When you picture a doctor who do you see? Do you see a charismatic young man with rugged good looks? Or do you see a man who is drug-addicted with a god complex? As it turns out the way you answer that question may have more to do with media portrayal than our society cares to admit. The history of the portrayal of doctors reflects our society and our faith in medicine, a portrayal that is far from positive.
Prior to 1954, there were not any notable TV medical dramas. The arrival of 1954 brought with it Medic, a popular show that focused on medical diagnosis and treatment. Medic reminds us of the people of the 1950s. Doctors were portrayed as unfailable, and the aim of medicine was undeniably good and just. In the 50s, for the first-time doctors
…show more content…
M*A*S*H followed several doctors through the Korean War. M*A*S*H came at such a kairotic moment, which allowed it to grow into a beast of a show. Following the Vietnam War, the American people had lost their faith, particularly in government institutions. Doctors that were unconventional, crude, and chaotic, were viewed in a new light. The idea of what a doctor should be was changing drastically in a short period of time. As Roger C. Schank reminds us “we are the stories we tell” (304). What does it say of the American people that doctors were now complicated and dynamic, who weren’t know-it-alls that solved everything? With the public’s growing unease regarding medical practice, came ER, a show that portrayed doctors as extremely flawed people. The show chose to focus on the relationships between the doctors and their less than spectacular lives. ER was cynical not only of doctors, but of life itself. Relationships never worked out, and the show had a revolving door that characters frequently moved through. Despite their numerous faults, the audience was still able to empathize with the characters. They wanted doctors who reflected them, even when they were becoming increasingly …show more content…
We used to have role models that wanted good things for their patients because they were a person and that is what they deserved. Today our favorite doctors are self-serving, with no regard to a patients’ feelings. Doctors are shown as willing to do anything to make their patients better, but only to make themselves look good. Is this indicative of who we have become? Yes, it is. Our obsession with vindictive characters, who don’t care what it takes to get to the top, accurately represent present day America. From studying doctors in the media, we can see how our nation would elect a man who has lied and cheated his way to the top. That behavior is rewarded and encouraged. In the future will TV doctors continue to get darker and more agonistic, or will come full circle with doctors who represent everything good about medicine and healthcare. My hope is that we find a middle ground; where they are portrayed as real, complex characters, but not necessarily as sex crazed narcissists. When America is able to get to that there, without tiring of the characters easily, we will be so much better
The concepts discussed within the article regarding medicalization and changes within the field of medicine served to be new knowledge for me as the article addressed multiple different aspects regarding the growth of medicalization from a sociological standpoint. Furthermore, the article “The Shifting Engines of Medicalization” discussed the significant changes regarding medicalization that have evolved and are evidently practiced within the contemporary society today. For instance, changes have occurred within health policies, corporatized medicine, clinical freedom, authority and sovereignty exercised by physicians has reduced as other factors began to grow that gained importance within medical care (Conrad 4). Moreover, the article emphasized
Grant successfully managed to treat Mr. G she comes to the realization that a doctor should not judge a patient no matter how they may act, as each patient may have a reason for acting the way they do. Dr. Grant has managed to learn how to combine her own personal experience with her doctoral skills she had learned in medical schools. Dr Grant believes. “ …[A]fter twenty-eight years of schooling, my education continues, both inside and outside the classroom” ( 183). Mr. G was the key figure in changing Dr. Grants judgement. If Mr. G had not shed light onto why he was in the hospital and how he felt stripped of his freedom to Dr. Grant she probably would have just branded him as crazy, she probably would have done the same to similar patients. As Dr. Grant states, “ … I was proud of myself for having accomplished my task… I was proud of myself because I had decided not to prejudge Mr. G” (182). Mr. G exposing his true emotions to Dr. Grant was the reason that she learned that she should not judge unique patients but instead, she should try to communicate with them and better understand so she can better help
People trust doctors to save lives. Everyday millions of Americans swallow pills prescribed by doctors to alleviate painful symptoms of conditions they may have. Others entrust their lives to doctors, with full trust that the doctors have the patient’s best interests in mind. In cases such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, the Crownsville Hospital of the Negro Insane, and Joseph Mengele’s Research, doctors did not take care of the patients but instead focused on their self-interest. Rebecca Skloot, in her contemporary nonfiction novel The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, uses logos to reveal corruption in the medical field in order to protect individuals in the future.
