In 2015, there were 11,323 gun violence related deaths in the united states (Guns in America). Currently, there is a large controversy in America about gun control stemming from several mass shootings in places that people should feel safe. We do not agree with the liberal side of the gun control debate, which claims that citizens do not have the right to bear arms, only form a militia. Liberals believe that it is up to the government to protect its people. We agree more with the conservative side of the debate which insists that we have the right to keep and bear arms to defend ourselves. We believe banning guns from civilians will not lower the crime rate in the united states, enforcing the current laws will. We believe that all purchased
Firstly, the claims that guns contributing to higher crime rates are completely over exaggerated. Most people are spoon-fed by the mainstream media that guns contribute to higher crime rates. In fact, in large cities like Chicago it has been proven that laws like handgun bans have worsened crime rather than alleviate it. When they did this in Chicago, politicians were hoping that this would bring crime levels down (Peterson 25). In the midst of all this, everyone as soon as the politicians proclaimed it would work, was singing their praises and saying that it would, or so they thought. So did the handgun ban succeed? Not necessarily, the article A Splendid, Precarious Victory proves this point. The author Dan Peterson provides very gut wrenching statistics. It states, “in recent years, while the handgun ban was in place, the percentage committed with handguns has consistently been 70 percent or more” (Peterson 25). Clearly, this proves that the mainstream media, anti-gun groups and politicians have distorted the truth about just how hazardous gun control is. This disturbing information should be a wake up call to those who feel that gun control works. Finally, this proves that gun control is unproductive. These kinds of laws ...
Banning guns in the US will not do anything to help because it will not keep guns away from criminals. According to Richard Felman’s “We Focused On The Wrong Things” 500,000 guns are stolen annually.(Felman, 12) This means criminals will still be able to access guns even if we ban them. Gun safety laws have seemed to do nothing as shown in Washington D.C. According to the article “ Washington D.C.: A Case Study In The Failure Of Gun Control” 25 years after Washington D.C. banned firearms the murder rate is 46.4 to 100,001 which may seem low, but in Arlington, VA right on the other side of the Potomac River from D.C. the murder rate is 2.1 to 100,002 where there is no gun control laws. That may seem surprising enough, but in all the metropolitan areas in Virginia combined the murder rate is still lower than D.C. at 6.1 to 100,003.( Washington D.C.: A Case Study In The Failure Of Gun Control) These statistics show that gun control laws are doing nothing to help re...
Guns, Crime, and Freedom states that, no gun law which restricts the right of law-abiding citizens to own guns has been proven to reduce crime or homicides, not even the Brady Law and the “Clinton Crime Bill.” These two laws st...
A study from the American College of Physicians show that firearm homicides and suicides account for 95.9% of the 464,033 gun-related deaths in the United States of America between 1999 and 2013. This statistic shows the terrifying number of intentional gun-related deaths in a country with looser gun control. Also, people who possess weapons and firearms tend to be involved in violence. With America’s high gun ownership of approximately 112 guns per 100 residents, that tendency seems inevitable to most civilians. A study published in the American Journal of Public Health concludes that “legal purchase of a handgun appears to be associated with a long-lasting increased of risk of violent death” (Cummings, Grossman, Koepsell, Savarino and Thompson, 1). This study shows that being exposed to guns will eventually lead to violence. By enforcing stricter gun control and ownership, gun-related homicide and suicide rates are bound to drop. Not to mention, large homicidal acts such as mass shootings are associated with the possession and use of legal firearms. The article “How They Got Their Guns” by The New York Times illustrate that “a vast majority of guns used in 16 recent mass shootings, including two guns believed to be used in the last Orlando attack, were bought legally and with a federal background check” (Buchanan, Keller, Oppel and Victor, 1). With such
