Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of human overpopulation on the environment
Effects of human overpopulation on the environment
Outline on population control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of human overpopulation on the environment
When an elephant population exceeds what the environment can sustain, we cull them. When rabbit populations skyrocket and cause damage to their environment, we kill them off. When water hyacinths invade a body of water and upset the ecological equilibrium, we cut them back or poison them. Why then do we not do anything drastic to bring a halt to the human population explosion? Why, when the environment is clearly buckling under the demanding weight of the human population, do we not do something about it? The answer is that we are the human species and we have developed a set of guidelines outlining how humans deserve to be treated. These are our human rights. It is these rights that protect us from being sterilized against our will or killed off. Human rights protect us from exploitation but it can also be a barrier preventing necessary steps being taken to prevent the human population from reaching proportions that will have immense repercussions on the our future life on this planet.
The eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
The UN has predicted that by the year 2100 the human population will be 10.1 billion. One may question how the earth will be able to sustain such vest quantities of humans when even now, at 7.2 billion, people are living with their basic needs unfulfilled. Many understand that something must be done and it must be done quickly.
The topic of population control is a controversial one for two reasons: firstly, it is advertised as a quick fix for all the world’s problems and secondly, it is feared that the methods of population control may violate human rights. This research paper will answer the question of how can the human population be brought to ZPG while still respecting the human rights of those...
... middle of paper ...
...ndoms, the (…) followed in their footsteps preaching that the use of these methods of contraception would send them to hell.
(world health organization campaign photo)
(Solution 1: education)
The best method of bringing the world to Zero Population Growth is education. Studies have shown that educated women have less children on average than those who are not educated.
(image of women education)
(image of graph)
(Solution 2: rigorous family planning)
There are 222 million women in the developing world whose needs for family planning are unmet. This is the cause of 85% of the 80 million unintended pregnancies in this region . Family planning, such as encouraged use of contraceptives, is vital to the stabilization of the population and the reduction of poverty. This form of population control supports human rights, rather than infringing on them.
(info-posters)
Internationally, issues revolving around the female body and reproduction are extremely controversial. For a woman, her body is a very private matter. At the same time, however, a woman's body and her reproduction rights are the center of attention in many public debates. Several questions regarding women's reproductive rights remain unanswered. How much control do women have over their bodies? What kind of rules can be morally imposed upon women? And who controls the bodies of women? Although the public continues to debate these topics, certain conclusions can been made concerning women and their reproductive rights. An undeniable fact is that government has a large degree of control over female reproductive organs. All around the world, time and time again, several national governments have implemented policies, enacted laws, and denied women control over their reproductive organs. Several governments have crossed the border between intimate and public matters concerning women's reproductive organs, by making laws about contraceptives, abortion, and family planning programs.
Therefore, legislation as deliberate law-making and the voice of the state of the sovereign body calls the common good of the life of man to the forefront of this question, both when democracy rules but primarily when totalitarian despots reign. The politicization of bare life as such legitimates the power of the sovereign state. But as repetitive instances of state-sponsored genocide have shown multiple times throughout the 20th century, state power can and does abuse the life of the citizen, whose life is paradoxically the force of the nation-state itself. It is through this e...
Document 1 shows the opinion of the Norwegian Prime Minister. His beliefs portray that, while religion and morality play a role in family-planning services, “morality becomes hypocrisy if it means accepting mothers’ suffering or dying in connection with unwanted pregnancies and illegal abortions, and unwanted children living in mistery.” He feels that women should be educated and that without this education population growth will become a more prominent issue. Document 5, a statement by the representative of the Syrian Arab Republic, also shows the belief that abortion should be a choice. Ultimately, it states that the enhancement of prosperity in societies, through family planning, is still in accordance with ethical and religious ideals. Document 6, a full U.N. Report, also shows the idea of abortion as a choice. It states that, “the aim of family-planning programmes must be to enable couples and individuals to decide freely and responsibly the number and spacing of their children and to have the information and means to do so.” Despite the fact that this family planning has led to a decrease in fertility rates, these services are still allowed, and barriers are even
At the U.S. Science Convention of 2011, the dire prediction was made that by 2050, we will have an “unrecognizable” planet by virtue of a huge population competing for a deficient number of resources. It is envisioned that the global population will climb to nine billion by 2050. Due to the increasing population, “we will need to produce as much food in the next 40 years as we have in the last 8,000,” said Jason Clay at the yearly meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). The only effective solution is to “minimize population growth…through more effective family planning”. We are now witnessing the truth that lied behind the theory of the economist, Thomas Malthus, who foreshadowed the increase of population with minimal resources to support it.
Many researchers and writers have differing views on whether population reduction is necessary, Ozzie Zehner, author of “The Environmental Politics of Population and Overpopulation,” makes valid arguments using his own research into the field. Zehner states that the nonprofit Optimum Population Trust advocates for the reduction of human population to one and two billion people, allowing each inhabitant to live at a high standard of living. Although this claim seems drastic at first, Zehner defends why we need this extreme reduction through research into the effects of a growing population. He claims that our population is like a Ponzi scheme, whereby an increase in the number of children each generation is required to support the older generation, also most growth comes from developing countries. This is an interesting point that he makes because it appears true on the surface, and Ponzi schemes have negative connotations attached to them. Zehner believes that because of this a reduction in our population will not be so simple. He states that even if the global birth rate were to decrease from the current average of 2.6 children per couple to 2.1 children pe...
