Persuasive Essay On Right Or Wrong

687 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Same sex marriage controversial issues essay

Since the first day of humanities the right and wrong was and still hard to define. The definition of right and wrong is differentiating from place to another and from one culture to another and even within the same culture. In this paper I will argue that there is not such thing to justify that an act is right if the rest act the same way in similar circumstances.
To start this discussion let consider a person X who is stealing others belonging. This act is not acceptable by most people, but what about if every body starts stealing can this act be justified or become right?according to Kant’s deontological moral theory, the rightness or wrongness of action does not depend on their consequence but on whether they fulfill our duty. As a result of this theory stealing in our case is justified simply because it satisfies the person desire to get thing that other people spend their own money to own. So if we accept the fact that steeling is not wrong then everybody will start doing it. As a result the society and civilization at large will be collapse. One could argue that the act of stealing is happening because the person is in need. But how we can scale this needs? The human by nature are greedy, so they will never stop asking for more and more.
If we all agree that a wrong act done by all people, then this act will transform to a right act. Take for example the homosexuality. It was until a few years ago a wrong act .It was rejected as a bad act. Now, if all population shift to homosexuality this act will be right. Although this sequence appears to be logically true .It would be wrong to claim that same gender can married to same gender and have children. Because the nature does not allow such thing to happen. This is why the ri...

... middle of paper ...

... But if you don't believe in God, can you still believe in objective morality? To explain more do you believe that What are "right" and "wrong" today will be that way for all times and all cultures?. I don’t think so as we discussed earlier for the homosexuality.
Ones can argue that there is a subjective morality. Any idea of right or wrong come up with by a human is by definition subjective. That's all well and good. Problem is that it only applies to people who believe in it and it gives them no authority to proclaim anything as "what we should be doing." Very often everybody disagrees with each other and we don't get anywhere.
Weighing the pros and cons .I come to the conclusion that Without God, there is no such thing as right and wrong, only the things we call right and wrong. And since nobody can agree on what to call what, we're all in a lot of trouble

Show More
Related

  • Subjectivity Vs. Objectivity Morality

    1214 Words  | 3 Pages

    Well now that you understand what comes from subjective morality, let's look into objective. Objective morality is the view on life that there are rules in regards to morality, about a person's behavior. There are 2 ways you can come about these moral rules; religiously or scientifically. Let's first look at morals from a religious point of view. More specifically Christianity. The purpose of Christianity is to follow the teachings of Jesus, and obey what He says. Within this belief system God is ultimately good. And to be good you must become more like God. What are Gods attributes? Goodness, righteous hate, justice, knowledge, love, rationality, mercy, speech, truthfulness, and wisdom. We can see that if a person did these things we have a perfectly good person. Let's now take a step back. Addressing what evolution, and science has to say about objective morality. The ironic thing is one of the things evolutionists and Christians can agree on. That morality isn't subjective. As for the moment there is a developing theory on humans containing a moral gene. Previously within evolution it was always assumed parents and religious practices taught right from wrong. This was more of a subjective view. As of the last decade or so there has been new developments on digging deeper into where truly morality comes from. There have been multiple primatologists and biologists supposing a theory that morals have originated from our ancestors, and have been evolving over time. Do to the social behaviors of apes and other species. The apes showing empathy, and having essential mammal group behaviors. It translates into simplistic moral behaviors of apes. Nicholas Wade, a writer on psychological maters for The New York Times, spoke on such matters "Marc D. Hauser, a Harvard biologist, has built on this idea to propose that people are born with a moral grammar wired into their neural circuits by evolution." Wade

    Read More

  • Reason Vs Hume Essay

    814 Words  | 2 Pages

    middle of paper ... ... However, including God in the discussion of morality is difficult due to God not being a naturally occurring sentiment that would affect judgment. Both stances on the subject of morality are very valid as well as very different, but I believe both feelings and reason are necessary to find an accurate moral philosophy model.

