Political Violence in the World

1135 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Effects of war on humanity

Political violence has been around for centuries in many different forms. Even back in ancient times and in the times of Christ have many cases of political violence even though in those times government was only recognized through a leadership of the throne for a kingdom. Wars and great battles have taken place only because of the conflicts over land or to protect their own kingdom of invasions. Now political violence in the 20th century is not so different from the ones in the past. Even though now days it takes a lot more to engage in wars as to back then, but overall the same concept. These days terrorist attacks, massacres, war threats, and war itself are the main examples of violence which are the most common ones to happen. Even though violence is not something states should encourage to do, sometimes it is the only necessary action to do when a state has no other option to take.

There are many roles for violence in the political system, and some of those roles can fall into the category of either protection or establishment, such examples for protection can be war threats. Threats as these fall under this definition, “Political violence then is the use of physical force in order to damage a political adversary” (Porta 2). When a country that has an enemy, has continuous war threats, and terrorist attacks will most likely only go into a war in the means of protecting their country and its innocent citizens. There have been cases like these in the past and are currently some today in some countries in Asia and the middle-east such as Iraq where they have to fight to protect their selves from invasions and possibly death. Iraq and the United States had started a war in 2003 and continued it for nine long years. ...

... middle of paper ...

...If it affects the citizens of a country in a terrible way that they need help to survive or children need to eat then of course people can come together and try to turn things around for them and try to make a difference in their lives. But if it is change that those people seek then only the help of the citizens of that country can make a change not anyone else. All the people have to be on the same page and want true peace if they want to have a nonviolent country otherwise it is going to remain the same.

Works Cited

Source 1:

Gupta, Dipak K. Understanding Terrorism and Political Violence: The Life Cycle of Birth, Growth, Transformation, and Demise. London: Routledge, 2008. Google Books. Web. 12 May 2014.

Source 2:

Porta, Donatella Della. Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. Google Books. Web. 12 May 2014.

Show More
Related

  • Non-State Political Violence: Occurrence and Justifications

    1814 Words  | 4 Pages

    Political violence is action taken to achieve political goals that may include armed revolution, civil strife, terrorism, war or other such activities that could result in injury, loss of property or loss of life. Political violence often occurs as a result of groups or individuals believing that the current political systems or anti-democratic leadership, often being dictatorial in nature, will not respond to their political ambitions or demands, nor accept their political objectives or recognize their grievances. Formally organized groups, Non-Government Organizations (NGOs), businesses and collectives of individual citizens are non-state actors, that being that they are not locally, nationally or internationally recognized legitimate civilian or military authorities. The Cotonou Agreement of 2000 defines non-state actors as being those parties belonging to the private sector, economic and social partners and civil society in all its forms according to national characteristics. Historical observation shows that nation states with political institutions that are not capable of, or that are resistant to recognizing and addressing societies issues and grievances are more likely to see political violence manifest as a result of disparity amongst the population. This essay will examine why non-state political violence occurs including root and trigger causes by looking at the motivations that inspire groups and individuals to resort to non-conforming behaviors that manifest as occurrences of non-state political violence. Using terrorism and Islamic militancy on the one side, and human rights and basic freedoms on the other as examples, it will look at these two primary kinds of political violence that are most prevalent in the world ...

    Read More

  • Violence as a Catalyst for Change: A Study on 'The Outsiders'

    815 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton proves the point that violence can be justified if necessary. To inflict change in their lives people often fight with violence instead of peace to evoke change. The world strives for change everyday whether or not you like it. How the people create a change in society whether they use peace or war, it is up to them to decide how to modify our ever changing world. Violence and fight between the Socs and Greasers tells us that both can be justified if it inflicts positive change in society. ‘

    Read More

  • The Effects of the Attacks on the Twin Towers in September 2001

    1452 Words  | 3 Pages

    Wieviorka, M (2009) Chapter 1, “violence and conflict” Violence: a New Approach. Pp 9-26. SAGE: London

    Read More

  • Psychology of Terrorist Group Recruitment

    2060 Words  | 5 Pages

    Miller, M. A. (2013). The foundations of modern terrorism: state, society and the dynamics of

    Read More

  • Why States Go to War

    1695 Words  | 4 Pages

    Conflicts exist because two states or countries feel threatened by another state. Before providing an explanation of the different views, lets grasp a better understanding of the word "state". Often states are interchanged with the word nation. Nation can have two meanings, that as a community with its own territory and government, and those people who share common characteristics, such as a common language, a common custom, and a common tradition. "It was believed that each nation should have its own state, each state should comprise one and only one nation." (Ziegler, 107) But many states today do not resemble the ideal nation-state, for they contain many nationalities. But still this does not define the word "state".

    Read More

  • Violence and Politics

    978 Words  | 2 Pages

    Let's talk about absolutely ridiculous pronouncements people make that either ignore simple fact or border on insanity. How about this one: Violence is no way to settle anything! Evidence suggests that violence is a very effective way of settling things. How about a few examples? In 1776, violence settled whether the thirteen colonies would be independent or remain under King George's thumb. In 1865, violence settled whether there'd be a Confederacy and a Union or just a Union. Between 1941 and 1945, violence settled whether Japan would control the Far East and whether Germany would control Europe. Violence settled whether American Indians owned and controlled the land now call United States or whether it would be European settlers and their progeny. In fact, violence has settled the question of land use-rights virtually everywhere.

