Persuasive Essay On Nuclear Weapons

1062 Words3 Pages

A nuclear weapon is mass destruction of both people and also things it signifies the simultaneous destruction of over ten million people. The nuclear weapon also destructs the chances of immorality by decreasing the outcome of a growing society and history.
A nuclear weapon in current society places great danger and risk on our states, even though the creating and usage for a nuclear weapon at the time was to ultimately uphold state security for the duration of the cold war, by states keeping nuclear weapon was a way of assuring security. After the cold war, the idea of having security ‘Nuclear Weapon’ decreased chances of getting threats from other states this installed confidence amongst states, nevertheless dependence on the nuclear weapon for protection is gradually becoming dangerous.
There have been different methods over …show more content…

The most satisfactory and comprehensive solution would be to replace the NPT with Nuclear Weapon Abolition convention, this is approved by 193 states, this will then make it an international crime like I stated earlier on, for any state or person to design, develop, manufacture, stockpile, transfer use or threaten to use a nuclear device or to design, adapt or use or threaten to use a nuclear device, or to design or use a missile, torpedo or another vehicle to deliver a nuclear device. Any allegation should be taken seriously and reported to the ICC Prosecutor, who would be entitled to bring an indictment at their own discretion only subjected to approval by the judges at the courts. There would be no need for the security council. Reason against the security council is that they don’t take immediate action, they couldn’t even agree to take any action to stop the Syria killings and has been disastrously irresolute in dealing with North Korea. Cutting out the security council would require amends to the ICC Treaty, which gives the court

Open Document