Personalty Assessment: Assessment And Influence On The Assessment Of Personality

1995 Words4 Pages

Assessment of Personality This paper introduces the overview of personality assessment approaches in use currently in society. It proceeds to review the big five personality measures, its validity in prediction of personality types (Archer & Smith, 2011). Aspects on the social desirability trait and the distortion produced in responses to evaluation questionnaires, being a significant part of the problems in personality assessment is examined. Personality constructs have been demonstrated to be useful for explaining and predicting attitudes, behaviors, performance, and outcomes in organizational settings (Ones, Dilchert, Viswesvaran, & Judge, 2007). Social desirability does not have an influence on the validity of personality assessments. …show more content…

Personality tests and skills assessments provide valuable information for certain well-defined positions, such as seller, buyer and worker in routine production. The interviews to study the person, carried out by experts are also useful when simpler methods do not clearly show certain characteristics such as emotional stability. Psychological tests on knowledge have limited success. The diversity of requirements for them, coupled with the complexity of motivations and behavior of individuals, make the structuring of proof extremely difficult. Psychological tests and interviews implemented for personality assessment act as a supplement to other administrative criteria. When it comes to executive positions, the main value of the evidence lies in corroboration or uncertainty about personal qualifications. The qualifications of persons based on experience are an important administrative requirement (Archer & Smith, …show more content…

The development of knowledge about the candidates is a complex process of assessment no particular technique is able to reveal the essence of knowledge of the subject, so it is necessary to go for a multi-layered design, multi-technical approach (Harwood, 2012). Millon model has been greatly enriched over the last three decades, which in turn implies greater complexity that goes against simple explanations. Surely, such complexity is related to the object of study: personality. Future work on personality assessment throws up the need for validation of the use of different means of evaluation of candidates applying for a selection process (Aiken & Groth-Marnat, 2006). It would be very useful to measure the real scope and potential of using different procedures in the selection of personnel. Focus is needed to investigate the reliability and validity of combined procedures interviews, tests (aptitude and personality) and knowledge

Open Document