Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philosophy essay does god exist
Cosmological argument st thomas aquinas
Philosophy essay does god exist
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Philosophy essay does god exist
Since the beginning of mankind religion has always been an issue at the forefront of almost every society and has long been a controversial topic. Since people started to truly think about philosophy there have also always been philosophers trying to prove or disprove God’s existence by using their own brand of argument. It is almost impossible to make a foolproof argument regardless of which side you choose, which is why almost every generation or time period has their own counter to the previous example. Although there are intelligent viewpoints on both sides of the idea that will be analyzed, I don’t believe that any one yet has proven with a completely intellectually sound argument that God exists as he has been described.
The last part about the exact parameters of God is exactly what makes this concept of God so hard to prove. The consensus definition for God is that regardless of religion, it is a personal being who is omnipotent, omniscient and omni-benevolent as well as being the creator of the universe. The first viewpoint on this idea is brought about by St. Thomas Aquinas who uses the Cosmological argument to prove his way. In general, this approach bases a lot of it’s standing on the fact that things exist and trying to see why they exist. It also includes the principle of sufficient reason which states that there must be an answer to general questions about why things exist and sometimes that anything at all is positive.
Aquinas starts his own validation of God ironically by bringing about two objections to his own notion. The first is that he says if it did exist as it is described to be, then there would be no evil and since there is clearly evil in the world, God doesn’t exist. The second objection he brings ab...
... middle of paper ...
...t as well. Hume offers that although it seems like there can’t be an infinite line of causes, if you look at the whole and realize that each connection is “like the uniting of several distinct counties into one whole kingdom.” This connection is simply an act of the mind and doesn’t then need an originator because it is a circular loop instead of a straight line.
The question for this was to decide whether or not we can prove that God exists and given the arguments brought about, I don’t believe that at this time anyone has definitively proven the existence of God. Now if you asked the opposite question of can we prove that god doesn’t exist I’m not sure you would get much further but that is not what is being asked here. As far as Aquinas and similar philosophers are concerned, no we can not prove that God exists based on the knowledge and limitations we have now.
In this paper, I will explain how Descartes uses the existence of himself to prove the existence of God. The “idea of God is in my mind” is based on “I think, therefore I am”, so there is a question arises: “do I derive my existence? Why, from myself, or from my parents, or from whatever other things there are that are less perfect than God. For nothing more perfect than God, or even as perfect as God, can be thought or imagined.” (Descartes 32, 48) Descartes investigates his reasons to show that he, his parents and other causes cannot cause the existence of himself.
...nd since from what we know we can imagine things, the fact that we can imagine an infinite, transcendent, omnipresent, omniscient, omnipotent God is proof that He exists, since what can me thought of is real and can be known.” (ch. 2) Saint Thomas Aquinas' rebutting reply would be that it is simply not so, not everything can be known to mortal man and not all that is real is directly evident to us as mankind.
In the first part, Aquinas states that the existence of god is not self-evident, meaning that reason alone without appealing to faith can give a good set of reasons to believe. To support this claim, Aquinas refers to “The Argument of Motion”, proposing that:
St. Thomas Aquinas presents five arguments to demonstrate the existence of God. However, this paper focuses on the fifth argument. The fifth argument is regarded as the Teleological Argument and states that things that lack intelligence act for some end or purpose. While the fifth argument satisfies God’s existence for Aquinas, some contemporary readers would argue that Aquinas neglects the laws of physics. Others argue that Aquinas allows a loophole in his argument so that the Catholic conception of God is not the only intelligent designer.
He states that he can conceive the existence of a 'wonderful lost island', which is perfect, just by thinking about the idea. However Anselms counter objects to Gaunilo's argument by saying that only the idea of god can be thought of as necessarily existing because it is unique. Aquinas makes his views known, and I believe it would be beneficial to identify them because they are relevant to the question. Aquinas states the God's existence may indeed be self-evident, but it is not self-evident to us because we do not understand the essence of God. Furthermore we (man) may self-evidently desire happiness, and God may be man's happiness but we dont desire God through ignorance.
The Proof of the Existence of God There are many arguments that try to prove the existence of God. In this essay I will look at the ontological argument, the cosmological. argument, empirical arguments such as the avoidance of error and the argument from the design of the. There are many criticisms of each of these that would say the existence of God can’t be proven that are perhaps.
Having faith is believing in things that you don’t see. According to the Meditations, Descartes gets rid of beliefs that he isn’t certain of and keeps the ones that are undoubtable. He tries to prove that God has must exist since we have such a clear and distinct idea of him. I believe it is impossible to prove without a doubt that God exists.