Gun laws control the types of firearms that may be purchased, designate the qualifications of those who may purchase and own a firearm, and restrict the safe storage and use of firearms. Advocates for gun control laws argue that with these laws in place the incidence of violent crimes are reduced because the prevalence of firearms is reduced or in other words fewer guns mean less crime. But this only holds some truth because the relationship between gun control and crime rates don’t effect each other immediately. A law that is put into place won’t see any effect crime rates until a few years down the road. A study taken in the 1997, found that the right-to-carry laws reduce violent crime rates. The reductions are greater in counties with proportionally higher urban populations and the laws afford relatively greater protection to minorities and women. The study also shows that criminals substitute non confrontation crimes such as burglary, auto theft, and larceny, for violent crimes such as robbery and assault (Moorhouse et al., 2006). Thirty five states now permit law abiding residents to carry a concealed weapon (Malcom and L., 2003). With concealed weapons laws in place, the probability of a criminal coming to a confrontation with an armed citizen has increased. As such, right-to-carry laws
Mass-shootings — defined by the FBI as four or more murders occurring during the same calamity, with no distinctive time period between the homicides (Serial Murder) — have stricken across the United States at the rate of about one every two weeks since 2006 (Database of Mass Shootings, 2006-2013). This abysmal statistic has rightfully triggered much debate concerning gun restraints. The theory of gun control pertains towards any efforts intended to regulate, define, or limit the possession, production, sales, and use of guns. Since its conception, the Second Amendment — guaranteeing the “right to bear arms” — has been wildly controversial. Gun control advocates suggest that confining gun ownership would reduce the number of violent gun-related crimes, suicides, and deaths; rigorous background checks and mandatory waiting periods would help to deter criminals and possible tragedies; and that assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition magazines should be banned from public use, as police officers and military personnel are the only officials who actually need them. Adversaries argue that criminals will always find a way to get their guns, consequently leaving law-abiding citizens defenseless; crimes are often prevented by the prophylactic effect of the possibility of victim gun possession; and that the Second Amendment to the Constitution protects individuals’ right to gun ownership. Gun control is a considerable system that galvanizes Americans apropos several quandaries; therefore is it vital to be conscious of the pure facts associated with gun restriction, and even more crucial to comprehend the advantages and disadvantages.
In 1968 Congress passed the Gun Control Act. This act regulates interstate commerce in firearms, making it so that you must be a licensed manufacturer, dealer, or importer. The Gun Control Act was the first attempt at restricting easy access to a firearm. In 1976 the District of Columbia City Council prohibited it’s residents from owning a handgun. Dick Anthony Heller sued the district in 2007 for denying him the right to keep his handgun in his home on Capitol Hill. In June 2008, the Supreme Court ruled the District of Columbia’s handgun ban was unconstitutional. The people of this country believe in their reserved rights, Mr. Heller’s fought for his second amendment right and won, showing the spirit of democracy. Since the Columbine High School shootings in 1999, 27 separate mass shootings have left five or more people dead each time. These randoms acts of violence have taken place in schools (Sandy Hook, Virginia Tech), the workplace (Fort Hood), movie theaters(Aurora, CO) , and even in the church (Charleston, S.C.). Everyday seems to bring new tragedy involving guns, but is it the gun that is killing people or the operator? As with anything, there are pro and cons to the right of own a firearm. With a firearm in your possession, you can protect yourself and your family from just about any threat. Having a gun gives you power over your own life, but this power also extends over someone else life
The sociological aspect of the gun control debate deals largely with statistical information, and is often used by gun control advocates for their debates. It doesn’t take a fool to see a positive correlation between position of firearms and death caused by firearms regardless of the intent of each death (murder or mishandling of firearms). According to researches done by the Harvard School of Public Health, statistically speaking, owning a gun is more likely to kill you than to defend you [1] in your home. In addition, our current screening system for gun purchase applications does very little to help keep the death tolls down. In the past few years mass shooting has become a frequent topic on the news, in fact, the number of mass shootings has dramatically increased from 5 per year in 2000, to 13 per year in 2013. And a majority of these shooters has obtaine...
In addition to the laws passed above, there was a big case in 1976 in which Washington D.C. passed a total ban on handgun ownership. This law went uncontested for quite some time until Robert A. Levy brought up suit against Washington D.C. It was 2003 when the case was first brought up and took 5 years to get in to the Supreme Court. So writing for the majority in D.C. v. Heller, Justice Scalia acknowledged the problem that gun violence poses in American cities, but declared that D.C.’s ban on handgun ownership was unconstitutional.