Philosophical Analysis Regarding The Existence of Deity

1101 Words3 Pages

Since the beginning of mankind religion has always been an issue at the forefront of almost every society and has long been a controversial topic. Since people started to truly think about philosophy there have also always been philosophers trying to prove or disprove God’s existence by using their own brand of argument. It is almost impossible to make a foolproof argument regardless of which side you choose, which is why almost every generation or time period has their own counter to the previous example. Although there are intelligent viewpoints on both sides of the idea that will be analyzed, I don’t believe that any one yet has proven with a completely intellectually sound argument that God exists as he has been described.
The last part about the exact parameters of God is exactly what makes this concept of God so hard to prove. The consensus definition for God is that regardless of religion, it is a personal being who is omnipotent, omniscient and omni-benevolent as well as being the creator of the universe. The first viewpoint on this idea is brought about by St. Thomas Aquinas who uses the Cosmological argument to prove his way. In general, this approach bases a lot of it’s standing on the fact that things exist and trying to see why they exist. It also includes the principle of sufficient reason which states that there must be an answer to general questions about why things exist and sometimes that anything at all is positive.
Aquinas starts his own validation of God ironically by bringing about two objections to his own notion. The first is that he says if it did exist as it is described to be, then there would be no evil and since there is clearly evil in the world, God doesn’t exist. The second objection he brings ab...

... middle of paper ...

...t as well. Hume offers that although it seems like there can’t be an infinite line of causes, if you look at the whole and realize that each connection is “like the uniting of several distinct counties into one whole kingdom.” This connection is simply an act of the mind and doesn’t then need an originator because it is a circular loop instead of a straight line.
The question for this was to decide whether or not we can prove that God exists and given the arguments brought about, I don’t believe that at this time anyone has definitively proven the existence of God. Now if you asked the opposite question of can we prove that god doesn’t exist I’m not sure you would get much further but that is not what is being asked here. As far as Aquinas and similar philosophers are concerned, no we can not prove that God exists based on the knowledge and limitations we have now.

Open Document