Prayer had a great impact on school students but many parents had divided opinions on what their religion was. The disadvantages to prayer in public schools were: parents felt that their freedom to make decisions for their children was being prohibited, parents had different religious beliefs and didn’t want their children to have separate beliefs, and last parents felt as though biblical religion was being forced on their children. Parents often felt that if they were living in America then they were free to make their own decisions concerning religion. Many Americans had different religious beliefs and didn’t want their children being taught differently from what was being taught at home. As the feuds became greater, laws were produced which restricted prayer in schools.
There are many harmful effects of allowing or not allowing prayer in public schools. Besides the controversial court cases between the school systems and the ACLU and the effects of the students and faculty, no side can win indefinitely. Religion complicates the educational environment. Children can become distracted by the role religion plays with the teachers, instructors, and administrators. Children and young adults are extremely impressionable.
Some people believe that teaching about religion should not be allowed considering it violates the separation of church and state, but that is not true. There are many issues regarding religion in public schools, however exercising your personal religion independently is not one of them. (Leitch, 1) Many believe that public schools are for educating, not proselytizing. Mixing religion and school is not appropriate since schools are public and religion is private. Public schools are open to everyone, whether Catholic, Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, Atheist or Christian.
Along very similar lines, prayer has been removed in many instances from convocations in public schools. If prayer in school is going to happen, it must be led by students and generally must be silent. If a student wants to pray in school it must be silent and personal (Allabouthistory.org). In this specific case, a student’s religious rights were violated, therefore, also violating the constitution. School prayer ‘infringes the Constitutional rights of others” (Yahoo.com).
This hits home hard to a person who may be Christian and would not like to see her children surrounded by Jewish prayer every day. This reasoning makes the people for school prayer understand what it is like for those who do not support it without insulting their beliefs. Gaylo... ... middle of paper ... ...onse. It is necessary to question the role of religion in this essay. The main point of her argument is that school prayer is an invasion of our civil rights.
The banning of books in school curriculum has also been debated since parents see certain books as inappropriate while others argue that banning them hinders student learning. Against the censorship of books in schools, Fenice Boyd and Nancy Bailey, authors of Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, believe that banning books creates a barrier between students and intellectual development (Boyd and Bailey, 655). Banning books from schools and removing them from the curriculum prevents students from exploring different ideas and developing creativity and critical thinking skills. In order to understand how banning books in schools affect student learning, it is important to understand why books are banned in the first place. If parents describe a book as inappropriate or offensive for children, they can complain about it to the school district to have it banned.
Many readers don’t realize the privileges we receive because we are part of an organized religion, however, nonorganized religion 's members can see the difference. That’s why the “Humanist Studies [feel] that the state government should do more to educate the public about existing protections for and limitations of the free exercise of religion”("Religious Freedom” 1). Americans may have total freedom, but certain situations may limit our freedom. Some places need to be limited in order for children to go to school without the parents fear of religious bullying or conversion to another religion. Students who want to embrace their religion in school can do that by meeting others with same religion or even creating a club for all students of the same religion who then can meet up and discuss various
There is not enough emphasis on the biblical roots of our country. Religious knowledge is also necessary to teach about democracy. Schools are already allowed to teach democracy, how can anyone expect students to see everyone’s opinions if they didn’t learn all about the other religions and sides a person can be coming from? Experts also say that for american government to be taught and fully understood, then students need to fully know that it’s roots were religion. While religion is a very sensitive topic, other subjects such as politics and government are too, and yet those subjects are still discussed and taught in schools without a problem.
Religion in schools is prohibited. Students are restricted from prayer because it is deemed unconstitutional to share individual beliefs in schools. The right for students to have religious exercise and expression are intrinsically important for them to form bonds with one another (Religion in Public Schools 1). Taking away religion is taking away unity and common beliefs between students. Imagine taking religion away is like taking pep rallies away.
Expressing religion in schools is unnecessary and can cause tension; therefore, it should not be permitted in public schools. Religion in public schools is unnecessary. It provides a conflicting viewpoint with certain subjects and separates some students based on a simple thing such as heritage. Ellen Johnson, president of American Atheists Inc., says, “While federal and other guidelines [placed upon students regarding religion] may be technically correct, we have found that religious groups often interpret their tone and content selectively, seeing a ‘green light’ for numerous practices, some of which are constitutionally suspect” (Johnson). Open expression can create stress for the teachers who may have to make exceptions for certain rules or allow their students to leave class at certain times for religious reasons.