy population is preoccupied with nutrition and the idea of eating healthy than their actual health. He also mentions the food industry, nutrition science and how culture affects the way we eat and make food choices. While Pollan is right about all these factor that affect our eating habits, there is more to it than that. Convenience, affordability and social influence also affects our food choices making them inadequate.
There are several different approaches to changing the way people eat or think about foods. Not only do people need to be educated on nutrition and healthy lifestyles, they also need to be shown that it not something that is targeting just them. By implementing national regulations on nutrition in schools and offering programs to educate
Low-income youth and adults are exposed to disproportionately more marketing and advertising for obesity-promoting products that encourage the consumption of unhealthful foods and discourage physical activity (Tazi, 2010). These advertisements are a particularly strong sawyer on the diets, and purchases of children, who are the unfortunate targets of many marketing schemes (Tazi, 2010). Many people at or below poverty level cannot afford health care, or if health care is available to them, it is low quality and not always what they need (Tazi, 2010). This results in lack of diagnosis and treatment of emerging chronic health problems like obesity (Tazi, 2010).
According to “Burger Battles” from the Weekly Reader, obesity is defined as a person whose weight is 20 percent higher than recommended for their height (Burger Battles 1). When this condition begins to affect children lives, it is then known as childhood obesity. Within the United States of America, around 15 percent of children are considered to be obese (Holguin 3). Increasing tremendously, this outbreak has actually tripled in the amount of obese teen and doubled in children up to the age of thirteen (Burger Battles 2). One of the factors that is usually overlooked in the cause for obesity is the role of television. Not only does it reduce the amount of physical activity, the advertisements and commercials are targeting innocent viewers. In a survey completed by Gary Ruskin of Commercial Alert, the average child watches nearly 19 hours and 40 minutes of television a week (Ruskin 2). With that amount of time spent watching television, advertisements for fast food will be entering the children’s minds.
This article’s main claim is that providing healthy food options in fast food menus allows individuals to perceive the food on the menu overall as healthy; and therefore enhances the likelihood that they will over consume unhealthy food options as well. Downs supports her argument by first providing context and introduces the question why “labels in restaurants do not change behavior”? (429). She finds that “restaurants who have provided nutritional labeling did not change consumer behavior nor did consumers take the opportunity to read them as well” (429). She notes that this critical because fast food has been referred to as one of the reasons behind the rise of obesity in the United States. In addition, she states that her findings about
Throughout this position paper there are some key recommendations made by The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics about how to improve the diets and nutritional status by specifically using the total diet approach.1 One key recommendation is that nutrition messages tend to be more effective when they are focused on positive ways to make changes overtime, opposed to listing specific foods that are to be avoided completely.1 Foods should also not be labeled “good” or “bad” because it can result in negative attitudes and poor judgments.1 Instead of having people cut certain foods out of their diets completely it is more effective to teach the concepts of moderation and proportionality.1 This position paper also mentions programs that already support the total diet approach such as MyPlate, the White House’s Let’s Move campaign, Nutrition Facts labels, nutrients intake recommendations, and Healthy People
Primary prevention are means necessary to prevent health problems before they occur, and it involves health promotion. The purpose of primary prevention is to reduce an individual’s susceptibility to an illness by strengthening the individual’s capacity to withstand physical, emotional, and environmental stressors (Harkness & Demarco, 2016). Examples of primary prevention for obesity include education about proper diet and exercise before someone becomes obese. Another example is to educate people about the potential health risks of obesity (Lundy & Janes, 2001). Secondary prevention addresses pathology, and is aimed at early detection through diagnosis (Harkness & Demarco, 2016). This level of prevention focuses on identifying groups of individuals who have early symptoms of disease or condition so that they can receive prompt treatment. Examples of secondary prevention for health consequences of obesity include: blood pressure screenings and blood sugar testing (Lundy & Janes, 2001). Tertiary prevention consists of activities designed around rehabilitation. This level of prevention has a goal to restore the individual back to his/her optimal level of functioning. Examples of tertiary prevention include: regular exercise and healthy eating patterns for individuals with obesity, hypertension and diabetes (Lundy & Janes,
In recent discussions of obesity, one controversial issue has been if the medical condition is a disease that needs treatment or if people themselves are the cause because of poor lifestyle choices. On the one hand, many organizations including the AMA (American Medical Association) argue that obesity is a disease and people diagnosed with it should be treated by doctors and prescribed medicine. On the other hand, many people argue that obesity shouldn’t be considered an illness because they say it is only a risk factor to other life threatening problems and it is preventable. My perspective is that obesity is a preventable risk factor to other diseases, but the condition of being extremely overweight itself is not because it is controllable.
America 's obesity epidemic continues to increase annually. People with different social statuses will be affected more so than others. While the American people continue to buy unhealthy foods, the food industry are profiting in the millions from the ignorance and consumerism of the public. Fast food, when consumed frequently, can cause poor health, poor nutrition and weight gain. As a result of these eating habits an individual could obtain a diverse amount of chronic health problems. However, these problems can easily be avoided by simply eating healthier foods. Unfortunately, the general public is not aware that by simply eating healthier and exercising more can lower the risk of getting these diseases. It is vital to educate the masses on the effects of fast food on their bodies. The United States needs to make changes for its citizens before the parents will be the first generation to bury their young.
Millionaire food companies compel and attract customers through advertisements. Wonderful presentations and happy actors on TV are strategically used to state the normality to eat a tempting 2000 calories packed burger. The Advertisements is the secret weapon of the monopoly of these companies. “The processed-food industry should be seen as a public health menace” views by Kelly Brownell, from a Yale University professor of psychology and public health (Moss 3). Today, tobacco advertisements upset the parents of children, but poor diet advertisements are primarily ignored. (Moss
If one asked “What is media literacy?” a majority of people would be puzzled. Some would say that it is the ‘written’ part of media that is not usually seen or a written layout of how media should be produced. The bulk of people would say they have no idea what media literacy is. People in today’s society should be informed about media literacy. Society should be informed of what media literacy exactly is and how it applies to the field of communications.