The population of the world is nearing eight billion people. The population is taking over the world, and the food is diminishing. The population is growing too large for the planet to sustain. There must be rules about the growth of the population if the human race is to survive and grow together. If the race that is humanity wishes to survive, population control must be in effect.
Population control comes in many forms: cancer, famine, A.I.D.S, genocide, war and natural disasters, but never has one been so celebrated and socially accepted before abortion. Abortion has been practiced for hundreds of years and medical technology has advanced accordingly; providing a safer and much more sanitary procedure for the women receiving the operation, but the result remains the same for the defenseless child. Abortion continues to be one of the most debated and country dividing topics this nation has seen. In the recent past, there has been steady movement towards the governmental restrictions of abortion. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 was one of the greatest victories in congress related to this topic. The ban restricts a certain form of abortion (partial-birth abortion) past 24 weeks from conception (United States Congress). Even though this is a positive step in the right and moral direction, the act needs to be revised. It needs to have the allotted time reduced from 24 weeks to 20 weeks based upon new medical research that fetuses can “feel pain” prior to 24 weeks. Abortion will never become completely illegal (that is just harsh reality), but the restrictions that govern abortions can be fine tuned to incorporate a smaller and more humane window for abortions.
Rising global population is hindering our ability to become sustainable, especially in poorer and developing nations. Empowering women through educational opportunities and family planning programs have been shown to decrease population in developed nations through demographic transition. Even though fertility rates are declining in developed nations, there has been a significant increase in resource consumption, and the consumption of material goods and services (Withgott & Brennan, 2011, Chapter 8). Although population control can be a touchy subject, it should be addressed as a solution to our overconsumption and need for sustainability.
The human population growth rate is an alarming issue that brings with it irreversible consequences, that will likely effect the way of life for future generations to come. With the serious incline in population statistics comes catastrophic processes such as global warming and deforestation that have major ‘knock on’ ramifications. It’s issues such as these that need to be considered when we think about the growth of the human population, and we must take into account why these issues are occurring. We must also explore the options available to us that may assist in limiting the problems, or eliminating them all together, to provide a better place, not only for us in existence now, but also those who will walk this earth in the future decades and centuries to come.
Women’s reproductive rights are a global issue in today’s world. Women have to fight to have the right to regulate their own bodies and reproductive choices, although in some countries their voices are ignored. Abortion, sterilization, contraceptives, and family planning services all encompass this global issue of women’s reproductive rights.
Human population growth was relatively slow for most of human history. Within the past 500 years, however, the advances made in the industrial, transportation, economic, medical, and agricultural revolutions have helped foster an exponential, "J-shaped" rise in human population (Southwick, Figure 15.1, p. 160). The statistics associated with this type of growth are particularly striking: "Human beings took more than 3 million years to reach a population of 1 billion people...The second billion came in only 130 years, the third billion in 30 years, the fourth billion in 15 years, the fifth billion in 12 years..." (Southwick, p. 159). As human population has grown, there has been simultaneous growth within the industrial sector. Both of these increases have greatly contributed to environmental problems, such as natural resource depletion, ecosystem destruction, and global climate change. Also linked with the increasing human population are many social problems, such as poverty and disease. These issues need to be addressed by policy makers in the near future in order to ensure the survival and sustainability of human life.
Nowadays a prime example of one such policy is the past one child policy in China. Overpopulation has been an issue in China and the Chinese government has executed their own solution on this issue. The usefulness of the one child policy has been debated but data shows that it has in fact decreased the population during the time it was active. Birth control policies might be a viable solution to the current crisis of overpopulation but many argue that it would be unethical. The situation of China’s overpopulation can be very different from the US situation as well. The American people have much more control with their own personal liberty laws and many argued that a policy that restricts the amount of children our families can have would violate our human right to reproduce. However, birth control policies are not the only
This is very dangerous to not only us humans, but the planet. Even though many wealthy countries are not affected by this overpopulation, I feel like they should help the cause. There are always two sides to an issue like this. Some people don’t think that overpopulation is a big problem, and the ones who say it is an issue that needs to be dealt with. Impoverished countries are suffering because of overpopulation.
One of the most complex issues in the world today concerns human population. The number of people living off the earth’s resources and stressing its ecosystem has doubled in just forty years. In 1960 there were 3 billion of us; today there are 6 billion. We have no idea what maximum number of people the earth will support. Therefore, the very first question that comes into people’s mind is that are there enough food for all of us in the future? There is no answer for that. Food shortage has become a serious problem among many countries around the world. There are many different reasons why people are starving all over the world. The lack of economic justice and water shortages are just merely two examples out of them all.
Humans have become a threat to our own way of life by consuming more resources than needed, blind to the consequences that we may face in the future. As of 2016 the world population is at 7.4 billion and it is estimated to be at 11.2 billion by the year 2100. However 10 billion is the maximum population that can be sustained in terms of food security, only one of the many factors to global sustainability. Due to the fact that human consumption exceeds the amount of resources available, the United Nations “recognizes that eradicating poverty is the greatest global challenge” in A/RES/70/1. Sustainable development is not only required to fulfill the necessities of the present but to guarantee the capability for future generations to satisfy theirs.