According to this definition, whether it be arresting someone with too much force or even uttering certain statements, can all be classified as police brutality. No individual should be victimized by police officers who use excess force that in no way deters crimes. It does nothing but bring a dire unjust society in which innocent people can feel afraid; and give those officers who are correctly doing their duties a bad reputation. Due to the dispensable, unscrupulous nature of police brutality; several measures including disciplining police officers, stricter laws(and stringent penalties), integration, as well as educating the general public about their rights, must be applied in order to extirpate the misconduct citizens should not have to face. Firstly, even after government advancement, the integration of a democratic society, and a greatly improved justice system, individuals still feel threatened by police officers.
I would have to say that reducing community violence would be a major issue, because the lack of community policing. Community policing, from the beginning of time has always been the tradition. However, it’s declined. According to Alfred, community policing without a clear focus on crime risk factors generally shows no effect on crime. As, I stated previously, there is a shortage with police officers, this effect, the police agencies ability to hire more police officers to reduce crime in the community.
3.4 Combating the human rights violation in police custody 1. Necessary for eliminate corruption in police system: the majority of police officer are corrupted and reason behind is chain of corruption, officer to minister, most of the police officer have to give money to their superior officer and according which he/she get the posting and charge of police station, superior officer only prefer those officer who earn for them rather than their capabilities. This pattern ought to be stayed away from at any cost. Unrivalled police ought to be prepared to carry on splendidly keeping away from a wide range of feedback. At that point no one but they can continuously keep their hands clean and convey the subordinates to their way.
They’re citizens no matter what, and as a police officer, their basic job is to protect them, no matter what. Whenever an officer is not held responsible, it leads to a whole lot of confusion and chaos. The only way that it will fully work is if the officers are held in from of a grand jury of 12, not the same department that they work for. No more favoritism. It won’t change everything, but it’s a start to something that’ll hopefully change what we know now into something much
Consider for once how lucky one is for not having the physical appearance of a criminal, and even tough such thing does not exist, America 's Police Department seem to have a pretty good idea of what a criminal should look like. As Benjamin Spock once said: "Most middle-class whites have no idea what it feels like to be subjected to police who are routinely suspicious, rude, belligerent, and brutal.” Thus, unfortunately, being victim of police 's power abuse is a reality that many people have been suffering from in the past years. The abuse of power by police officers is a known fact, and the government should address it by improving the selection processes of new officers, increasing monitorship, and implementing punishments. Police officers abuse the authority given to them in many ways. First, physically, by brutally beating up individuals that they identify as "suspects."
Rioting can't be prevented by making force more brutal--only by regulating it more capably. The only way to prevent riots is to make sure that police know when force is or is not warranted, and to increase the severity in punishment of police officers who are unnecessarily rough. Increasing violence on the part of officers of the law does not and will not prevent rioting, nor will it cut the incidence of violent crime by any significant factor. Contrarily, it will only give people more reason to feel as if their concerns are not being appreciated. If black men everywhere are assaulted as if their presence were some sort of security threat, then how could it be thought that there would be less incidence of riots?
This is not the case at all. They are protecting the community and chasing serious felons. That is why most cops defend their right to engage in these high-risk pursuits. No police officer wants to try to stop somebody that they believe is good for a crime just to let him walk away. If the person that is being chased is wanted for a crime, not that he is guilty, but just wanted for an investigation, then the police have every right to stop them and to do what is necessary to apprehend them.
Officers need to be treated like citizens when it comes to that type of crime. They should be sent to jail and just saying sorry should not let them off the hook. They may be law officers, but they are not gods and they should have to face the consequences of their actions as all good citizens must. Sources Cited Dority, Barbara. "Established: A Pattern of Abuse."
Eras of American Policing and Their Origin American policing originated from early English law and is profoundly influenced by its history. Early law enforcement in England took on two forms of policing, one of which heavily influenced modern policing and it is known as the watch (Potter, 2013). The watch consisted, at first, of volunteers which had to patrol the streets for any kind of disorder including crime and fire. After men attempted to get out of volunteering by paying others, it became a paid professional position (Walker & Katz, 2012). The three eras of policing in America are shaped by these early ideas and practices of law enforcement.
Virginian colonists had the right, granted to them by The Virginia Company, to elect a colonial legislature, called the House of Burgesses. Since Virginia was the first royal colony, it was only fitting that they should lead the way with the first representative government in the New World. Other lawmaking bodies, not that dissim... ... middle of paper ... ...ctions eventually lead to the committee system still used by all governmental organizations. Paragraph nine of the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut (1639), known as the first written constitution in North America, makes reference to town meetings. The towns of Windsor, Hartford, and Wethersfiled adopted the Fundamental Orders on January 14, 1639.