    Read More

  • Morality And Objective Morality

    1498 Words  | 3 Pages

    The position that I hold regarding the essay’s question is that I do not believe in an objective morality or in objective moral truths, I believe that all morality is entirely relative and subjective based on cultural norms because moral relativism is the philosophized meaning that right and wrong are not absolute values and that they are personalized based on the individual and the circumstances or cultural orientation. Morality applies within cultures but not across them. Ethical or cultural relativism and the various schools of pragmatism ignore the fact that certain ethical percepts probably grounded in human nature do appear to be universal and ancient, if not eternal. Ethical codes also vary in different societies, economies, and geographies

    Read More

  • God is Not Great by Christopher Hitchens

    1309 Words  | 3 Pages

    Morality and ethics have always been a large source of debate and contention between different factions of various interests, beliefs, and ideals due to its centrality and foundational role in society and civilization and incredible importance to everyday life and decision making. In many of these disputes religious belief, or a lack thereof, serves as an important driving force behind one or both sides of the argument. In the modern world, one of the bigger instances of this can be seen in the many debates between Atheistic and religious individuals about the implications of religious belief on morality. One of the most famous Atheists, Christopher Hitchens, asserts that religion is not only unnecessary for morality, but actually impedes it. In his work God is Not Great: Why Religion Poisons Everything, Christopher Hitchens challenges religious believers to “name an ethical statement or action, made or performed by a person of faith that could not have been made or performed by a non-believer”, and proudly states afterwards that many have made the attempt but no one has given him a satisfactory answer. However, the best response to this challenge is to point out the inherent flaws in his logic, the unfairness of his challenge, and the fact that Hitchens is asking the wrong question in the first place.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Right To Die

    716 Words  | 2 Pages

    The right to choose is one of the most hotly contested ideas in America. While abortion is the topic that usually comes to mind, the right to die is a debate that is becoming more prevalent in our society every day. Dr. Kevin Fitzpatrick writes in “Euthanasia: we can live without it…,” that people should not be able to choose if they can die. He defends his ideas by showing how euthanasia is not a fully regulated practice and not always done legally. He goes on to say that most people who choose euthanasia do not have terminal illnesses and are usually just unhappy with their lives. However, Dr. Philip Nitschke disagrees in “Euthanasia: Hope you never need it, but be glad the option is there,” saying that we should have euthanasia as a viable option. Nitschke believes that people should be able to have euthanasia as an option to put in their living will in cases of

    Read More

  • Right to Die: An Examination of Euthanasia

    2090 Words  | 5 Pages

    My claim: I argue in favor of the right to die. If someone is suffering from a terminal illness that is: 1) causing them great pain – the pain they are suffering outweighs their will to live (clarification below) 2) wants to commit suicide, and is of sound mind such that their wanting is reasonable. In this context, “sound mind” means the ability to logically reason and not act on impulses or emotions. 3) the pain cannot be reduced to the level where they no longer want to commit suicide, then they should have the right to commit suicide. It should not be considered wrong for someone to give that person the tools needed to commit suicide.

    Read More

  • Military Persuasive Essay

    1088 Words  | 3 Pages

    What is morality? Merriam-Webster dictionary states that morality is/are the beliefs about what right behavior is and what wrong behavior is

    Read More

  • Do The Right Thing Essay

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    The film Do the Right Thing is set in Bedford-Stuyvesant. It begins with Sal, an Italian American, and his sons who run a pizzeria in a neighborhood where minorities live. Mookie, played by Spike Lee, is the pizzeria’s delivery boy who is working on the hottest day of summer which ends up being the same day everyone decides they are fed up with the subtle racism that goes on between races. This separation between races leads to Buggin Out, a frequent customer of the pizzeria, boycotting the establishment because there were no pictures of black people on Sal’s wall. This anger cause Sal and eventually Mookie to explode and react to the situation with violence. Sal’s anger leads to the death of an influential man in the community while Mookie’s anger leads to the destruction of Sal’s shop.