Truth, what is truth? This question itself has a thousand answers, no person can ever be sure of what truth is rather, truth can be justified, it can checked for reliability with strong evidences and logic. If the evidence proves to be accurate then it can be established that a certain answer is the truth. However, have we ever tried to think about what intrigues us to seek the truth? To think about a question and set foot firmly on the path of knowledge. Definitely it has! That was the very cause itself which is why this world has witnessed some of the greatest philosophers like Aristotle, Plato and Socrates etc. along with the school of thought. The ability to think and reason is one of the greatest ability humans have, it is what distinguishes us from the animals. It is what gives us free will, the ability to control our own outcomes. However, it is that ability to ‘think’ itself which has caused men to rebel with the myths and statements established about the unseen and natural forces since the beginning of time. It gave rise to questions such as: Do aliens exist? Is there a world of the unseen? Life after Death and the most popular question since the beginning of times, Does God exists? And the answer is ‘yes’. Here is how I will justify my stance.
Instinctually, humans know that there is a greater power in the universe. However, there are a few who doubt such instinct, citing that logically we cannot prove such an existence. St. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica, wrote of five proofs for the existence of God. The Summa Theologica deals with pure concepts; these proofs rely on the world of experience - what one can see around themselves. In these proofs, God will logically be proven to exist through reason, despite the refutes against them.
The purpose of my essay will be to examine Descartes' argument for the existence of God. First, I will discuss Descartes’ proof for the existence of God then I will critique the argument of his existence. Lastly, I will point to some complications and problems that exist within the proof. Descartes’ proof of the existence of God is presented in the Third Meditation. He shapes his argument on the proof in the Second Meditation that in order for Descartes to think he must exist. From this specific examination he realizes his existence is very clear and distinct in his mind because of the fact he had just discovered his own existence. He then creates a rule that whatever things he sees are clear and distinct, are all true. Descartes begins his proof by splitting his thoughts into four categories, which consist of ideas, judgments, volitions, and emotions. He then further analyzes these categories to decide which thoughts might consist of error.
In the beginning, God created the world. He created the earth, air, stars, trees and mortal animals, heaven above, the angels, every spiritual being. God looked at these things and said that they were good. However, if all that God created was good, from where does un-good come? How did evil creep into the universal picture? In Book VII of his Confessions, St. Augustine reflects on the existence of evil and the theological problem it poses. For evil to exist, the Creator God must have granted it existence. This fundamentally contradicts the Christian confession that God is Good. Logically, this leads one to conclude evil does not exist in a created sense. Augustine arrives at the conclusion that evil itself is not a formal thing, but the result of corruption away from the Supreme Good. (Augustine, Confessions 7.12.1.) This shift in understanding offers a solution to the problem of evil, but is not fully defended within Augustine’s text. This essay will illustrate how Augustine’s solution might stand up to other arguments within the context of Christian theology.
Proving the existence of God is a worthwhile task. If someone did come up with a complete, foolproof argument for the existence of God, the people of the world would have no choice but to believe in His existence. However, even though St. Thomas Aquinas makes a worthy effort, I believe that such a task is not possible through logic and reasoning alone. There is an element of faith that must be present for people to believe, and if that element is not there, no matter how foolproof an argument seems to be, there will always be those who do not believe. In his fifth argument, St. Thomas Aquinas makes as close to foolproof argument that I believe anyone could make, and, for me, it does prove God's existence. However, if that element of faith is not there, I do not think you can completely prove God's existence to everyone.
... God and how He is related to us – how powerful He is to make everything in this world works; how He made everything almost perfect for us. I have also learned that believing He exist, makes me understand more about His existence, just like what St. Anselm said. I believe that believing He exists, is what makes Him exist. For me, Yes, God really exist.
...every facet of reality, since not all things can be known. Aquinas asserts from the beginning that philosophy merely serves theology, the queen of the sciences. To be completely certain of God's existence would require him to reveal himself directly. However, plenty of strong evidence is presented in Aquinas five ways, and by countless other thinkers as well. After understanding this, it is easy to detect Aquinas genius in his work on metaphysics. Aquinas revolutionized his field in countless ways, but in metaphysics, he changed how thinkers approached typical metaphysical problems permanently. Every metaphysical thinker after him would have to respond to his positions for centuries afterwards due to their strength. Today, though objections have been raised by now, Aquinas philosophy stands up to any modern equivalent full-able, and will hold its own in any contest.
From the discussion, it can be concluded that existence of God can be proved and developed by logical reasoning. They can be proved by seeking answers to our everyday questions like what can be bigger than our reason, who dictates solar system to act like an animate body. The evidence may not have physical existence but it is supported by the physical elements of nature.