Persuasive Essay On The Death Penalty
opinion Essay
1335 words
The death penalty fails to act as a deterrent to crime. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(1) Starting off, I am going to present to you a fact: the amount of people executed in the United States in twenty-fifteen (2015) alone was twenty seven (27). Let me give you another statistic, the U.S. was found to have the 5th highest amount of people executed last year, first was found to be China. Strangely enough, the number of criminals executed in China is never officially released, but this number is predicted to be in the thousands (1000s). I see these as unnecessary and unfair deaths. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(2) …show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the death penalty fails to act as a deterrent to crime.
- Opines that governments must realize that capital punishment is not acting as the deterrent it was meant to be.
- Explains that fearing death is a natural biological angst that is said to be one of the greatest driving forces in psychological change.
- Explains that briseno fits the typical criminal criteria of troubled childhood, lacking a nurturing and loving home environment, and spent seventeen years on death row.
- Opines that the death sentence denies and devalues this form of rehabilitation. it is people like jose briseno who give the word redemption its meaning.
- Explains that the death penalty is irresponsible and irreversible. colin campbell ross, a 29 year old melbourne bar owner, was found guilty of sexual assault and murder.
- Explains that ross was convicted and executed despite overwhelming evidence to suggest otherwise. public pressure pushed for the police to make an arrest on the little evidence they had resulting in the arrest of ross.
- Explains that ross was convicted, sentenced, and hanged in melbourne. he wrote a final letter to his family, in which he stated "the day is coming when my innocence will be proved."
- Opines that capital punishment is not a viable way of dealing with offenders. when mistakes occur in the legal process, the sentence of death may not allow subsequent correction.
- States that the almost universal fear of death would support the death penalty as one of the biggest deterrents of criminal activity. this superstition is not backed by statistics and expert opinion.
- States that the study showed that murder rates in the u.s. in two thousand and five (2005) decreased. this decrease was forty six (46%) greater in states without the death penalty compared to those with.
- Explains that countries that are in favor of the death penalty argue that it is cheaper to execute a criminal than to keep him imprisoned for life.
- Concludes that it is more beneficial for both the state and the prisoner to not be put to death.
- Opines that the age of capital punishment should be over, humanity has evolved past this barbarism and so should the nations of the world.
- Opines that executing does not act as a deterrent for criminal activity that governments hope to create.
This is one of the supposed positive attributes of the death penalty that a government can cling to. This superstition is not backed by statistics and expert opinion. In 2009, an American study was released titled: "DO EXECUTIONS LOWER HOMICIDE RATES?: THE VIEWS OF LEADING CRIMINOLOGISTS". The study came to the conclusion that: “the death penalty does not add deterrent effects to those already achieved by long term …show more content…
This is mainly due to: “the long and complex judicial process for capital punishment cases.” Even with such systems in place, there can never be a guarantee of not executing an innocent person. The fact that this controversial “act of justice” is still occurring is astounding. There is more than enough evidence to conclude that it is more beneficial for both the state and the prisoner to not be put to death. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(14) I believe the age of capital punishment should be over, humanity has evolved past this barbarism and so should the nations of the world. I do not, for one minute condone criminal activity, but killing a being just for the sake of vengeance is wrong. We must think of the redeemed individuals like Jose Briseno, who in the face of inevitable demise, can make a positive
Related
- analytical
- opinion
- argumentative
- Capital Punishment: An Ongoing Arguementanalytical essaySince the year 1608, over 15,269 people have been executed in the United States and its predecessor colonies (Smykla, and Espy). With the multitude of persons executed, there is still little evidence proving the effectiveness of capital punishment when concerning future violent crime rates. The death penalty is also costly when compared to the cost of imprisoning a violent criminal for life. With such a definitive punishment and with its finality, there have also been a large number of persons executed who were in fact shown to be innocent at a later time. Although there is a lengthy history of the death penalty in the United States, there is an immense disparity in regards to those who support capital punishment and those who wish to abolish it, however, with the abundance of evidence in support of its abolishment, capital punishment should cease to exist in the United States until a time where it proves to be efficient and beneficial to society.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that capital punishment should cease in the united states until it proves to be efficient and beneficial to society.
- Explains that there is little evidence that capital punishment deters crime rates. there are many reasons why the death penalty does not deter crime, such as the prolonged time period on death row, the ease of appealing to reduce sentences to life in prison.
- Analyzes the cost of capital punishment and the overcrowding of prisons in the united states, and argues that it is not a large expense to the state and taxpayers.
- Analyzes how f. murray's article titled innocents on death row demonstrates that capital punishment is irresponsible and immoral.
- Argues that capital punishment should be abolished until it proves fiscally beneficial, has a deterrent effect on crime, and has 100% rate of innocent people not being sentenced to death row.
