Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia

Diseases are all over the world and large amount of them cause death, or Scientists did not find a perfect treatment yet. However, some of the people who have hopeless cases like Clinical death refuge to another solution if they could not find a cure. Euthanasia, or mercy death, “ is the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering.” This subject makes a huge public controversy all over the world. Some people believe that it violates the humanity, medical ethics, and law while the other argue that. On the one hand, many people think that everyone has the right to choose their life, and choose to die is one of it. Euthanasia is the best solution to end the pain, and there is no humanity violation

If there is no hope and no cure to the ill, mercy killing is the last solution to release the pain. Moreover, doctors know the best for their patients, and euthanasia is one kind of medical treatments. However, other believe that take care of a patient is the doctor job not killing them. Euthanasia is a violation of one of the most important fundamental medical ethics in the words of the International Code of Medical Ethics, which is: "A physician shall always bear in mind the obligation to respect human life." There are a lot of alternative treatments and drugs to reveal the pain for the patient, so killing is not the only solution. According to what it has been stated by the World Health Organization, “palliative care affirms life and regards dying as a normal process; it neither hastens nor postpones death; it provides relief from pain and suffering; it integrates the psychological and spiritual aspects of the patient.” People would think that their doctor prefers to just kill them rather than take the responsibility and treat

In some country such as Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Albania and in the US states of Washington, Oregon, Vermont, New Mexico and Montana it is legal to end patient pain by mercy killing. It is not killing if you want to release someone from their suffering. This decision made by the doctor, and he/she know the patient condition. If there is any hope, the doctor would not made like this decision. There is no broken rules or violation, so there is no need to prohibit the euthanasia. On contrast, killing someone is murder even if their health condition was hopeless. They are still breathing, and take their life is a crime. What the difference between killing someone on the street or on the bed?. It is quite the same, therefore; it should be prohibited on all over the world. In Washington v. Glucksberg, the US Supreme Court declared that,"The history of the law 's treatment of assisted suicide in this country has been and continues to be one of the rejection of nearly all efforts to permit it. That being the case, our decisions lead us to conclude that the asserted 'right ' to assistance in committing suicide is not a fundamental liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause. "