Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Product pricing and strategies
Product pricing and strategies
Product pricing and strategies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Product pricing and strategies
1. Introduction
Strategic interaction is a term that is broadly used to identify a process that seeks to involve several parties in achieving a common goal, relying heavily on effective communication to make progress in pursuing that goal. As strategic interaction is being related to the business world. This type of activity can prove to be very effective in a number of situations such as retail, business planning, managing and creating a marketing or effort in creating public relations, or even in general operation of a production facility. The examples of strategic interaction in business include price wars between companies, wage bargaining, bidding for UTMS or other licences and many more. Therefore, one of the key elements in strategic
…show more content…
2). This situation occurs when two or more firms of an industry tend to reduce or change their own prices so that they can stand out in the industry. In return this helps them to increase their market share and gain more profit, which is then followed by other competitive firms. Price fixing plays a major role in a price war. In some industry, state of oligopoly is quite apparent. Which results in forcing small business to walk out of the market. Bhattacharya, (1996) and Busse,(2000) have studied that companies suffer losses in terms of margins, consumer equity, and ability to innovate, fall victim to substitutes, and even face bankruptcy due to highly competitive market which ultimately results in price war. Initially consumers may be benefited from lower prices, may develop unrealistic reference prices and suffer from lower quality products in the long term. (Rao et al, 2000) have studied that the battleground for price wars extends far beyond a classic example involving the airline and energy businesses as price wars are seen to break out in all kinds of market and businesses.
A real world example of this is in the telecom industry of India, which has gone through various phases since its
Although firms in oligopolies have competitors, they do not face so much competition that they are price takers (as in perfect competition). Hence, they retain substantial control over the price they charge for their goods (characteristic of monopolies). In my discussion I will use the Australian airline industry to present how oligopolies operate, and to show the different behaviours and strategies that arise from the interdependence of firms. I will mainly concentrate on the domestic airline market in Australia. The domestic airline market consists of a duopoly of two firms, Qantas and Virgin Blue.
Rivalry among established firms is fierce. There are several factors that illustrate this: established market players (6.1). The product is highly standardized and the switching costs of the customers are low. Players are aggressive (6.2)
For many companies, the phases started and ended at different times, depending on the state of technology and the firm’s ability to react and capitalize on market opportunities. Chandler further noted two facets of industrial growth:
Price gouging is increasing the price of a product during crisis or disaster. The price is increased due to temporal increase in demand while supply remains constrained. In many jurisdictions, price gauging is widely considered as immoral and is illegal. However, from a market point of view, price gouging is a correct outcome of an efficient market.
But since " price wars" only lead to a loss in revenue for these firms
Firms with market power or monopolies are often seen as detrimental for customers and economic welfare. According to the neoclassical theory, the market power of monopolies and oligopolies is potentially higher than that of firms in monopolistic or perfect competition since they have to face very limited competition, if any (Ferguson and Ferguson 1994). In monopolistic or perfect competition can make supernormal profits in the short term but eventually other firms will enter the market and offer alternative products that reduce the demand for the established firm’s products (Sloman et al., 2013 p. 177). Dissimilarly, this is not the case for dominant firms or monopolies; the lack of competition allows them to set prices and make supernormal profits increasing the perception that big companies are “bad” for consumers. As shown by the graphs in Figure 1 and 2, there are substantial differences in the competitive and monopoly markets. In a competitive environment, the equilibrium is reached where demand meets supply. In a monopolistic market, thanks to the establishment of higher prices and the production of lower quantities, monopolies or dominant firms make supernormal profits; additionally, there is a deadweight loss and some consumers who were willing to pay lower prices wil...
middle of paper ... ... ms between different regions and departments. The objectives are easily achieved when good communications are applied. Good communications also help to solve complicated structures of the company. Most of the disadvantages are sorted out.
John G. S., 2008: Strategically thinking about the subject of Strategy [e-journal] 9(4) p.2 Available through:
An oligopolistic market has a small number of sellers dominating market share and therefore barriers to entry are high. These sellers are highly competitive and do not act independently of each other. Access to information is limited so sellers can only speculate of their competitor’s actions. Sellers will take advantage of competitor’s price changes in order to increase market share.
Now, after having explained the various types of price discrimination, we can tackle the question of whether firms should price discriminate or not. This can be done by analyzing the benefits and drawbacks of price discrimination on firms as well as on consumers and society. So, first of all, as already mentioned above, firms should price discriminate in order to increase their revenue and consequently profits as price discrimination allows them to capture consumer surplus. In addition, first price discrimination (perfect price discrimination) brings economic efficiency since it eliminates deadweight loss which is "the reduction in consumer's surplus and producer's surplus that results when the output of a product is restricted to less than the optimum efficient level that would prevail under perfect competition" (Davies, Lowes and Pass, 2000).
In a business, communication not only takes place between the business and their buying customers, but also with their suppliers, within themselves and all of the stakeholders involved in the business. This includes all of the internal and external customers.
The second market structure is a monopolistic competition. The conditions of this market are similar as for perfect competition except the product is not homogenous it is differentiated; thus having control over its price. (Nellis and Parker, 1997). There are many firms and freedom of entry into the industry, firms are price makers and are faced with a downward sloping demand curve as well as profit maximizers. Examples include; restaurant businesses, hotels and pubs, specialist retailing (builders) and consumer services (Sloman, 2013).
There is increased competition- This is a consequence of capitalism. Increased competition leads to improvement in terms of quality and efficiency of production. It also leads to low prices of products in the market, as producers want to have a larger share of the consumer market. In a capitalistic perspective, businesses that produce high quality products at a low price enjoy a larger market share.
It encompasses all those activities in which one business builds relationships with other businesses for efficiently managing several of their business functions. Thus it involves co...
What is a monopolist, and what is required in order for a monopolist to earn profits in the long run? How is government involved with the creation of barriers to entry?