- Cites darehle, levitt, and shustorovich. "prison conditions, capital punishment,and deterrence." american law and economics review.
1042 wordsRead More - Persuasive Essay On Death Penaltyanalytical essayOne of the most repetitive and controversial topics discussed in the criminal justice system, is the death penalty. Capital punishment has been a part of our nation’s history since the creation of our constitution. In fact, as of January 1st, 2016, 2,943 inmates were awaiting their fate on death row (Death Penalty Information Center). Throughout my life, I have always been a strong advocate for the death penalty. During the majority of my undergraduate degree, I was a fierce supporter of capital punishment when discussing the topic in classes. However, throughout many criminal justice courses, I found myself in the minority, regarding the abolishment of the death penalty. While debating this topic, I would always find myself sympathetic to the victims and their families, as one should be, wanting those who were responsible for heinous crimes to
In this essay, the author
- Opines that capital punishment should be prohibited in the united states.
- Argues that capital punishment costs more than life in prison without the possibility of parole, because it is an irreversible sentence.
- Argues that people think capital punishment deters crime, but studies show no correlation between it and deterrence.
- Analyzes how racial biases influenced capital cases. mccleskey appealed his sentence to the supreme court on the grounds that the death penalty is inconsistent.
- Explains that the most fearful aspect of capital punishment is the possibility of the state or government executing the wrong person.
2435 wordsRead More - The Death Penalty: In The Name Of Justice?analytical essayThe state murdering people because of their crimes simply does not equate to justice. It is real easy to hear about how the government is doing this wrong or that, but the death penalty is abounded with so many injustices and faults that it’s an embarrassment to our entire due process of law. Supporters of capital punishment subscribe to religious and ethical points of view rather than facts, and when they do offer facts it’s always the same argument: “It’s a deterrent.” The death penalty is extreamly flawed, most notably it comes with a very high price tag to an already under-funded correctional institution in America; no stable argument has been installed to warrant it as a deterrent; and the moral decay it establishes creates among other things a feeling of revenge and spite within society.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the death penalty is an embarrassment to our due process of law. supporters of capital punishment subscribe to religious and ethical points of view rather than facts.
- Explains that many people for and against the death penalty are under the proposed belief that capital punishment is a deterrent for crime.
- Analyzes how the legal system is disturbingly unable to correctly administer the death penalty. almost thirty percent of americans can’t afford a lawyer.
- Argues that the death penalty saves money compared to life imprisonment. long and drawn-out court appeals must be installed at the taxpayer’s expense.
- Explains that many advocates of the death penalty rally their feelings of spite and revenge into the justice system.
- Argues that capital punishment is an obstacle to an already morally challenged society. it's time to move on.
885 wordsRead More - For example, if a murderer is caught for doing a horrible crime like killing someone he is then sentences to death too. In my opinion, it makes no sense because you are executing someone for killing another person, I find it rather hypocritical. They are trying to teach us that killing is wrong yet there so solution to said problem is to kill. Another problem is that the government is not the most honest and trustworthy people because they too are human and therefore, can be easily swayed especially when it comes to money. In an article it stated that, a number of persons executed in the United States were later cleared by confession of those who had initially committed the crimes (qtd. in Meehan). There is also the problem of racism and racial bias. Our nation’s death rows have always held a disproportionately large population of African Americans. Studies show that “black offenders who kill white victims are at greater risks of a death sentences than others” (qtd. in Bedah). So given this information, when those under death sentence are examined more closely, it turns out that race is a decisive factor after
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the death penalty is not effective and should be abolished due to its inhumane ways.
- Opines that the death penalty has more disadvantages than advantages in north america.
- Opines that the death penalty is inhumane and hypocritical. the government isn't honest and trustworthy and can be easily swayed especially when it comes to money.
- Explains that criminologists voted against having the death penalty in a state to lower the murder rate, and 91% of respondents said politicians support it to appear tough on crime.
- Explains that the third and most heartbreaking problem with the death penalty is that innocent people can be easily put to death for a crime they did not do.
- Argues that the death penalty deters some would-be murderers by showing them what happens once they are caught, or that executions save lives. however, these cases are rare given that we can never be too sure on whether or not someone really deserves to die.
- Explains that arkansas legislatures introduced a bill to abolish the death penalty, which was passed. other states are trying to reinstate it due to horrible crimes occurring.
- Opines that even the guilty have a right to life even if that is within four walls for all of eternity.
