Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia

Needless suffering will continue in the US if the laws are not changed to reflect the current changes in medical care. The first argument for euthanasia is that commit suicide should be legal in general because there are people who’s being treated for so long and there’s nothing that could heal them to live longer. Why shouldn’t they allow the patients to choose their lives? So in order for them not to suffer they should have the permission from a doctor to commit suicide. It’s painful for those who wants to end their lives, but it’s more painful if

Mrs. Maynard was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer earlier in the year and was told her life span was getting smaller. Rather than waiting for the inevitable suffering, she moved to Oregon, where euthanasia is legal, to purchase the necessary barbiturates and ended her life. Before her death, Mrs. Maynard wrote on the CNN website and stated that, “I would not tell anyone else that he or she should choose death with dignity. My question is: Who has the right to tell me that I don’t deserve this choice?” (2014). This kind of thinking triggers the moral argument for voluntary active euthanasia, meaning the patient is terminally ill and no longer has any chance of recovering, resulting in their decision to die on their own terms.

Many people see death is a bad thing. People don’t like it and they don’t want to hear about it. For many seriously ill and vegetative patients, death is a good thing for them. Death will end their suffering from pains and they can also die with dignity. Euthanasia traditionally means a “good death.” The term has traditionally been used to refer to the hastening of a suffering person’s death or “mercy killing.” The legalization of euthanasia is important for the patient because it would give dying people a choice to determine if they want to fight the disease or end their suffering.

There are many different reasons why people would want to euthanize someone, but here are just a few of them. The reasons are – to put themselves out of the misery of their terminal illness, as they only see physical and emotional pain in their future because some rules are better than none, human beings have the right to die how and when they want to because sometimes a life is just not worth living anymore and euthanasia may be necessary for the fair distribution of health resources. One acting on their own violation, with their right mind should be able to make a decision on how they live and die without a government or religious group interfere. Euthanasia should be

Dr. Quill did the right thing in giving Diane the sleeping pills, in a situation like hers, having control seems like such an important thing. And a sense of happiness in an otherwise very depressing stage of life is essential for the patient and the family members. A doctor stop treatment at the request of the patient because he knows that the treatment is not working so why prolong the suffering of the patient and the family members, why if it’s acceptable for a doctor to stop treatment knowing that the patient will die, it’s not acceptable for him to give the patient pills that will give the patient a sense of control and have a more peaceful death. No doctor wants to see a patient of theirs die, but no human being can stand seeing a person suffering knowing that they can easily stop the suffering and pain.

Euthanasia is defined as “the act of putting to death painlessly or allowing to die, as by withholding extreme medical measures, a person or animal suffering from an incurable, especially a painful, disease or condition, painless death.” (Dictionary.com) Euthanasia should be seen as an option that allows patients to make the decision of how they want to spend the rest of their life. People have a right to make the decision of using euthanasia to end their life because it is their choice to live or go through life with discomfort. The value of life is very important and should not be tampered with or taken for granted. When making the decision to use euthanasia, it should be a conclusive decision. Euthanasia should be seen as an option for patients

In Oregon, she planned to get new physicians and after attending appointments, she could be prescribed a lethal pill that would end her life. She wanted to live her last six months happily, and she didn’t want to suffer and have her family watch her suffer. (Death) She wanted to be able to end her life on her own terms, and not when the cancer says that she had to. She received a lot of unkind criticism for her choice. Death with Dignity Act, or the use of assisted suicide is morally justifiable, especially in Brittany Maynard’s

They already know that they are going to die soon. Patients who do suffer with these diseases and are physically unable to kill themselves and die painfully, and unhappily. Patients and family members, that decide committing suicide is for the best, it is because they can not bear to see their own family member go through anymore pain. Yet if the person is too ill to instruct what is to be done, it should be left up to the immediate family. Abortion on the other hand is a sometimes a solution for accidental pregnancies.

Considering the next criteria to the rule, the negative effect of aborting the fetus cannot be avoided. If the woman wants to survive and cure her disease, the only way that she can accomplish this is to abort the fetus. Lastly, the negative effect is lesser than the positive effect. Although aborting the fetus sounds harsh, the baby will not survive in either case. If the young woman who is pregnant does not take the medication to cure her disease, she will die, resulting in the death of the baby as well.

It is my belief that assisted suicide and euthanasia (both passive and active) is morally ok. My main reason for thinking so stems from the idea that people should be allowed to make choices about their own life when it doesn’t affect anyone else. To me, dying is a very personal, one-sided ordeal that doesn’t involve other people as much as they think it does. People like to make themselves apart of other people’s deaths and to me that seems very selfish. Sure you have to deal with losing this person, but people become so focused on what they are losing and completely ignore the fact that the person dying is dealing with what is considered the biggest mystery on Earth. When someone decides that their life is no longer worth living, we shouldn’t come at them with guilt and anger.