Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The advantages of space exploration
Advantage of space exploration
The advantages of space exploration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The advantages of space exploration
The interest surrounding travel to Mars started in the 1950s with gaining sight of the new planet. Today, people continue to argue over whether the United States and NASA should continue its expansion by exploring Mars and the solar system. Looking at past experiences with going into space, there have been advances, such as going to the moon, as well as problems like space shuttle mishaps. American society continues to look towards the future for new information including space exploration; however people also do not feel it is necessary to have human space exploration, but people are still intrigued by competition over space exploration. For example, the ‘Space Race’ between the United States and Russia when trying to gather as much information …show more content…
An article from the Christian Science Monitor, “NASA and Obama's budget: the politics and ideals of human space exploration”, discusses how lawmakers in the United States government do not agree with sending anymore people into space. They feel, “Too many Americans and lawmakers reacted negatively to the initial White House plan for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration”. That plan has a goal to invest in America’s global leadership and competitiveness and to maximize the use of taxpayer dollars. The article continues to say that lawmakers still see human exploration to specific destinations in space as a “compelling frontier - not just for the nation but humanity, too”. They feel that it is too dangerous in the way that it would look bad for the country, and for humanity in general. Obama said that he would also like to see people be able to learn and function outside of Earth’s boundaries. But, the American society must find a ‘political middle’ in order to support NASA’s wishes and the American people. Likewise, from the Pew Research Center, writer Brian Kennedy helped to conduct a 2014 poll on how “Americans and scientists agree on the value of space exploration, but disagree on the importance of human astronauts”. He writes, “A majority of Americans (59%) considered the use of human astronauts in the future to be essential, while 39% viewed astronauts as not essential. AAAS members were closely divided, with 47% saying that human astronauts are essential and 52% saying they are not”. AAAS members are involved in the American Association for the Advancement of Science. These experts feel that human space exploration is not needed in society because machines can do the same research avoiding less risk for
Bill Nye, the “Science Guy,” asserts, “NASA is an engine of innovation and inspiration as well as the world's premier space exploration agency, and we are well served by politicians working to keep it that way, instead of turning it into a mere jobs program, or worse, cutting its budget.” The United States of America’s government is currently in an economic debt encompassing billions of US dollars. Unfortunately, the government has attempted to balance finances by cutting the funding for most programs, including NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA, in over half a century, has brought the most economic, technological, and social benefits than any other program held here in the USA, as well as any other extraterrestrial program in the world. The last thing this nation needs is the cutting of NASA finances. NASA should be receiving more funding because the Earth will not last forever and humans will need a place to live, there’s a curiosity within humans about the vast universe they live in, there is evidence to suggest life on other planets, the USA’s superpower status will be improved, and the economical income NASA brings is more efficient than any other governmental or educational program.
The word race is defined at its core as a competition between runners, horses, vehicles, boats, etc. to see which is the fastest in covering a set course. Well, interestingly enough, a race of a different kind occurred between two countries from the years 1957 to 1969. The competition was unclear, and the opponents were on two entirely different continents, not something as simplistic as two horses. The United States and the United Soviet States of Russia both set out as arch rivals in the “Space Race,” a quest for dominance beyond the known Planet Earth. Ironically enough, just as communism was spreading to all parts of the world, the United States always sought to squash this form of government, despite somewhat dire consequences. Now, with
This assertion is quantified and supported by data, as a 2013 Phillips & Company poll found that approximately seventy-five percent of adult Americans support the doubling of NASA’s budget (to one percent of the federal budget), with an emphasis on that funding being allocated towards space travel, particularly to Mars. Space travel fulfills both desires for basic and applied science—as the latter is used to work towards the former in the field—and can be used as a model for the two realms to work in tandem to achieve more complete science in other fields. Rather than those who apply science—such as the hardware and software engineers and scientists of Roving Mars, by Steve Squyres—and those who seek to gain fundamental knowledge from that application—such as the research scientists, including Squyres himself, from the same book—battling amongst themselves—as they often do early in the book—the two groups of people and scientific styles need to work cooperatively in order to achieve the most meaningful results possible—which is seen as the result of the Roving Mars team’s efforts, as the Opportunity rover is still functioning and collecting data. Thus, rather than asserting the supremacy of either basic or applied science, as Mukherjee tends to do for the former, it is essential to recognize the vital nature of both realms of science,
As humans our desire to visit space has never ceased, but our scientific advances have so far only allowed manned visits to the moon. There are many political factors that influence the ongoing attempts to engineer space tourism and future missions to Mars, which has been in the works since the twentieth century. High costs and risks involved in spaceflight due to the longevity in space and the effects of cosmic rays have been many of the setbacks in making it a reality. The United States is currently unable to conduct human spaceflight after losing its capability to launch upon the retirement of the space shuttle in 2011. China National Space Administration and Russia Federal Space Agency are the only two government facilities that continue sending humans to space. Should spaceflight agencies continue manned missions to outer space? I believe that many people are not aware of all the knowledge we have gained from sending trained professionals into outer space in the past. Global issues amongst many other problems have been improved due to necessary collaborations made in the name of science and exploration.