1328 wordsRead More - Persuasive Essay On Capital Punishmentanalytical essay“No matter how vicious the crime, no matter how vile the criminal, some death penalty opponents feel certain that nobody can ever deserve to die -- even if that person burned children alive, massacred a dozen strangers in a movie theater, or bombed the Boston Marathon. Other opponents admit the worst of the worst of the worst do deserve to die. They just distrust the government ever to get it right.”(Blecker, Robert 1) What is capital punishment, but insight into human morals and our sense of justice. For this very reason capital punishment is a debated controversy to this day. The death penalty as we know it is flawed, however it is still a proper punishment for those who commit heinous crimes.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that medical ethics preclude doctors from participating in executions. however, a doctor will certify the inmate is dead.
- Opines that the cost of a human life is priceless, and people's lives are at stake.
- Argues that the death penalty is open to corruption just as much as the rest of our crime system is.
- Concludes that the death penalty is not a flawed idea and can cause some good in the world. it forces people to sit back and realize what they are capable of upholding justice.
- Explains that the death penalty is flawed, but it is still a proper punishment for those who commit heinous crimes.
- Argues that lethal injections are highly opposed due to the fact that they have not been tested as vigorously. the firing squad, among all traditional methods, probably serves us best.
1944 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyanalytical essayWhile many oppose the death penalty, there are others who support it. One could say that the death penalty is not cruel or unusual, it is simply just the most suitable punishment for the crime the criminal committed(Sharp 247). The death penalty also provides reassurance and protection to the innocent as executed killers will never kill again, while there is always a possibility that living ones will(Sharp 247). One study from Emory University, shows that with each execution results in eighteen fewer murders(Sharp 247). Also, a study from the University of Houston, saw that when the executions were put on a short-term suspension in Texas, another 90-150 murders had been committed during that time(Sharp 247). This just shows that capital punishment discourages murderers more than other forms of legal penalizing. Just because capital punishment is possibly unconstitutional, it may not be a good reason to abolish it from all fifty states in the United
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the death penalty is a topic for debate and has been for countless years. the supreme court considers it constitutionally legal, but others view it as the opposite of constitutional.
- Analyzes how the european union's export ban on lethal injection drugs has made it difficult for the u.s. prisons to obtain them.
- Explains that lethal injections are not the only way that the death penalty can be carried out. seven states have reviewed legislative proposals to reinstate the customary ways of execution.
- Explains that while many oppose the death penalty, there are others who support it. it provides reassurance and protection to the innocent as executed killers will never kill again.
- Explains that there is an overturning rate of sixty-eight percent of death penalty cases from 1973-1995. the supreme court declared that the capital punishment system gains super due process.
- Explains that the eighth amendment was established in order to protect the people of the united states of america from cruel and unusual punishment.
890 wordsRead More - Death Penalty Debateargumentative essayMany believe that the death penalty is a deterrence, however many studies on deterrence and the death penalty do not support this idea, in fact the murder rates in states that do not have the death penalty is consistently lower than in the states with the death penalty. Studies have also shown that of the 16,503 homicides in 2003, only 144 were sentenced to death, and of the 3374 inmates on death row only 65 were executed. When criminals commit crimes such as murder, the threat of execution does not enter their minds, especially those who may be under the influence of drugs or alcohol. In the en...
In this essay, the author
- Opines that life imprisonment is best for all, realistically, and most effective. the process of prosecuting and convicting an individual is astronomical.
- Explains that the death penalty is more expensive than life imprisonment without parole, and that it is the most inefficient use of tax dollars.
- Explains that there are three phases to prosecute a capital murder, although this may differ slightly from state to state depending on those particular states laws.
- Argues that the death penalty violates the eighth and the fourteenth amendments and is "cruel and unusual."
- Concludes that the death penalty is morally and inherently wrong, and that it should not be at the cost of society as a whole.
- Explains the reasons why the death penalty should not be used in america.
- Explains that retribution plays a role in the death penalty, stating that criminals should be punished according to "just deserts," meaning that the severity of punishments must be proportional to the crime.
- Explains that bedau, h. a., and donohue, j. (2006), use and abuses of empirical evidence in the death penalty debate.
1792 wordsRead More - Capital Punishment is Murderanalytical essayAmerican history is replete with examples of brutality and foolishness that will forever blot the American conscience. Early in this century, Sacco and Vanzetti were railroaded for a murder of which they were almost certainly innocent. The trial was a farce, and the verdict was a more a result of bias against Italians than of the evidence. Their lives were forfeit. Later in the century, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were tried for conspiracy to commit espionage. Despite questionable evidence and even more questionable conduct on the part of prosecuting attorneys and government agencies, they were convicted; the verdict was a statement of public hysteria and fear of Communism. They too met the executioner. Not yet ingrained in the annals of history, in the past months the state of Texas executed a man who even the state admitted had not pulled the trigger, but was only an accomplice. If the recent elections prove anything, it is that these examples of the state-sanctioned murders of innocents have done nothing to change the American mind. Many Republicans ran and won on a "law and order" platform; in New York, Governor George Pataki defeated former Governor Mario Cuomo largely on the basis of Cuomo's opposition to capital punishment. This article is an appeal to readers' morality, to their consciences. It does attempt to show that the death penalty is costly and impractical (though it is), or that it is unconstitutional (which it may well be). The article is an appeal for mercy.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that american history is replete with examples of brutality and foolishness that will forever blot the american conscience.
