They would have to deal with Congress and all the pe... ... middle of paper ... ...as, the guns used for hunting. Also, gun control will not take away guns from the criminals within the United States. Criminals already disregard current guns laws, just as they would new ones because they are criminals. In addition to that, too much gun control would increase the stress already felt by police who have the inability to be everywhere all the time. When law abiding citizens are armed, it is a help to the police and the citizens that are around them.
Gun control is a huge controversy all over the United States. For the protection of all gun control should be limited allowing Americans to purchase and carry weapons. There are many reasons why it is a safe for the public if we allow society to possess weapons. People who are comfortable with guns would feel much safer in society. Non-Criminal gun owners do not have guns to kill people.
Although it seems straightforward, the US constitution leaves a sort of ‘grey area’ when speaking of concealed firearms in public, the second amendment speaks of militia related interest, not self-defense related interests. The second amendment defines the right to keep a firearm in a household, which was normal for the time; but the ever-changing world and constant threat of shootings means we should leave it to police officers to handle crime. One major argument, however, is the thought that ‘if everybody was armed, everybody would then be able to protect themselves’. Sadly, we do not live in a perfect world; we live in a world where more guns leads to more accidents. Also if everybody was armed, Criminals and under-the-radar insane people would all want to perform heinous acts against society.
There are gun control laws to try and reduce the number of violent shootings that occur. They are trying to put limits on weapons that Americans can own. The government is trying to take our guns away mainly because of people that are criminally insane. Most of the people who commit crimes don’t even have the weapons legally. If the government takes away the rights of people who are allowed to have firearms in their possession, it will most definitely cause an outrage.
Even though this amendment is hundreds of years old, any law or person challenging the rule is clearly goinf against the founding principles of the United States. The key to the proposed solution of a national law is not to leave communities vulnerable to gun violence, but to limit gun ownership to those that can be very responsible and understand the dangers that are associated with guns and what can happen in the event of misuse. The proposed solution is geared towards enabling society to be more accountable for their gun and the whereabouts of each gun. The proposed solution will also allievate most of the illegal guns being sold and aid in solving crimes that involve gun use. Also, the prososal is designed to show that with the proper knowledge and usage guns can be very beneficial in preventing crime, saving lives, and hunting for food.
Don’t change the laws, just enforce them better. Gun control is a very large and very controversial issue in our country today. Disarming civilians, though, is not the way to deal with armed criminals. The government should let us keep our rifles, shotguns, and handguns, because we have proven ourselves by means of a background check to be responsible citizens. If we ban guns, we lose our best chance at defending ourselves from criminals who get guns illegally.
So these gun control laws should be stopped. They should find other ways to deal with gun related crimes and violence. This country was founded on the people of the country owning guns to protect what they think is right. The constitution gives the people the right to bare arms and protect themselves. Any law against guns should be unconstitutional but the laws were made because it is what some people want.
In reality is should be the fathers and mothers to control their children and lock the guns away. Also, just because of one confined event, We should not take the citizens of the United States of America guns away that are being responsible about their actions with weapons such as guns. It is much tougher to buy guns with gun control laws and it takes more cash and time to get weapons from gun stores. This is why the citizens of columbine are wrong for accusing this tradegy and others like it on the theory of gun control laws. There are more deaths due to alchol, car accidents, obesity, medical malpratice , goverment and tobacco than due to guns.
The fight to ban gun control is going to be a difficult one. Gun control laws just take guns away from law-abiding citizens. There are many reasons why people want to own a gun. Don’t keep letting the government keep making it harder for us to won a gun, everyone is a lot safer when they own a gun and follow the laws. The second amendment clearly states “the right to bear arms”, don’t let the government try to change that.
Gun control should not be allowed because not only are guns needed for self-deference, many people rely on guns for survival. Many civilians refuse to stand for gun control because taking away our guns is taking away our freedom. This is also going against one of the most important amendments in the United States Constitution. The second amendment, which states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” If gun control is passed, civilians would not be able to defend themselves, and nothing is going to stop a shooter breaking into a public or private place. A plastic sign that states, “No guns beyond this point” is not only failing in stopping a shooter, but tells that person that the people inside are defenseless.