Lane Kenworthy mentioned in his book, Social Democratic America, that the No Child Left Behind reform is useful, but it is by any means not making schools better. The reform does not benefit all children; back to the classroom with one quarter of the children that attended an early education program, those children within the one-quarter will be stuck at the rest of the class’s level. Those one-quarter children will not be able to move forward until the other students catc... ... middle of paper ... ...em unreasonable, but if we think about how much our government spends on programs designed for the educational problem, it would be substantially saving money. Consider this, we have many problems within the school system such as children getting held back, adolescents not having the desire to graduate high school, and dropouts. An early educational program would adjust these problems and give children the incentive to carry on with their education.
There is no surer way to guarantee that our children continue to receive an increasingly inferior education than by continuing to insulate public schools from the very market forces that would promote higher quality education at lower prices. Our country has achieved the highest standard living in the history of the world by encouraging and fostering competition and choice in the marketplace, not by restricting the choices available to consumers. A voucher system would be a good start at restoring competition and parental choice in education.
Generally speaking, children from the high SES family have better opportunities to get appropriate education and succeed in the society. On the other hand, children from the low SES family often face many difficulties in the educational process because of the financial problem and might get less support from their families. Therefore, in my opinion, this is the group that the government need to take care of. We need to provide children from the low SES family with opportunities as much as possible to help them succeed in the school and the society. One of the opportunities we can provide for those children is school choice.
All in all Krugman is saying that the only way for children in this day in age to receive a good education is by either being from an upper class family or making the public believe that your upper class, even though you can not afford that lifestyle. Which is not necessarily true because if you are willing to work hard enough you can go as far as you want in education. Just think there is always scholarships and programs available for people who are very dedicated to school and their career that can maybe help aid them financially. For example one of my friends that I know who isn 't from the wealthiest family still managed to make it into a good school because he was a good student and was willing to go above and beyond. So does coming from a wealthy family make it easier for you to get into a better school
Equal school funding is at the top of my list when it comes to poverty and inequality in the school system. Although schools are educating more young people than ever before, their deficit of funds and programs hinder them from meeting the needs of an array of students.
The environment in which a student learns greatly affects the knowledge and skills they take away from their educational experience. The debate about what classroom setting provides the most effective learning will probably be argued until the end of time. Special education budgets account for a great deal of money so it is obvious that the allocation of these funds needs to be used in the most efficient way possible. There are two main sides of this argument inclusion and exclusion. The inclusion side wants to integrate students with disabilities into classroom with students without disabilities.
There are many issues to deal with in country, but education seems to get to the bottom of the list. We tend to focus more on helping others outside of the country than focusing on our own problems. One big issue that needs to be addressed is the poor quality of the public school system from K-12. The government needs to step in and put in more resources into education than to wars that have no win/win outcomes. The US has enough financial and other resources to improve the quality of public education.
According to (NCES) the average school size for a central city, state-funded school is 1,083 compared to 398 in privately funded school. That means teachers will have an even harder time giving a state-funded the same one on one time when compared to the privately funded school. Since the education is not equal to private schools should be abolished. Education should be equal because everyone deserves to be educated no matter of financial background. Schooling provides a lot of benefits for students and the separation elevates one student over another.
Despite the fact that funding on public education will not help students succeed academically with the money provided to the schools, every school deserves to get as much money because students will receive more proper education and will be more successful students in the future. Funding on Public Education will help students get the updated devices that will help them comprehend. An example would be “...Technology makes a difference in improving test scores and helping students reach performance goals. Technology is a very big important thing in schools for the students. Part of the funding given by the state is implied to the technological devices, so the students can have programs that help them understand certain or all school subjects required for them to go forward.
Though this is with good intent, it can... ... middle of paper ... ... test scores lower than their actual capabilities. This makes standardized testing a fallible source for statistics regarding a school’s progress in improving the education of its students. These results demonstrate a need for our federal government to further understand the education system and the impact of their decisions on the children of the United States of America. The goal of teaching all children and providing them with equal opportunities has diminished the quality of education in America; however, this problem can be solved. By working with teachers, professors, and even students, lawmakers should be able to predict these adverse effects and prevent them.