Poverty and Inequality

1851 Words4 Pages

Poverty and inequality exist in every developed culture and often are only patched in order for society to continue upwardly. Poverty and inequality in the United States exists for many reasons; reasons that very from the prospective lens. Interpretive theories in particular ask us to question our reality and its constructs. Interpretive theories require us to looks at the world as a social realm, one that we created and constantly change. Interpretive theories study the relationship between power and the construction of social roles as well as the invisible collection of patterns and habits that make up domination, (Delgado & Stefanic, 2001). Susan Kemp argues that the view of the world is dominated by the experiences of white western males often of the bourgeoisie, (2001). Within the social realm, the way we look at our world and those in it varies drastically. Two specific interpretive theories view poverty and inequality in different ways, but both on the basis of social construction. In these theories, things have meanings only on what we designate them to mean, without definitions they wouldn’t exist. Both race and gender are social constructs that in this modern world often work interchangeably through the social realm. Society and the social realm are under constant negotiation and change. While often forgotten race and gender are social constructs and not biological aspects of humans. Different racial groups experience reality in separate, unique ways. These differences occur at all levels: micro, mezzo and macro, (Swignoski &Raheim, 2011). Critical Race Theory and Feminist theory look at the social realm through specific lenses and offer explanations for many social issues, including poverty and inequality. Critical ... ... middle of paper ... .... Poverty statistically is an issue for black women. They are often poorer and less educated than their white counterparts. Which begs the questions, why? And how do we fix it? When it comes to poverty and inequality, there are many possible answers to how we got here; there are plenty of questions on what’s the best way to go from here. I feel that neither feminism nor CRT better describe our issues of poverty and inequality, they actually work better together. The issues of poverty and inequality have long complicated histories that can only be described in complicated ways. I can simply be hopeful that its ultimate solution is not as complicated, though if this was conflict or functionalist theory, then there will always be this conflict. With the Arab Spring and the Occupy movements, the future of poverty and inequality may just be changing before our eyes.

Open Document