Post-Revolutionary Leaders

614 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Napoleon's Foreign policy

There are many strong revolutionary leaders. Yet, some struggle to become strong post-revolutionary leaders. A strong revolutionary leader is someone who cares about not only his or her country but someone who cares about the people and their lives. All the revolutionary leaders we have studied this year have demonstrated that it is not possible to become a strong post-revolutionary after being a strong one during the revolution that they participated in. One of the main reasons most revolutionary leaders don’t become strong post revolutionary leaders is because they don’t care about the people. For example, during the aftermath of the French Revolution, also during Napoleon's rule, Napoleon raised many armies(Class notes and Napoleon Homework).

Show More
Related

  • Kaonye West: A Revolutionary Leader: Kanye Omari West

    1404 Words  | 3 Pages

    “I’m living in that 21st Century, doin’ something mean to it/Do it better than anybody you ever seen do it/Screams from the haters, got a nice ring to it/I guess every superhero need his theme music.” A revolutionary leader is someone who goes against the status quo, someone who goes out the way and changes the norm of society, and someone who leaves an imprint on the world. Kanye West is a revolutionary leader because he drastically changed hip-hop/rap culture as seen by making high fashion brands popular in the hip-hop/rap industry and producing songs that confront materialism and contain relatable lyrics.

    Read More

  • The Political Upheaval In The Revolutionary Era

    298 Words  | 1 Pages

    During the political upheaval in the Revolutionary era, writers would write mostly about the politics of the war. Although in past times people would mostly write about the troubles they faced during the time, the Revolutionary changed the way writers would persuade others. In the past most times, the authors would strictly use facts or strictly write to the select few but everything changed when the colonist faced a Revolutionary War.

    Read More

  • How much does Napoleon owe to the French Revolution?

    1006 Words  | 3 Pages

    Napoleon had been influenced and guided by the revolution, but he was able to use it to his ends. One of Napoleons greatest strengths was being able to take advantage of a situation, and he certainly was able to utilize the chaos and fear of the revolution. He is forever intertwined with the French Revolution, and it with him.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The American Revolution And The French Revolution

    2174 Words  | 5 Pages

    Unlike the leaders of America, the leaders of the French did not turn out to be as positive for the country. In fact, some of these leaders caused much more harm than good. These leaders taught the French people more about what type of government would be the best option for them. One of the most radical, and extreme leaders was Maximilien Robespierre. The duration of his dictatorship was known as "Reign of Terror." He demanded a republic and soon after his demands; the monarchy was overthrown. He also felt that a constitutional government would have to wait until all the enemies of the revolution have been eliminated. To accomplish this task, he murdered close to 40,000 people, most by guillotine, and some sentenced to life in jail. The Reign of Terror was one of the most controversial, and terrifying phases of the Revolution. Some French colonists thought it to be a path to democracy; others thought it was just a attempt for Robespierre to assume dictator. The other great leader was Napoleon Bonaparte. He believed that the only way to have control in France was to put a limit on democracy. Over a period of time Napoleon 's party overthrew Robespierre 's party. Soon enough, Napoleon was dictator of France. The French soldiers who fought in the American Revolution came back from the war with new ideas and reason for revolution. These ideas included the right to take up arms against tyranny, all men should

    Read More

  • Post-French Revolution Theories of Government

    479 Words  | 1 Pages

    After the French Revolution, the nation of France wanted to take on a different type of governing. There were those who wanted to go back to the feudal system that was in place before and those who wanted a limited monarchy with a constitution. Edmund Burke and Emmanuel Sieyés were writers who had strong opinions on the both sides of the scale. Sieyés believed in the Third Estate, and believed that they could run a better nation, where as Burke said that the nobility or the Second Estate was the only people that could do that job. But as we can see Sieyés view was the one that thrived in the end.

    Read More

  • French Pre-Revolutionary Government

    789 Words  | 2 Pages

    French Pre-Revolutionary Government The ancien regime was an expression used to describe the system of government, laws and institutions which preceded the French Revolution of 1789. The system relied heavily on the 'seigneurial system', based largely on the medieval feudal system by which the monarch had absolute power, most of the clergy (first estate) and the nobility (second estate) were very wealthy, and the peasants (third estate) were oppressed by heavy taxation and made to work as virtual slaves for their landlords. It was this system which was an important contributing factor to the resentment which developed between the poor, who made up three quarters of France's population at the time, and the nobles, and eventually led to the uprising of the lower classes and revolution in 1789. The ancient regime was an outdated system which ignored the demands of social and economic progress in favour of keeping the third estate in check and attempting to ensure that France was a dominant power in Europe. In most European countries the system of feudalism had died out in the Middle Ages.

    Read More

  • Revolution DBQ Essay

    962 Words  | 2 Pages

    When people think of the term, revolution, they associate it with an overthrow or replacement of a government or political system. A revolution could also mean a change in society and the social structure, often accompanied by violence. There are many examples of revolution in history, such as the French revolution and the American Revolution in which the colonies gained independence from Britain. Revolutions are not always successful. There are aspects that must be gained in order to have a successful rebellion. In order to have an effective rebellion there must be a strong leader, someone the people could look up to, a multitude of people and persistence.

