The Language Wars have been waged in the realm of English Literature, Language and Linguistics for years. Both sides of the argument are staunch believers in their position, but are more than willing to concede points to the other sides’ favour. In Bryan A. Garner’s essay, “Making Peace in the Language Wars”, he describes himself as a ‘descriptive prescriber’ (Garner, Making Peace in the Language Wars 2008, 270), and offers a truce that fulfils both sides of the argument as the crux of his essay. While the separate sides of the argument are relatively easy to define, it seems that no one sticks to them religiously, and the argument is between individuals fighting over individual points. The two sides are that of the descriptivist and that of the prescriptivist.
David Foster Wallace has coined the term SNOOT, which correlates directly with what prescriptivism at its most strict is: “SNOOT (n) (highly colloq) is this reviewer’s nuclear family’s nickname a clef for a really extreme usage fanatic, the sort of person whose ideas of Sunday fun is to hunt for mistakes in the very prose of Safire’s column” (Wallace 2005, 69). Garner, on the other hand, makes a very simple definition for prescriptivism: “Prescribers seek to guide users of a language…on how to handle words as effectively as possible” (Garner, Making Peace in the Language Wars 2008, 266). Descriptivists are not the ‘opposite’ of prescriptivists, but they are at loggerheads with the ideals of prescriptivism since descriptivists simply seek to describe language as it is used. Garner, again, is succinct in his definition of descriptivists: “Describers seek to discover the facts of how native speakers actually use their language” (Garner, Making Peace in the Language Wars 2008...
... middle of paper ...
... this essay, however, it seems like there will never be a truce between prescriptivists and descriptivists because status and perceptions of self are inflammatory and extremely emotional.
Works Cited
Garner, Bryan A. "Making Peace in the Language Wars." In Garner on Language and Writing, by Bryan A. Garner, 266 - 285. Chicago: American Bar Association, 2008.
Garner, Bryan A. "Tending to Your Snootitude." In Garner on Language and Writing, by Bryan A. Garner, 211 - 221. Chicago: American Bar Association, 2008.
Orwell, George. "Politics and the English Language." In Essays, edited by Bernard Crick, 1-9. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2000.
Pinker, Steven. The Language Instinct. Penguin, 1994.
Wallace, David Foster. "Authority and American Usage." In Consider the Lobster and Other Essays, by David Foster Wallace, 66 - 127. New York City: Little, Brown, and Company, 2005.
Simpson, J. A., and E. S. C. Weiner. The Oxford English dictionary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1989.Print.
Lowe, Peter J. Texas Studies in Literature & Language; Spring2007, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p21-44, 24p Academic Search Complete Ebesco. Web. 23 July 2011
The Life of Language: Papers in Linguistics in Honor of William Bright. Berlin [etc.]. Mouton De Gruyter, 1998. Print. The.
Parini, Jay ed. American Writers, Supplement V. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons - The Gale Group. 2000. 275-93.
Baron, Dennis. The English Language Amendment: Backgrounds And Prospects. 1988. ERIC. Web. 28 Nov. 2014.
Treichler, Paula A. “Language and Ambiguity.” The Awakening, A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. Margo Culley.
Garner, Bryan A. Black's Legal Dictionary. 7th Ed. St. Paul, Minnesota : West Publishing , 2009. Print.
Howe, Tom. "George Orwell." British Writers Volume VII. Ed. Ian Scott-Kilvert. New York: Scribner, 1984. 273-287.
S.I. Hayakawa and Alan R Hayakawa, Words with Built-in Judgments. Language Awareness, Readings for College Writers. Ed. Paul Escholz, Alfred Rosa, Virginia Clark. Bedfort/St. Martin’s: Boston, New York, 2004. 229-234
Birk, Newman. “Selection,Slanting,and Charged Language.” Language Awarness:Reading for College Writers.Ed Paul Escholz, Alfred Rosa, and Virginia Clark. 11th ed. Boston:Bedford, 2013. 223-31. Print
Orwell, George. “Politics and the English Language.” George Orwell: Critical Essays. London: Harvill Secker: 2009. 270-286. Print.
Works Cited for: Orwell, George. 1984. The 'Standard' of the ' London: Penguin Books, 2008. Print. The.
Cerjak ,The English Journal, Vol. 76, No. 5 (Sep., 1987), pp. 55-57 Published by: National Council of Teachers of English
...rom Fiction." Making Sense of Language: Readings in Culture and Communication. Comp. Susan D. Blum. New York, NY [etc.: Oxford UP, 2013. 443-58.
Language as a dynamic structure is exposed to constant development, transformation and alteration. Media, society, culture, science, technology and politics are the core factors that contribute towards language evolution. Due to numerous linguistic and extra linguistic factors, newly coined units in the language are in the process of entering and influencing the English language. These new units, known as neologisms, serve as our guidance in understanding the never-ending evolution in the English language. Furthermore, neologisms ease each individual’s process of coping with changes by creating mental bridges between the old and the contemporary. The English language vocabulary is facing constant change, as neologisms enter in a blink of an eye through the media. The mass media being the major source and ground on which English neologisms are coined, plays a significant role of intermediary between the English population as active consumers and the language itself.