Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
important information on the second amendment of the us constitution to include ina a essay
gun control increases crime rates
gun control can reduce crime essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: important information on the second amendment of the us constitution to include ina a essay
Gun control has been a hot topic for very long time. People on the anti-
gun control side believe that gun ownership is a Constitutional right backed by
the Second Amendment. The anti-gun believe that you should be able to posses
and own any firearm. They also believe that gun laws only restrict the law
abiding citizens. Pro-gun control believe that guns are the backbone to our
crime problem. They also believe that gun laws help keep guns of the street and
deter crime.
The Second Amendment reads," A well regulated Militia, being necessary to
the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms,
shall not be infringed" (Caplan p32). "Underlying this amendment are two goals
of an individual and collective defense from violence and aggression, which have
been recognized by Congress" ( Caplan P.32). The second amendment should help
secure right of the people to have a gun in their home. " The government should
not be permitted to declare who would or would not be able to bear arms on the
basis of vague religious tests or any other nebulous standard or artifice" (
Caplan p.39).
The first infringement on the Second Amendment came on November 30, 1993
when President Clinton signed Brady Bill I. The law required that there be a
five day waiting period on all hand gun purchases. The Brady Bill also banned
semi-automatic rifles and other military type weapons. ( Moore 1994 p.434) The
five day waiting period is suppose to stop felons from buying guns. But,
Waiting periods do not stop felons from getting guns. Since 1968 it has been
illegal for a felon to possess any firearm. ( Moore 1994 p 440) Most of the
criminals do not get their guns from stores, most get them by theft or on the
black market. " While legitimate users of firearms encounter intense regulation,
surutiny, and bureaucratic control, illicit markets easily adapt to whatever
difficulties a free society throws in their way" (Polsby p.1). A study by
Professor James D. Wright and Peter H. Rossi, showed that, fifty percent of
criminals expected to get a gun illeagily the same day they get out of prison.
(Blackman A ug 1985)
Brady Bill talks about recording and keeping track of guns for safety
reasons. When people talk about the militia many people believe that the
National Guard is our guarantee for a free state.(Caplan p. 50) People need to
realize that the President is Commander-in-Chief of the National Guard, and may
federalize it any time" ( Caplan p.
Martin Luther King and Malcolm x are both strong representations of two different approaches to a common goal. Martin Luther King Jr. preferred a nonviolence approach to the situation. Whereas, Malcolm X handled racism in a violent approach. However, both man believed African Americans deserved their human rights and equal say. Martin Luther King Jr. believed in an integrated society while Malcolm X wanted African Americans to have their segregated neighborhoods just as good as the whites.
Martin Luther King jr. and Malcolm X are still highly controversial African-American leaders. Martin, a Christian integrationist, and Malcolm, a Muslim nationalist have been a powerful force against racial injustice. Each man sacrificed his life for the freedom of his people; however, Martin and Malcolm had taken very different approaches in achieving equality and identity for African-Americans in the land of their birth.
African Americans are fortunate to have leaders who fought for a difference in Black America. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X are two powerful men in particular who brought hope to blacks in the United States. Both preached the same message about Blacks having power and strength in the midst of all the hatred that surrounded them. Even though they shared the same dream of equality for their people, the tactics they implied to make these dreams a reality were very different. The background, environment and philosophy of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X were largely responsible for the distinctly varying responses to American racism.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two of the most prominent leaders and orators at the heart of the Civil Rights Movement. Although both leaders possessed the same objectives, their outlooks and perspectives differed immensely.
Malcolm X always believed that in order to conquer their rightful place in society, the There are many differences between Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X believed that only through force could blacks conquer their rightful place in society. He blamed many of the conditions that blacks in the United States lived in on the whites. Martin Luther King appeared calm and idealistic. Martin insisted blacks to earn their just place in society by attaining a sense of worth, high ethical standards, diligence and leadership, using non-violence as their impartial weapon. He addressed that in God’s sight, people of all races are equals and there is no such thing as a superior or inferior
Malcolm X’s speech had a very strong tone, while Martin Luther King Jr’s was more calm and pacific. Both of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X’s thoughts and feelings about segregation and how to eradicate it were well expressed and understandable.
history with a right to bear arms. Finally one can see the conflict of views
...ocent, honest people who now need guns to protect themselves from the illegal guns in the hands of a criminal. The Justice Department conducted a survey of inmates in 1997 and it showed that “80% had obtained guns from family, friends, or an illegal source” (Gold, 112).