    Read More

  • How Is Violence In The Media Perceived In Society

    1233 Words  | 3 Pages

    The world today has a variety of problems and violence is one of the most

    Read More

  • Does Nonviolence Work on a Large Scale?

    1807 Words  | 4 Pages

    Chenoweth seeks to explain why “nonviolent resistance often succeeds compared to violent resistance, and under what conditions nonviolence succeeds or fails”. In recent years, organized groups conducting civil disobedience have been successful using nonviolent tactics such as, “boycotts, strikes, protests, and organized noncooperation”, in order to challenge the current power they were facing.1 Some successful examples of regimes that have been removed from power in recent years are, “Serbia (2000), Madagascar (2002), Georgia (2003), Ukraine (2004-2005), Lebanon (2005), and Nepal (2006)”.1 More recently in 2011 there were major uprising in both Egypt and Tunisia that were able to remove regimes that had been in power for decades, showing that nonviolence can work even if the regime has been in power for years.1

    Read More

  • Non-Violence: The Most Successful Movements

    1092 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the history of the world, there have been many fights, movements, and wars. The thing about these, though, is not all can be successful. Now, we can look back in history to all of these disputes and find that the most successful movements are missing one thing- violence. This has been shown through leaders such as Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr, and Mahatma Gandhi. Even though these great leaders live in vastly different locations, that one missing tactic helped each achieve their own goals. Non-violence as a tactic has historically been successful, but a few things are required in order to make it work. Complete submission, unity (through the leaders), and respect for their enemies are just a few things that helped them achieve their goals.

    Read More

  • What Is Refugee Priority Levels?

    732 Words  | 2 Pages

    Political conflict refers to the prosecution of a political system that harms a certain group of people. When a political entity takes power in a country and begins to exile or kill the people who harbor a different political perspective, this creates a political conflict and usually refers to a dictatorship or Fascism. For example, during World War II, the former government officials went into exile and moved to allied countries as refugees under threat of the Nazis. Refugees like these are most often found in countries which carry on oligarchy and dictatorship like North Korea and several other countries that have been

    Read More

  • The Increase in Violence

    784 Words  | 2 Pages

    the change for a peaceful future. In today's society violence is saturating the minds of

    Read More

  • Causes of War: Systemic vs. Domestic

    1789 Words  | 4 Pages

    The purpose of this essay is to inform on the similarities and differences between systemic and domestic causes of war. According to World Politics by Jeffry Frieden, David Lake, and Kenneth Schultz, systemic causes deal with states that are unitary actors and their interactions with one another. It can deal with a state’s position within international organizations and also their relationships with other states. In contract, domestic causes of war pertain specifically to what goes on internally and factors within a state that may lead to war. Wars that occur between two or more states due to systemic and domestic causes are referred to as interstate wars.

    Read More

  • Ethics in War Are Necessary

    815 Words  | 2 Pages

    War has always been, and will always be, a necessary action perpetrated by man. There are many reasons for war: rage, passion, greed, defense, and religion to name a few. When differences cannot be solved or compromised through mediation with an opposing party, war is the last remaining option. Muslim historian Ibn Khaldun wrote in fourteenth-century Spain, that “War is a universal and inevitable aspect of life, ordained by God to the same extent as the sky and the earth, the heat and the cold. The question of whether to fright is not a significant moral question because fighting is constant; the minor decision not to fight this war will be made only in the context of knowing that another war will present itself soon enough because it is simply always there.” (Peter S. Themes. The Just War)

    Read More

  • Gandhi: Different varieties of Pacifism

    1348 Words  | 3 Pages

    personal violence is always wrong but political violence is sometimes right, and those who justify

    Read More

  • Political Violence

    2055 Words  | 5 Pages

    Political violence is the leading cause of wars today. Personal agendas have led to many of the political objectives that cause violence today this has caused many problems throughout the world and will continue to do so until a solution to this issue is found. Political objectives have been advanced involuntarily dependent upon the kind of government a nation exercises. For instance, in a democratic nation political groups must worry about convincing the majority in order to advance ethically. Those who try to influence the majority through acts of violence are considered today as “terror” organizations. Though perhaps if it were not because of the recent 9/11 terror attacks that maybe such warrants would not be seen as terror attacks, but instead the result of partisan advancement. Acts of terrorism have been around throughout the evolution of mankind. Terror attacks have even been traced back as far as the religious roots of an ancient middle east (Ross, Will Terrorism End?, 2006). However as man evolved, so did terrorism. Today’s extremism involves some of the main characteristics of ancient terrorism, but much more developed. Political advancement is no longer the root cause of terrorism acts. Instead influxes of “holy” wars have been appended the prior definition of terrorism. Mistakably modern terrorism has been confused for Political violence with political objectives, but research will establish that the nature of terrorism is fundamentally different from other forms of political violence.

    Read More

More about Political Violence in the World

Open Document