Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
power of the state essays
The disadvantages of compulsory education in the United States
the dangers of compulsory education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: power of the state essays
Political obligation is the obligation to obey the law because it is the law. Authority rather than argument is the reason of obedience. However, having a political obligation does not necessarily mean that one has to obey the law always, even when it .
The difference between "being obliged" to obey the law and "being under an obligation" to obey the law.
While the first one means that due to a threat upon you to act however the diktat wants you to or else you will be punished for disobedience. Like a bully who threatens the weak student to act as per his wishes.
Being Under an Obligation, on the other hand, implies that there is a universal moral order of right and wrong that everyone agrees with and everyone should commit to it. This
…show more content…
In Syria People were forced to risk their lives and leave everything dear to them behind and take a small boat. The harsh conditions they lived in made any suffering they might go through more bearable than the hell they ran away from. No one should be forced to leave their home land for any reason. No one should be forced to watch their kids get swallowed by the waves of the sea. Harry Beran ( 1987), accepts the claim that only express consent can generate a political obligation, That is, states should require their members openly to undertake an obligation to obey the law or to refuse to do so. Those who decline the obligation will then have the options of leaving the state, seceding to form a new state with like-minded people, or taking residence in a territory within the state reserved for dissenters. When I watch the news about Syria I can not help but wonder: “Who gave the Syrian -so called- president the right to murder thousands of people and force them to leave their homes into the unknown just because the are not willing to “Obey” him and accept his policy? Because of that question Syrian people got divided into two teams. One that thinks that the “decent, safe life” that the president has provided has made every person in Syria in a dept to him. Therefor, obeying the rules is the simplest thing they can do to return the favour. Which is really similar to Socrates reasoning with gratitude being one of the considerations he relies on in justifying why he will not disobey the jury that sentenced him to death. I find that ridiculous because if we were to presume that the there are things we have to consider first. For example, the free schools the government provided for the people was more of a forced favour, because even those who do not want to go to school are obliged to go to school and study because of the
Duty may be performed without strain or reflection of desire, which means your duty, or responsibility, should be performed without hesitation. “Dutifulness could be an account of a morality with no hint of religion” (Murdoch 364). Religion’s demand for morality and being good trumps a person’s decision to
We as a society have acted upon our obligations in the past, such as during World War 2, yet the occasional dose of action is not what we are supposed to desire as humans. We can not say “I will help these people who are being abused today, yet these people yesterday are on their own.”. Moral obligation is not something so fickle as we wish to make it seem. Although the proposal I have left you with is tough to chew on, it is the right principle to act upon if we are to improve human life and live morally good lives.
Politics could not exist without the concept of morality. As Walzer states, “moral life is a social phenomenon, and it is constituted at least in part by rules, the knowing of which (and perhaps the making of which) we share with our fellows” (Dirty Hands, page 170). The same definition could be used to define a law, and one could argue that a law is just a political moral. Political life is also a social phenomenon, constituted by rules, which are acknowledged and created by our peers. Laws are political extensions of our morals, the commonly agreed upon virtues by which we live our lives. As the human race, we have universally agreed upon morals we expected to abide by. As a politician is an extension, not an exception from, the state, the
of the theory even say that it is one's moral duty to act on these
Consent is defined as “an act of permitting something to be done or of recognizing some authority” (Britannica, n.d.). Almost all political theorists share this definition of consent, however the boundaries surrounding this definition leave us asking many questions: how do we consent, to whom do we consent and when do we consent? Most importantly, did we consent at all? When we go back to the fundamentals of defining how, when, and if we gave consent, it is to be derived that we never consented. The following will define the boundaries of consent, give a summary of the various philosophical arguments given for political obligation, and disseminate these arguments.
...to lie on occasion as result of better results or to not harm the other person. For example, if a teenager does not tell his parents he snuck out and drove their car then he avoids punishment if he simply says he never went out. Also, if a girl does not like the dress her friend is wearing but still says she does, then she lies for the benefit of her friend rather than causing harm. Although people still lie, they are still able to act morally in accordance with universal law. Overall, I believe it depends on the circumstances and individual on whether or not humans are obligated to act morally because morality is for the sake of the individual while obligation would be for the sake of others or the community. As a result, rather than a moral “obligation” to act, it should be replaced by desire so that people would want to act a certain way instead of feeling forced.