United States. Committee on the Judiciary . Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Washington: GPO, 1982. Web. 30 Nov. 2015.
Malcolm X or Malcolm Little and also known as “El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz”, was an African-American Muslim minister and a human rights activist. He had a hard child a young adult life. His admirers he was a courageous speaking for the rights of blacks, a man who accuses white America in the meanest terms for their crimes against black Americans; critics accused him of preaching racism and violence. “He has been called one of the greatest and most influential African Americans in history along with martin luther king jr.” based on some of the things malcolm has done, Martin luther king jr. definitely had a different way of approaching issues. with both of their totally different way of getting their point across, discussion could be made on who was more effective in the civil rights movement as a whole. If Malcolm x wasn't around and fighting for civil right around the same time as MLK was doing it here he probably would of had much of a chance and would have just been killed, he in a way motivated the whole world into fighting for civil rights in their country, without his “black power” philosophy. he was easily in the top five people that got the civil right movement to follows it course and end up get equality for black and white.
In history we know that no two men are alike but, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were phenomenal people and leaders. Both had visualized some type of change in the future, yet were not literally able to see it. Both Dr. King and Malcolm X set out to bring a sense of confidence to blacks all over the United States. Their main purpose was to help instill black’s power and strength so that they could overcome racial disparity and prejudice that surrounded them, but both of them had very unique and distinct different ways of promoting their message. Martin was more geared and focused on equality and wellness of the world as a whole, a Malcolm X’s personal interpretation of the world was very well blinded by anger, bitterness, and the desire to get revenge at the expense of the world that he thought treated him unfairly.
Malcolm X was a freedom fighter like Dr. King who fought for the right and freedoms for black Americans. Unlike Malcolm, Dr. King called black Americans blacks while Malcolm called them Negros. Malcolm used violence in his fight for freedom when he said, “Revolution was based upon bloodshed”. Malcolm was ready for anything as far as blacks will gain the respect and freedom they needed. In Malcolm’s black revolution, he made it clear how blacks were treated differently no matter their age, what school they came out of, no matter what their intellectual or professional level was, they were still recognized as a boy and were not given the respect they deserved. He also pointed out how whites made them think they had different goals and objectives.
Video games have been a rapidly expanding industry since their inception in the 1970s. Along with their growth have come concerns about violent video games and their effects on aggression and violence in young people. The endless numbers of school shootings have pushed this issue to the forefront. These events brought about the question: do violent video games induce aggression in youth? That’s the question I set out to answer by looking at research. The research shows that there is a link between playing video games and increases in aggression in adolescents. What implications does this fact have ethically? It means that video game producers and distributors need to be held responsible for their releases and the way they end up in the hands of kids.
Although violent video games are thought to encourage real world violence, they actually help to prevent it. I am focusing on violent video games and how they affect juveniles because I feel that this issue needs to be looked at in the criminal justice community. It is an unnecessary distraction to blame the actions of a disturbed youth on a form of entertainment that has been used by millions of people without incident. A review article published in The Psychiatric Quarterly found that many studies which claim to indicate an increase in aggression due to video games are, in fact, biased! Once the bias is taken into account, the studies no longer find any correlation between youths who play violent video games and youths who demonstate aggression and violent behavior. (Ferguson, 2014)
I believe that there are two clear messages in this novel. The first has been explained in the above paragraph however I will emphasise it slightly. If a society divides it will become dangerous. Throughout history this has been proven. Although I say Robert Swindells has warned us of a terrible future have we not already segregated in the past? Take South Africa for example. 50 years ago they were under apartheid (separating). The Black men were not allowed to enter the white mans land unless he had a visa. They were deprived of their citizenship. Robert Swindells has taken great lengths to remind and warn us that we cannot ever redo the mistakes set in the pas...