However, while space exploration- essentially research- is thought to cater to the Americans as a whole, the goal for companies like SpaceX or Blue origin-private space ventures- is meant to cater to the desires and CEO’s or leaders. NASA, funded by American tax dollars, is meant to procure knowledge for the American public. However, ironically, the majority of the country seeks no interest in pursuing space exploration and more specifically doesn't want to see their tax dollars going to a program they seek no interest in. In fact, in an Msnbc, meet the press edition, with Michael Griffin, NASA Administrator and MODERATOR Tim Russert describes that 60% of Americans demonstrated no interest or appeal for space exploration, and more importantly, public space funding(Russert).
HALVORSON, TODD. "As uncertainty grows over future of U.S. human spaceflight, NASA workers grow anxious". Gannett News Service. 29 Jan 2010 eLibrary. Web. 18 Feb 2010.
When talking about the current space program, Neil Degrasse Tyson once said, “I got angry with America, because advancing is not just something you do incrementally. You need innovation as well, so that your advances are revolutionary, not merely evolutionary” (Tyson 3). America used to have the top space program in the world. Being first to the moon excited the country and gave everyone a sense of pride and fulfillment. Lately, though, we have been falling behind in space exploration. A successful space program is needed in America, and here’s why: we are losing our grip on the title as the world superpower and a new age of economics and politics is coming faster than we are prepared for. To be prepared for this new age we need the funds,
Lind, Michael. "Why We Should Embrace the End of Human Spaceflight."Salon.com. N.p.: n.p., 2011. N. pag. Rpt. in NASA. Ed. Margaret Haerens. Detroit: Greenhaven, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Mar. 2014.
In conclusion, Continuing NASA and the programs run by it, is harmful to American society and Government. NASA harms the economy. NASA also harms the environment in which we live. And the money that NASA spends could be used to help solve problems in our country, not on another planet. Only if we work together, fixing our own problems first, respectfully with each other, as one body, one world, and one planet, then we will be able to reach out into space. We will be able to explore it safely, efficiently, and environmentally soundly.
It is within man’s blood and nature to explore, and space is our next New World. Man’s first achievement in space travel was the launch of the Sputnik on October 4, 1957. For the next decades, space travel was roaring like a rocket, fueled by man’s desire to explore, man’s desire for knowledge, and man’s desire to beat his enemies. However, these impulses have died out as the well of government funding has been diverted to wars and debts, and the interest of the American people has been diverted to wars and debts. Amidst all these issues it is debated as to whether or not space travel is worth the money and the attention of scientists, particularly since humanity faces so many issues on earth currently. However, because of the past inventions, current services, and future benefits, space travel is indeed worth the money and attention of governments and people. It is within our hands to control man’s advancement, and space travel is the next venue to do so.
Carl Sagan once said “every planetary civilization will be endangered by impacts from space, every surviving civilization is obliged to become spacefaring—not because of exploratory or romantic zeal, but for the most practical reason imaginable: staying alive. If our long-term survival is at stake, we have a basic responsibility to our species to venture to other worlds.” The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, or NASA, is executing Sagan’s words every day. President Dwight D. Eisenhower created NASA in 1958 with the purpose of peaceful rather than military space exploration and research to contribute to society. Just 11 years after the creation, NASA put Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the moon, the first humans to accomplish this feat.
Mankind has always been fascinated with exploring the unknown. From sailing to distant lands to someday setting foot on other planets, the spirit of exploration is the same. Bur now with the current economic situation and the high cost of sending people to space, NASA is being looked at as a way to free up some much needed funds. Although, there is many problems here on planet Earth that need addressing, the benefits of space exploration far out weight the disadvantages. Space exploration has given us more advanced technology, advances in the medical field, and a boost to the economy and these facts cannot be disputed.
In America, space travel is a controversial issue that many discuss. Although exciting, some people find it unnecessary and a waste of money. There are also many risks associated with space travel and many issues are more important than space travel that should be focused on. There are ethical, diplomatic, and economic issues that need to be considered before making decisions about space exploration.
The 1960's brought new advancements for all of Earth. Machines and men were sent into space, and this sparked a new government agency, called NASA. Space was a new frontier, and virtually everyone was interested in exploring it. Over the years, the interest in space exploration has weakened, and NASA was almost terminated from existence, although there have been many advancements in it over that time. Space exploration should continue because it could help solve many problems on Earth, such as overpopulation and lack of resources. Exploration of the final frontier must continue in order for human life to continue.
As such, this essay will argue that space exploration is a necessity of our kind and that NASA should be progressively more financed. To begin with, space research has helped bring several developments to modern science, affecting the quality of our everyday lives. With issues like climate change, and population overgrowth, our species faces the risks of major extinction (4). Climate change has been a man-made problem in recent years that threatens our planet. It will take huge mitigations from current and future societies to even come close to reversing climate change.