    Read More

  • Thomas Aquinas And The Natural Law Theory

    910 Words  | 2 Pages

    The idea that the belief in God is necessary for an individual to have any moral basis would insinuate that the individual either has no reason to act moral, as they have no fear of the supposed spiritual consequences such as entrance to heaven or hell, or that they literally no idea as to what is morally right and wrong, due to the lack of God’s influence of their morality in their upbringing up to that point. This God is most commonly referred, or at least implied to be, the Christian God. Christians would point out that the entire reasoning behind labeling certain actions as either good or evil is because of the existence of God, as he and the bible set the moral standard in which actions are judged by. Posing the question of whether or not God is a necessity for morality brings up further, less easy to understand questions such as whether things have intrinsic value if there is no God, and if so, what things do have intrinsic value and why would they?

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay For English Class

    772 Words  | 2 Pages

    I should receive a passing grade in this class because I can write now. Not just an exaggeration, but after another semester of English I finally feel confident that can write. Three of the reasons behind my confidence is I learned, I experienced and best of all I repeated. These three values helped prepare me for what is in store in English 1302 and here is why.

    Read More

  • Essay On Right And Wrong

    1012 Words  | 3 Pages

    What if I told you that everything you did was wrong? Well, C.S. Lewis would probably say that the differences between right and wrong are truly up to the Law of Nature, while Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would most likely bring up the point that only God could judge what is right and wrong. The concept of “right” vs. “wrong” is one that is debated a great deal in literature, particularly Lewis’ Mere Christianity and Dr. King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail. The different perceptions of from where man’s morality stems and what truly defines right and wrong are controlled by a higher power than man.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay: Defend Your Choice

    386 Words  | 1 Pages

    Roe v. Wade: the Supreme Court case legalizing a woman's right to choose abortion has been around our entire lives. In 27 years, memories of back alley clinics have faded - the past is past, right? Wrong. It's too soon to start taking reproductive freedoms for granted. The next president will appoint two or three Supreme Court justices, potentially changing the Court's position on this pivotal case. George W. Bush supports the Republican call for a constitutional amendment outlawing abortions; do you think he, if elected, would appoint pro-choice justices? And why is it that while the majority of Americans support choice, the majority of Congress votes anti-choice? Are we supposed to just stand by and watch as the government tries to legislate our bodies?

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Appropriate Behavior

    1522 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to Fablo, a 10-year-old called in a fake bomb threat to his school. A 15-year-

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay: The Importance Of Choice

    791 Words  | 2 Pages

    Have you ever woken up in the morning and felt like not going to the college the whole day? Of course you have. You think of skipping all the classes, but then you contemplate on the consequences of the choice. The attendance will suffer. You’d miss out on that important question or in some people’s case you’d miss out on the exam. You vote against it and go. Now in the above case you had a choice of whether to go to the classes or not, and you chose to go. That decision may prove to be fruitful or a rather disastrous one, but whatever it may be you have to deal with the consequences that come with it. We make countless decisions every day, every moment and once a choice has been made, the actions play out, and the consequence is delivered. We have to live with those consequences. Our choices and decisions guide our lives and build our futures. Whether people notice it or not, the choices we make today affect our tomorrow.

    Read More

  • If God Does Not Exist, Then Everything Is Permitted

    1259 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many of us have wondered about the role of a Deity, in defining our moral code, and this has been a subject of discourse among scholars and philosophers since centuries. Many define morality as the innate ability of the human conscience to draw input for decisions which they believe is present there by itself. While some say that the (belief on the) presence of God gives them strength and inspiration to overcome their inability to follow moral standards (which are already defined) especially when they conflict with their self-interests. Although, some people argue that social stimulus imposes limits to one’s actions even if God does not exist. However, a person is at absolute liberty to perform, whatsoever one wants to in the non-existence of God because one does not regard anything as right or wrong in absence of objective moral principles and does not fear any Divine judgement.

    Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Right Or Wrong

Open Document