At this point, the movie picks up at the Bronx in 1969. Dr. Malcolm Sayers arrives at Bainbridge Hospital for an interview. Dr. Sayers is a researcher who has little experience with human patients. The idea of being a doctor in a
This requires respect and compassion and prioritizing their comfort and values. I believe that as future physicians, we must be open to the different identities and perspectives of each individual in order to try to understand their beliefs and concerns. This level of empathy allows us to connect with patients on a deeper level and treat them with better quality care. Given this, I was immediately drawn to Georgetown’s Literature and Medicine program. Having taken a similarly named course during my undergraduate career, I recognize how literature, fiction or non-fiction, can create a compelling narrative that draws us into the mind of the writer and the characters. Medically related narratives raise issues that we will be confronted with later on in our careers, such as the respective responsibilities of the patient and physician, the role of medical ethics, and the value of compassion and empathy. This program will help me to become a more reflective and empathetic individual that places the beliefs and comfort of the patient at the forefront of my professional practice, and can competently cater to the needs of a diverse
As a society we place those in the medical profession on a pedestal. They are people to be looked up to and admired. In many ways they are Gods, right here with us on earth. People put the hope and faith in doctors hoping they can perform miracles. Throughout history, doctors have indeed preformed many wonders. There were, however, some doctors that betrayed this belief and peoples trust. These doctors could be found in concentration camps such as Auschwitz and Dachau. These doctors committed unspeakable acts against the Jews and other minorities, believing that they were conducting helpful experiments. Following the holocaust, however, they were punished for their actions.
...heavy viewing of the medical drama series, Grey’s Anatomy, makes viewers more likely to be satisfied with his or her real world physicians.
Jamison describes another medical figure in her life that she referred to as Dr. M. Dr. M was Jamison’s primary cardiologist, a figure who is involved in some of the most intimate details of Jamison’s life. However, Jamison describes Dr. M by saying she, “…wasn’t personal at all” (14). Dr. M would actually record personal information about Jamison on a tape recorder, however, Jamison would hear Dr. M referring to her as “patient” instead of by her name. This example demonstrates that Dr. M was indeed putting in the minimal effort needed to keep her clients, however, no additional effort was put into the process of learning about her patients. Jamison says that, “…the methods of her mechanics [were] palpable between us…” (18). Dr. M would not even put any effort into disguising her lack of interest of getting to know Jamison. This atmosphere of apathy that is exuded by Dr. M naturally causes Jamison to retract from Dr. M, which creates an environment that is not good for cultivating
The medicine men seem to be taking extreme advantage of the people he is supposed to be taking care of. They seem to be out for more selfish pursuits as opposed to really sincerely helping the people. I could not believe that the sick had to give gifts before they could be “helped” and after they were “helped.” The fact that they experienced immense...
The number of doctors that present in the United States of America directly affects the communities that these doctors serve and plays a large role in how the country and its citizens approach health care. The United States experienced a physician surplus in the 1980s, and was affected in several ways after this. However, many experts today have said that there is currently a shortage of physicians in the United States, or, at the very least, that there will be a shortage in the near future. The nation-wide statuses of a physician surplus or shortage have many implications, some of which are quite detrimental to society. However, there are certain remedies that can be implemented in order to attempt to rectify the problems, or alleviate some of their symptoms.
This gives the reader an inside view of how a medical professional reacts to the tragedy laid out before them, and in both situations allows the audience to the join the doctor
This article will discuss a review of Grey’s Anatomy, Nip Tuck, and House. I choose to write my article on this review of Grey’s Anatomy because I am a weekly viewer and my mother watches House. I also enjoyed the shows and reading the article because I plan to go in the medical field to all of these shows have an influence on me. They make me want to go into the medical field even more because of the cases I see on them, and the all of the medical drama.
Doctor Who started running on November 23, 1963 and hasn’t stopped since. Fifty years of adventure have given us hundred of stories, twelve Doctors and too many monsters to count. Since the Doctor started running there have been many firsts and lasts, comings and goings, tearful farewells and exciting new beginnings. March 1962 was the first time the British Broadcasting Channel’s (BBC) new Head of Drama, Sydney Newman, came up with the idea of Doctor Who. Between March 1962 and June 1963 the BBC initiates a survey of published science fiction to see how the public would react. They wanted to see if the science fiction they were going to produce was relevant to that day and age.
...e gap in attitudes between pre-medicalized and modern time periods. The trends of technological advancement and human understanding project a completely medicalized future in which medical authorities cement their place above an intently obedient society.
...dred years ago is now equivalent to a small outpatient hospital visit. These huge advancements in medicine which save millions of lives every year are attributed to the medical industry.