The Syrian Civil War is a good example of world leaders playing by the rules of realism. The civil war began in March of 2011 as part of the Arab Spring, and by July of 2012 17,000 have died and another 170,000 fled the country (Almond). The United Nations Security Council in February of 2012 had tried t...
Since March 2011, Syria had no longer experienced a situation called peace and harmony. Syrian’s daily life is filled with the events of killing, bombing and torturing of their brothers and sisters. This unresolved conflict began with a revolution to against the government for brook the promise to have betterment in political system (citation). However the government had responded by harsh action. Starting from this point, Syria had slide into Civil War. Based on the brief description about situation in Syria, I strongly believe that the best International Relation theory to describe this situation is constructivism. This is because the Civil War in Syria is socially constructed by some factors which will be discussed deeply in the next paragraph. In this essay, I will emphasize on the two factors that lead to Syria Civil War which are identity conflict in a state and the absence of shared norms of sovereignty; and provide a solution from constructivism perspective which is diplomacy negotiation and limitation to it.
"Social obligation is a moral structure which recommends that an element, be it an affiliation or separate, has an obligation to represent the benefit of society for substantial".
Is it more important for you to follow the letter of the law or to follow the spirit of the law? In my opinion, following the letter of the law would be the most important due to the fact it means rule of law, which indicate that no person, government entity or official is above the law. In other words, you cannot make up laws based on your interpretation of the law and what you feel is right or wrong. For example, if you were riding public transportation such as a bus and a police officer entered the bus and told you to get off the bus for no apparent reason, this would be unlawful. This where the rule of law plays a vital rule and protecting your rights as a citizen in the United States.
... whether it is just or unjust, it does not mean that we have no respect to laws. When disobeying laws, one must have higher purpose respecting the will of the mass. Gandhi and King both pointed out that they never advocated breaking laws on the sly for personal convenience, they attacked unjust laws at their own risk in order to improve the society. Accordingly, while admitting that it is reasonable and necessary to disobey unjust laws undermines the interests of the pubic, we should also recognize the value of laws, deeply respect it and behave strictly as the just laws. Otherwise, a society without the limitation of laws would undoubted come into disorder and chaos.
obligation is to protect the innocent as well as to convict the guilty, to guard
With the disturbance on the issue of ‘Political Dynasty,’ there are wide ranges of philosophies and theories that can be intertwined with the said study. This study on political dynasty is said to be in connection with the standpoint of Social Contract of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke based on man’s fundamental struggle for survival. “All people are born free.” The state of nature is the state of perfect freedom and equality. The world was never without political or social structure. Political and social structure arises naturally with humankind. On the view of Hobbes and Locke, the moral justification for the action of the state is utilitarian, the moral theory that states, “The greatest happiness of the greatest number” as formulated by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. In addition, the Social Contract of Jean Jacques Rousseau which was greatly inspired by the French Revolution states that individual should give up his personal and should accept the ‘general will’ in order to discover one’s higher aspiration and moral freedom (Bautista, 2013). “Man is born free, and he is everywhere in chains.” He believes that society is base upon some implicit contract, and that contract implies that the ruler is people’s agent, not their master. This implies that the general welfare of the people is dependent on the State, on how he will carry his people. Also, he said that this contract offers guarantees.
Law is one of the most important elements that transform humans from mere beasts into intelligent and special beings. Law tells us what is right and wrong and how we, humans, should act to achieve a peaceful society while enjoying individual freedoms. The key to a successful nation is a firm, strong, and fair code of high laws that provides equal and just freedom to all citizens of the country. A strong government is as important as a firm code of law as a government is a backbone of a country and of the laws. A government is a system that executes and determines its laws. As much as fair laws are important, a capable government that will not go corrupt and provide fair services holds a vital role in building and maintaining a strong country.