Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Global networks; globalization
Global governance and the role of non-state actors
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Global networks; globalization
There have been assertions amongst some that the Westphalian nation-state system is dead. The truth of this statement is somewhat obscure and may be a bit extreme to what we are seeing in the international arena today. The fall of the bipolar world of the Cold War and the now diminishing power of the United States which is coinciding with the rise of smaller powers have many questioning what the world system is going to look like. Add to this the rise of the non-state actors that are having more and more influence in the international arena. Increasingly major policy areas are being influenced by international forces. The question posed here and which this paper endeavours to answer is, are we entering an era of post-Westphalian governance? The hypothesis put forward in this paper is two prong in nature as the answer to the question is yes, we are moving towards an era of post-Westphalian governance. However this answer is with slight hesitation as the shift towards it is happening slowly. The analysis is based on the idea of diffusion, which “refers to the processes where national policy makers voluntarily, that is without being formally obligated by international agreements or forced by external actors to adopt a certain policy innovation...” expressed by Per Olof Busch and Helge Jörgends. That is to say that in investigating post-Westphalian governance we will first examine the increasing trend of policy shifting towards certain global governors that takes away from the traditional role of the state that evolve out of the Treaty of Westphalia. This will be done by exploring the rise of the transnational networks, international organizations and supranational entities, and then rise of non state actors and the roles they have...
... middle of paper ...
...policy making have slowly eroded the rigid structure of state sovereignty. However the state still maintains a strong role in the international system and many areas still remain state-centric. Whether the state will continue to play a small role in the post-Westphalian era is yet to be discerned. What is certain is that the role of the state is slowly changing and may eventually lead to its demise.
Works Cited
Sasser, Erika N., Aseem Prakash, Benjamin Cashore and Graeme Auld, “Direct Targeting as an NGO Political Strategy: Examining Private Authority Regimes in the Forestry Sector,” Business and Politics 8:3 (2006), http://faculty.washington.edu/aseem/direct%20targeting.pdf
Slaughter, Anne-Marie “A New World Order” Prince University Press 2005,
“Who Governs the Globe?” ed. Deborah D. Avant, Martha Finnemore and Susan K. Sell Cambridge University Press 2010,
Edkins, Jenny, and Maja Zehfuss. Global Politics: A New Introduction. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2009. Print.
Frieden, Jeffry A., David A. Lake, and Kenneth A. Schultz. World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2013. Print.
Flory, Harriette, and Samuel Jenike. A World History: The Modern World. Volume 2. White Plains, NY: Longman, 1992. 42.
Dennis Pirages and Christine Sylvester (eds.), Transformations in the Global Political Economy (London: Macmillan, 1989).
Ellis, Elizabeth Gaynor, and Anthony Esler. World History: The Modern Era. Boston: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007. Print.
Having understood that the world has taken the form it has through the domination or imperialism of Western countries, it is said that they are the agents that have greatly influenced the world; their ideologies in addition to their political as well as economic influences have spread across the globe through time (Headrick, 1981).
Each of these normative models has their strengths and weaknesses, with some favouring inclusivity at the expense of being politically efficacious while others perhaps place a needless amount of importance on obtaining a single consensus. Nevertheless, the more pressing issue is whether they can be adequately applied to a transnational context. These models, as well as their theoretical underpinnings, are grounded in a system of thought centred on states that are generally Westphalian. However, as will be shown in the next section, globalization has fundamentally altered the political landscape in which the public sphere finds itself and whatever flaws inherent to these models that existed before are amplified when strict territorial boundaries are expanded and removed.
Baylis, Smith and Patricia Owens. 2014. The globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations. London. Oxford University Press.
The international system is an anarchical system which means that, unlike the states, there is no over ruling, governing body that enforces laws and regulations that all states must abide by. The International System in today’s society has become highly influential from a number of significant factors. Some of these factors that will be discussed are Power held by the state, major Wars that have been fought out in recent history and international organisations such as the U.N, NATO and the W.T.O. Each of these factors, have a great influence over the international system and as a result, the states abilities to “freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social, and cultural development”.
This essay will describe the characteristics of the modern nation-state, explain how the United States fits the criteria of and functions as a modern nation-state, discuss the European Union as a transnational entity, analyze how nation-states and transnational entities engage on foreign policy to achieve their interests, and the consequences of this interaction for international politics.
Non-interference is crucial under the Westphalian System; however, the ‘responsibility to protect’(R2P), an outcome of the United Nation’s (UN) Millennium Summit, reflects the increased importance of human rights. It agrees states must protect its populations from severe human rights violations and if the state is inflicting the abuses the international community is to take collective action against the perpetrator
The relationship between the role of the state and globalisation is a complex one. Globalisation, as defined by the Financial Times, is the ‘integration of economies, industries, markets, cultures and policy-making around the world.’ However this definition, and many others like it, must by default mean that as countries become more integrated the divisions between them blur. This would create a Pangaea like nation, where states are not separated, physically, economically or socially. The main argument in this essay will be whether states, (which are inherently divided by physical and economic boundaries) and the role they have to play in general society will be less relevant in an increasingly globalised world.
Krain, Matthew (2005), “AP Comparative Government and Politics Briefing Paper: Globalization,” [http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/ap05_comp_govpol_glob_42253.pdf], accessed 15 May 2012.
Interaction among the people or groups of different parts of the world kept continued in ancient, medieval period till now. But the formal establishment of international relations begins from ‘Peace of Wesphalia’ in 1648, This point of time international relations started based on sovereign states, a milestone in development of modern states. Prior to ‘Peace of Westphalia’, international relations were based on a vague hierarchy of religious order. Peace of Westphalia was done after a thirty years of bloodbath among European powers. Peace of Westphalia is known as one the best example in world history which shows the significance of international relations in establishing peace and communal harmony. After this treaty international relations became based on peaceful diplomatic procedure of resolving the issues and to establish the peace and communal harmony among and within the nations. Establishment of international organizations e.g. UNO, are the results of peaceful diplomatic procedure of international
Perhaps one of the most frequently discussed topics in international relations today is the diminishing power of the nation state and subsequent growth of a global economy. Traditionally, the state is considered to play a leading role in global affairs; however, due to advances in communications technology and the expansion of international trade following the Cold War, the world has seen the establishment of an increasing number of non-state actors in global politics. The shift away from a state-centric model of international government has produced many positive changes to global politics, but has also highlighted many issues and challenges. Through examination of the role of international organizations in resolving crises, the effectiveness and legitimacy (or lack thereof) of new methods of global governance, the achievability of global governance, and the interconnectivity of states and non-state actors in regards to global affairs, it can be determined that the state is no longer the most powerful actor in global politics. Non-state actors, particularly international organizations such as the United Nations (UN) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), have become just as powerful, if not more powerful, than states.