One nation is being portrayed as being enveloped within a global system and, therefore, its politics and policies defy separate analysis.
Prior to the Second World War, extreme nationalism in the sense of Fascism ran rampart throughout the world. Japan saw massive influence that eventually lead to their commitment towards the Axis powers. Whilst in a different manner, China witnessed a smaller Nationalist Group (GMD) try to take hold of the government via means of being portrayed as a faux Communist group (CCP). Their attempts would ultimately fail, obviously leading to a strong communist government in China and fascism in Japan. One must consider what factors both countries have in common in their rightist movement via an analysis of their impact or lack thereof on each country.
Among the many countries that have been under Communist rule, the former Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China are two countries that are evidently similar and can be compared because of their everlasting impact on the history of Communism. Although these two countries show similarities within their communist rulings, they can also be contrasted. An important comparison is each Communist state’s rise to power, where each country suffered a lot of hardships to achieve communism. As well, both the Soviet Union and China have had very influential and extreme leaders, more specifically Joseph Stalin in the Soviet Union, and Mao Zedong in China. Another factor that is both very comparable is the political and social conditions, but show some dissimilarity as well. Lastly, within these two Communist states, there were two major ideologies, being Marxism-Leninism in the Soviet Union, and Maoism in China. The former Soviet Union and China are the most prominent countries under the Communist rule in history, and the similarities and differences between them are difficult to
Communism impacted the countries of Russia and China in both strikingly similar and different ways, for the better, or for the worse. During the time period of 1900 to 1945, communism in China and Russia were developed both differently and similarly by the audience to whom they appealed, the programs they sponsored, how they incorporated nationalism into those programs, how effectively they were resisted, and in how the Communist rules were structured. They both appealed to the peasantry, sponsored programs that would call for equal opportunity given to the people, and were resisted ineffectively but the Chinese altered their programs, due to the difference in politics, geographic location, and social problems. The audience in which they appealed to were similar, for they both appealed to the peasantry due to harsh times. They both rose to power due to the fact that the country wanted to end war but their opposing political party did not meet these needs. Nationalism was an important feature of both as China needed nationalism to fight the Japanese while Russia needed nationalism to pull out of the war. The programs they sponsored essentially were similar in many aspects although they did not match up perfectly because of the geological, social, and political differences of China. Communism affected both countries in a variety of different ways.
The first half of the twentieth century were the breeding years of Communism. The books Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini by Bruce F. Pauley and China in Transformation by Colin Mackerras both deal with the rise of Communism, the former in the Soviet Union and the latter in China. Although one book deals with the rise of Communism in the Soviet Union and the other book deals with the rise of Communism in China, both authors have similar abstract ideas about the elements necessary for a Communist takeover, such as the importance of “revolution, reform, change, and reaction”. (Mackerras, 2) One can see that what both these authors agree on, when looked at abstractly, is that for a “Communist victory” to occur, the course of events must happen in that sequence.
After millions of years under imperial rule in China, nationalist rebellions made the government unstable eventually making way for communist ideas. For over twenty years the nationalist struggled to keep democratic power in the country. The Xinhai revolution was a civil war between the nationalists and the communists. The Communists were led by Mao Zedong and they emerged victoriously. In September 1949, two good things happened. It was the celebration of the communist victory and the unveiling of the communist regime that would subsequently rule over China. Mao and his communist supporters had been fighting against a corrupt and abandoned Nationalist government in China. Mao denounced that those who opposed the communist government are imperialistic and domestic reactionaries. Mao also declared that communi...
Two Great Philosophers and their Principal Theories
Sigmund Schlomo Freud was an Austrian neurologist born on May 06, 1856. Freud is know as the father of psychoanalysis, his theories of the unconscious mind and repression. Freud created the clinical method of psychoanalysis to investigate and treat psychopathology. Freud understood the workings of the human brain. He was intrigued by it, I believe that was one of the reasons he was a neurologist.
Philosopher Robert Nozick believes in the entitlement theory. The entitlement theory states that, “A person who acquires a holding in accordance with the principle of justice in acquisition is entitled to that holding...A person who acquires a holding in accordance with the principle of justice in transfer, from someone else entitled to the holding, is entitled to the holding…No one is entitled to a holding except by (repeated) applications of 1 and 2” (NOTES).
Rationalism is the belief that reason is the primary source of all knowledge. Rationalists argue that humans have knowledge that cannot be gained by experiences alone.
Philosophy
“Man’s life is a line that nature commands him to describe upon the surface of the Earth without ever being able to swerve from it, even for an instant… His organization does in nowise depend upon himself, his ideas come to him involuntarily, his habits are in the power of those who cause him to contract them… He is good or bad, happy or miserable, wise or foolish, reasonable or irrational, without his will being for anything in these various states.” -D’Holbach