Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effective management and leadership in healthcare
Personal change essay
Effective leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Georgia Power Company’s Plant Hammond had a old-school mindset about leadership. Their idea of leadership consisted of making key decisions with only the top management involved. They felt like they were good company and had the whole idea of leadership and management figured out. One or two personnel decided every important decision and not much thought was given on how it affected the other departments. According to Evans while the business had a decent rate of return and operated somewhat smoothly, in the early 1990s a watershed development occurred which moved the company towards deregulation (Evans 2011, p. 340). The company had to rethink its managerial style as well as how the company needed to operate. The company used various practices and techniques to reevaluate its management practices as well as its operation procedures. According to Evans (2011), “In the summer of 1995 the plant manager and nine other employees took their first step towards becoming a team when they came together at a facilitated offsite meeting” (p. 341). According to Evans during this time the company established new roles and responsibilities (Evans 2011, p. 341). This caused a new thinking process within the management. With this new mindset, each …show more content…
It went from a company where decisions were made without thoroughly understanding how it was affecting the company. The personnel involved with the decision-making did not consider the big picture of how the decisions would impact workers or other departments and never consulted the departments or workers on what they thought was best. This mindset changed and with the change brought a whole new way of management that supported the company by understanding how different decisions affected the entire company. The company also found a way to support its managers by using outside sources to help figure out what the individuals’ strengths and weaknesses
General Motors became a “centralized organization, so decision-making authority is concentrated in the hands of top-level managers, and little authority is delegated to lower levels” (Ferrell et al., 2015, p. 199). Centralized organizations have little upward communication and top-level manager may not be aware of problems and unethical activities. According to Ferrell et al., (2015), it has been noted that “centralized organization may exert influence on their employees because they have a central core of policies and codes of ethical conduct” (p. 201). Conversely, to survive at GM employees praised the CEO intelligence and carried out their orders by keeping a low profile, and never made waves. GM rewarded employees who followed the old traditional ways and those that challenged their thinking lost promotion opportunities or their jobs. However, General Motors experienced conflict between corporate management responsibility and social responsibility. Consequently, General Motors “attempted to implement a new mentality upon its management in a short period of time” (Goussak, Webber, & Ser, 2012, p. 49) by changing the company’s environment, but
Because the production level of the mill was low when the new plant manager arrived, it is no surprise that a quick change in the type of management—to autocratic—quickly pushed all employees to raise production. However, it is likely that the style of leadership has taken its toll on every level of management in the mill, and that is why we’ve seen a drop in production in the last 18 months. Autocratic leadership is a rigid form of management and if any tasks are delegated, they are done so in a very specific way. But, generally, autocratic leaders are not known to delegate tasks effectively and high levels of management are usually the only people with any sort of authority. Empowerment, as discussed in the
If Beverly knew about this management styles before heading into the job at Gridlock Meadows she might have been more prepared for what was about to come. This paper might have come off a little bias but remember that each management style has its positive aspects as well as negative ones. The key is recognizing the management style and how to work with each one you may encounter.
“The team is faced with creating cohesion and unity, differentiating roles, identifying expectations for members, and enhancing commitment. Providing supportive feedback and fostering commitment to a vision are needed from the team leaders (Developing Management Skills).” ... ... middle of paper ... ...
Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (June 2010). Managing organizational change: A philosophies of change approach. Journal of Change Management 10(2), 135–154.
Leaders benefit from building a team to create and implement change, this is a key theme in the Kotter model of change. This teambuilding engages employees throughout the process. Allowing employees to be a part of the change process gives them the opportunity and trust to be creative moving toward the future (Cochrane, 2002). Leaders can create opportunity for employees and leaders to dialogue about the change, which can help troubleshoot the process. Leaders who engage employees throughout the organization from various levels of the organization will receive perspectives from the entire organization helping them make better-informed decisions. Employees want to be allowed the opportunity to help an organization they believe in, in a way that enhances the
The experienced change was as a reaction to the external environment and influenced organizational strategy, the company’s leadership, and culture. This large-scale change led to a new state of being (thinking and acting).
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Second, team members must appreciate one another’s perspectives and refrain from blaming one another for problems they may encounter. Before Jimenez’s team-based productivity project, the engineers and the operations workers at the Wichita site neither understood nor appreciated the other side’s contributions. Jimenez and Keller set up the monthly meetings to discuss problems and resolve them. That was an excellent mechanism for providing information on the different contributions and challenges of the various camps. Moreover, their active intervention during those meetings helped stop the blaming. Finally team members must create shared views of problems and shared approaches for resolving them. Those commonalities must be acceptable to everyone if they are to provide the core for new ways of doing things. The monthly problem chats represented the beginning of process if developing acceptable approaches. The company softball games provided a powerful way for the brains and the brawn to develop a shared picture if their plant and its goals, as well as to get to know individuals from the other side and to appreciate their perspectives.
Organizational change is a very big risk for organizations. The process of change can be very difficult for employees as well as the leaders implementing the changes. The changes are usually planned to improve the company. However, sometimes change can destroy a company when things don’t go as planned. From a change in management to a change in the company structure, or way of doing daily task, organizations must carefully execute the process of change and use change strategies that will ensure success.
Stewart, G., Manz, C., & Sims, H., (1999). Teamwork and Group Dynamics. New York: Wiley. pp. 70- 125.
Kotter, J. P. (2007). ‘Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail’. Harvard Business Review, January: 96-103.
I’ll begin by discussing Victor Kiam. Victor was well known for his phrase, “I liked the shaver so much, I bought the company.” The company he bought was Remington Products in 1979. He was an entrepreneur who was more interested in helping a company acquire its first million dollars instead of all the millions that it raised thereafter (www.growingbusiness.co.uk). When Victor purchased Remington; he cut away layers of unnecessary management to save the company money. I believe that is due to his autocratic leadership style. “Autocratic leaders make decisions on their own without consulting employees” (Boone, Kurtz, 2011, pg. 269). This leadership style was evident when he bought Remington.
One of the first scholars to describe the process of organizational change was Lewin (1974). He described change as a three-stage process that consists of unfreezing, moving and freezing stage. During the unfreezing stage the organizations become motivated to change by some event or objective. The moving stage is like implementation when the organization actually makes the necessary change. Furthermore the freezing stage is reached when the change becomes permanent. Organizational change has also...
...ged change and drove stability. They also managed risk with their wave implementation plan and other measures. The company had performed their due diligence and had earned their rights to success.