Picot Evidence Synthesis Paper

578 Words2 Pages

PICOT Evidence Synthesis Paper Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide a synthesis of the literature evidence related to our clinical problem. Our diagnosis PICOT question is as follows, “In teenage athletes with a suspected concussion (P) is a neurological exam (I) compared to imaging testing (C) more accurate in diagnosing a concussion (O) immediately after the injury (T)?” According to our research evidence, a concussion diagnosis should be based on a thorough neurological evaluation comprised of a cognitive and balance function assessment. Our evidence literature findings suggest that imaging testing as a primary diagnostic tool is inconclusive for accurately diagnosing a concussion in an adolescent athlete. Synthesis of Evidence …show more content…

In the McCrea et al. (2017) study, QUADAS-2 was the tool utilized to measure the accuracy of the diagnostic studies involved. This research involved 76 neuroimaging, 16 fluid biomarker and 6 genetic composition studies, all of which contained moderate to high level of bias due to low sample size, inadequate participant variation and lack of non-concussed participants to serve as the controlled group. Even though these studies yielded good information and have high potential for clinical use in the near future, they all had low to moderate level of confidence in strength. The reliability of this study is good because experts in the respective research fields analyzed the study results and assessed for content accuracy using the QUADAS-2 rating system. These diagnostic tools aren’t adequate for applicability into clinical practice. The concussion guideline in Mapstone (2016) is of good quality due to low risk bias. The study reliability is credible given that implemented concussion guide was drafted from multiple class III studies conducted by the American Academy of Neurology and it was revised from a prior guide published by the American Academy of Pediatrics. AAN determined that SCAT3 accurately diagnosed a concussion in an athlete with a sensitivity of 64-89% and a specificity of 91-100% and is the standard assessment tool for children younger or older

More about Picot Evidence Synthesis Paper

Open Document