- Opines that the death penalty is imperfect and guarantees innocent people will be put to death. the finality of execution distinguishes capital punishment.
- Argues that capital punishment advocates dismiss the murder of innocents at the hands of the state as a necessary evil.
- Argues that the capriciousness of capital punishment violates the basic tenets of our criminal justice system, which discriminates on the basis of race, wealth, and fame.
- Explains that race is not the sole subject of bias in capital cases, as poor defendants are represented by inadequate and incompetent counsel. this bias affects the district attorney's decision to ask for the death penalty.
- Explains that capital punishment is often used as a political tool with little regard for the person whose life hangs in the balance.
- Argues that the best argument against capital punishment stems from a basic feeling of human compassion.
1748 wordsRead More - death penaltyanalytical essay... 32 murders deterred for each execution” (Fagan) and that for deterrence to be effective the executions resulting from death sentences need to be carried out at a significant enough frequency that the would-be murderers would be forced to say to themselves “if I committed this murder, I will be put to death without fail”. The problem with deterrence is the enormous length of time it takes to simply process the paperwork, let alone carry out the execution of a convicted inmate. In the worst case scenarios, it may even take up to 15 or 20 years to carry out the execution. Setting all this aside, the main argument for death penalties is directly contradicted by the information released by the ‘Death Penalty Information Center’ which reveals that the States which do not have a death penalty do, in fact, have lower murder rates and are able to maintain it consistently.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the criminal justice system is unplanned, unwanted, and a disruption to one's life.
- Explains that 183 'convicts' have been exonerated by new dna evidence in the 15 years prior to 2006 alone. glenn ford is the latest in a long line of people who were wrongly accused, convicted, and sentenced to death.
- Explains that the death penalty has a long and controversial history in the united states of america, going back as far as the ‘salem witch hunts’.
- Argues that the death penalty is not without its flaws. even the more vocal supporters of the system like ernest van den haag recognized and acknowledged its limitations.
- Analyzes the results of a poll by lake research partners in 2010, which shows that 61% of voters do not approve of the death penalty, even though 6% may not be completely against it.
- Opines that the us justice system is not perfect, regardless of what anyone may claim. the us needs to strive to make its system as impartial and flawless as possible.
- Argues that the death penalty and capital punishment is a necessary evil to control crime and prevent first degree offences in the country.
- Explains that a poll by the death penalty information center shows that the death penalty does not serve such purpose argued by these pro-death penalty agents.
- Argues that the main argument for death penalties is directly contradicted by the ‘death penalty information center’ which reveals that states without a death penalty have lower murder rates.
1457 wordsRead More - Capital Punishment And Death Penaltyanalytical essay... execute should not be made lightly, and tests should be done to ensure the right person is being punished for the crime that was committed. Taking away the person’s life who is responsible for the death of another person cannot bring the victim back and does not solve anything. Various people all over the world believe that the death penalty should not be supported and that it should be abolished. Many reasons exist for the abolition of the death penalty to take place including cost issues, religious issues, whether or not it acts as a deterrent, executing innocents and the harshness of the execution. Some may say the people who committed the most heinous crimes deserve to have justice served to them. However, even murderers are humans and should be treated fairly and justly. All people, even the guilty have a right to live; regardless of the crimes they committed.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the cost of capital punishment is a major problem. death-penalty trials cost $1 million more than life without parole cases.
- Analyzes how the cost of the death penalty is a major factor in the debate against capital punishment.
- Explains that religion is a major part of the debate surrounding the death penalty.
- Explains that although some religions support the death penalty, many others don't. modern society has other ways to punish those who need it.
- Explains that the death penalty is a major problem for many people. studies show that each execution deters an average of eighteen murders.
- Argues that the evidence that supports the claims of executions successfully deterring crime is weak and inconclusive.
- Explains that many people have been proven to be innocent during the time the death penalty has been allowed. mistakes are an irreversible act and can cost people their lives.
- Opines that people who were exonerated were released from death row as a result of dna testing. curtis mccarty was wrongfully accused of murder and rape, but his innocence was proven too late.
- Argues that the death penalty should be outlawed because of its unconstitutional methods of execution.
- Opines that retribution is a horrible and wrong reason to justify executions of death row prisoners.
2563 wordsRead More