Primaporta Sculpture Analysis

1608 Words4 Pages

We have all at one time or another read or studied about Augustus of Primaporta, Commodus dressed as Hercules, or most likely about Michelangelo’s David and their importance in Roman history. All of these sculptures have been beautifully carved and balanced with unity that really gives us an idea of what Roman sculptures were supposed to look like. Roman artists used the Greek idealism and perfection as well as a combination of Roman realism to create beautiful images of their gods or rulers. The sculpture, Juno Regina, found at the James Madison University Lisanby Museum is a marble sculpture with the same structures and ideas as typical Roman sculptures found during her time period. The Juno Regina statue shows realism and a sense of balance as well as history that is often found in the Roman sculptures. As the Roman Empire expanded in size, they started to touch ways with the Greeks who greatly influenced …show more content…

She is usually wearing a diadem and/or a veil. The sculpture at James Madison University does not have a veil or a libation bowl and she is only holding a scroll, not a scepter. That is the one thing that this sculpture does not have in common with other common Juno Regina sculptures. Why they didn’t add this could be because they simply did not finish or they just forgot and didn’t think it was too important to have. The real reason is unknown but because of her body, it is known that she is Juno Regina (June Regina).
The history of Ancient Rome is always fascinating to us as we study it from third grade all the way up until college. Understanding the history behind the gods and goddesses of Roman religion allows us to understand how and why these Roman sculptures were made. I think the Juno Regina sculpture is an interesting piece of work and is something that people in art history classes should really take the time to look and

Open Document