The event bought up some disputes in the U.S. legal system and race. Stinney was executed 84 days after the killing of the two girls in March 1944. George Stinney lived in Claredon County, South Carolina, was convicted in a one-day trial of first degree murder of two white girls who were riding their bikes close to Stinney house. The two little girls were Betty Binnicker, 11 years old and Mary Emma Thames 8 years old. “After being arrested, Stinney was said to have confessed to the crime. However, there was no written record of his confession apart from notes provided by an investigating deputy, and no transcript of the brief trial. He had been executed by electric chair” (Bever, 2014). Since, his execution, there have been many questions raised about Stinney guilt, his confession, and the trial processing leading to his
In the video “The Confessions” presented by Frontline, a murder of a women that was committed by one man, quickly resulted into a false gang murder-rape scene committed by eight men. The victim, Michelle Bosko, was seen to be raped and killed in her apartment in Norfolk, Virginia. From the video, it has been proven that seven out of the eight men that confessed were innocent, but somehow they all received an unequal punishment. Because the innocent men admitted to a murder that they didn’t commit out of fear, they were all sentenced to some time in prison. The head detective, Glenn Ford, intimidated the men so much that they either were convinced that they were at the crime scene or they told him every detail that he wanted to hear. Years after the murder had been put to rest, the police received a letter from an African American man stating that he killed Michelle himself. Omar Ballard, the actual man who murdered Michelle, did not only admit that he killed Michelle, he admitted the he acted alone. Even after his confession and his DNA matched the crime scene, the Norfolk police d...
The death penalty is absolutely outrageous. There is no real reason that the government should feel that it has the right to execute people. Capital punishment is murder just as much as the people being executed murdered. The is no need for the death penalty and it needs to be abolished. It goes against the Constitution which states that there will be no cruel and unusual punishment. There is nothing crueler than killing a person.
In 1944, 14-year old African American, George Stinney, was wrongfully convicted and executed. According to Murderpedia.org, a digital database containing the collective history of notorious murders, the event took place in Alcolu, South Carolina. Stinney remains the youngest person executed in United States history. Stinney was accused of first-degree murder. He was charged with the murder of 11-year old Betty June Binnicker and 8-year old Mary Emma Thames. Stinney was executed by the formal method of execution at the time, the electric chair. The trial concluded in one day. After Stinney was arrested he was not allowed to see his family until after the trial and conviction concluded. Stinney reportedly confessed to the crime according to the investigating deputy, even though a confession statement by George Stinney never existed. In 2013 Stinney’s descended family petitioned for a retrial. On December 17, 2014, George Stinney’s case
On August 20th, 1989 Lyle and Erik Menendez killed their parents inside their Beverly Hills home with fifteen shot gun blasts after years of alleged “sexual, psychological, and corporal abuse” (Berns 25). According to the author of “Murder as Therapy”, “The defense has done a marvelous job of assisting the brothers in playing up their victim roles” (Goldman 1). Because there was so much evidence piled up against the brothers, the defense team was forced to play to the jurors’ emotions if they wanted a chance at an acquittal. Prosecutor Pamela Bozanich was forced to concede that “Jose and Kitty obviously had terrific flaws-most people do in the course of reminding jurors that the case was about murder, not child abuse” (Adler 103). Bozanich “cast the details of abuse as cool, calculated lies” (Smolowe 48)...
While researching this case I stumbled upon many others and I became aware of how many people have suffered from the injustice of being found guilty. While reading parts of the book “Real Justice: Fourteen and Sentenced to Death the Story of Steven Truscott” I learned that the police played a large role in why 14-year-old Truscott was found guilty of murder. The book showed that they forced witnesses to change their story to further “prove” Truscott’s guilt of the crime. This led to the conclusion that in this case (like many others) the police were solely and unjustly targeting one
...lice or lawyers used their integrity. The police skirted around the law and use evidence that the witnesses said was not correct. They had a description of the suspect that did not match Bloodsworth but, they went after him as well. They also used eyewitness testimony that could have been contaminated.
Michael and Derrick both struck a deal in exchange for implicating Andy as the one who fired the fatal shots. Under Colorado’s felony murder rule, Andy could be found guilty of first-degree murder just for simply participating in a violent felony. Of the three boys, Andy would be the only one to stand trial for first-degree murder, which could carry a mandatory sentence of life without parole. In May 2001, Andy went to trial, after a brief deliberation, the jury found Andy guilty of robbery and murder in the first-degree. Andy has been serving his sentence in a Colorado State Penitentiary, the state’s “supermax” high-security prison for the past 9 ye...
Determining which model of criminal justice best explains how this case was handled presents an interesting challenge and requires close examination. Bohm and Haley (2014) state there is no "innocent until proven guilty" thought process with the crime control model. Additionally, the model seeks to efficiently resolve cases quickly which requires …"cases be handled informally..." (Bohm et al., 2014). Conversely, "[T]he due process model is based on the doctrine of legal guilt and the presumption of innocence" (Bohm et al., 2014, p. 15). I see a combination of both models, the crime control model and the due process model, competing with each other, oftentimes within the same group of people.
A seven year old girl was found half-naked, with over 20 stab wounds, behind a washroom. Three men were brought into questioning after a witness claims that the three men were seen drinking at the time of the murder. At the station, police finally got answers after one of the three men broke down, confessing that he killed the girl, while another admitted to raping her. The man who admitted to stabbing the girl added that he had no memory of raping her but realized that he had, in fact, stabbed her to death. He claims that he was high on shabu and had been drinking for the past three days.