    Read More

  • French and Russian Revolutions

    569 Words  | 2 Pages

    French and Russian Revolutions Both the French and Russian revolutions occurred for two main reasons. Both of these revolutions were the direct result of bad leadership and a bad economy. These two reasons, along with other factors, caused both of these revolutions. Although they were both similar, they also had differences. A difference between the two is that the Russians had an unsuccessful "pre-revolution" in 1905.

    Read More

  • Revolutionary Influences On Politics

    1402 Words  | 3 Pages

    The development of the early republic of the United States of America had many influence from ideas on liberty, equality of men, and God-given rights to mankind. These ideas were formed during many outbreaks of riots, resistance of laws passed by British government, and the yearning for independence. All of these ideas caused many revolutions to form, dismantle of the old American government, and the formation of the one that still exists today. The ideas that came from the American Revolution helped influence the founding fathers into how to form the constitution. The French revolution also had some say in the making of the US government. Revolutionary activity and ideas helped the founding fathers form the government that we still live under today.

    Read More

  • Napoleon Betrayed the Revolution

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    The only way of determining whether Napoleon consolidated or betrayed the revolution is to explore his actions such as his military success, dictatorship and social reforms. The difficulty of this analysis is that Napoleon's motives for his actions determine whether he consolidated or betrayed the Revolution. If Napoleon betrayed the revolution, then he betrayed the ideals of liberty, equality and fraternity. For it is ideals rather than realities that Napoleon allegedly betrayed. The reality of the French revolution is 8 periods of constant change and succession of policies and leaders, with each new leader and party bringing amendments to the revolution.

    Read More

  • Henry Ford

    2306 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...ategory of lives known as revolutionaries. He was not simply and inevitable product of his time. He was original and revolutionary. He defied precedent and never once allowed the impossibilities of the past to limit the possibilities of the future. And above all he was a true patriot to the growth of the human race.

    Read More

  • Napoleon's Failure to Dominate Europe

    841 Words  | 2 Pages

    A ruler's reputation comes from the change that he inflicts upon his subjects, territory, and surrounding lands. Napoleon Bonaparte rose into power during the French Revolution, causing drastic changes not only to France, but to the rest of Europe as well. His domestic and foreign policies were not always successful, but his ability to rule was undeniable. From his rising in power and reform of France, up until his military defeat in Russia, Napoleon succeeded in gaining a considerate amount of power and control.

    Read More

  • The Hamartia of Successful Leaders of the Past

    1506 Words  | 4 Pages

    When looking at successful leaders of the past, each one had a hamartia, or a flaw, that destroyed their rule. For example, Hosni Mubarak of Egypt was one of the greatest rulers Egypt has ever had, but too much power lead to prison. Being in power for 30 years, Hosni Mubarak had an economic growth of 5-6% for the last 5 years, he kept peace for 30 years, he had no religious elements in politics, he gave freedom to leave and enter Egypt, he gave freedom to transfer money in and out of Egypt and had good relations with most of the world. After 30 years in power, Hosni Mubarak was taken out of rule and was put in jail for a court trial. When millions of Egyptians found out that he had sole 70 billion dollars, they were devastated. Many of them questioned how such a loyal and worthy leader become so corrupt, but that was his major flaw. He stole from his people and at in end, ended up in jail. Such character flaws have plagued societies from the beginning of time, dating back to the Ancient Greeks. In Sophocles’ play Polyneices and Etocles were two brothers who started off the play in war, and both ended up dying. When Creon, the king of Thebes, saw this, he ordered that Eteocles be buried but for Polyneices to be left for the dogs and wild animals to eat. Creon reasoned that Eteocles fought for his country, but Polyneices was a traitor. When Antigone, the sister of both brothers, heard the news, she was angry and frustrated. So she went and buried her brother, going against Creon’s law. Even though Antigone is Creon’s niece and his son’s wife, he sentenced her to death for going against his rule. Even though the people of Thebes thought she was right, he thought otherwise, which ended up hurting him. Thus, Creon’s pride leads to h...

    Read More

  • How To Lead A Revolution

    564 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are a lot of traits that a person must posses to become a successful leader. The examples I am about to present to you are just a hand full of the important traits. The first trait a group should look for in a revolutionary leader would have to be a strong military background, if you are going to war u must have a general of some capacity leading your forces into battle. The second most important trait that a strong leader must have is a good education, back then a good education was knowledge of literature and the ability to read. The ability to read would have given your leader a great advantage, your leader could have read a history book and he would have known what mistakes to avoid. The third most important trait is your leaders ability to command a large amount of people. If you have a leader who cannot control his own army than a defeat is inevitable. Also your leader must want to improve the well being and living conditions for all of his followers. And lastly he must be influential, he must posses the ability to sway the minds of skeptics who do not believe in him or the cause. Being influential has another benefit to it also, an influential person will leave behind people that will carry out your leaders plans in the untimely event of your leader being killed or exiled.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Gandhi And Martin Luther King

    844 Words  | 2 Pages

    The definition of a leader is a person who influences people to a common purpose. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr are examples of great leaders who brought about social change through alternative means in the 20th century. Their means were through nonviolent protests of freedom. Gandhi fought for freedom from Great Britain, and King fought for freedom from segregation and equal rights for all Americans.

    Read More

More about Post-Revolutionary Leaders

Open Document