Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of civil liberties
The importance of civil liberties
The importance of civil liberties
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of civil liberties
I have not taken a civics, government, or social studies class since I was in High School, back in 1992-1996. I can honestly tell you that I was not interested in those types of classes, even though I did well in them! This class, however, was different. I am not sure if it was because I am older or if the book and other martials were more effective, but I feel that I have learned a great deal about our government from this course.
I have learned a lot about how our government works, but most importantly why the government was set up the way it is. I enjoyed the textbook, Keeping the Republic, by Christine Barbour. My co-workers and I would go through the book just to look at all of the graphs, Snapshot of America and the Big Picture parts in the book. We all found it fascinating! By having them sprinkled throughout the book, it gave a nice visual to help understand the data and broaden our understanding of how the government works.
…show more content…
I liked that the discussions were more of a “discussion” and not just another assignment. I felt that they were more opinionated and I really enjoyed that. I liked reading what everybody else’s opinions were and how they felt about certain issues. I felt that was not alone in how I feel about how the government is being run or just about the government in general. With the weekly quiz assignments, I appreciated how quickly you got back to me and all the additional information you gave. I felt that you took the time and effort to read and then to respond, not just pass a grade. Truth be told, it was actually
The Radical and the Republican by James Oakes is an enlightening book about Fredrick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln, their different approaches, and united goal. Oakes reveals how dissimilar Douglass and Lincoln were in their views and actions, but the author also tells how both of these men influenced each other and evolved into radical Republicans in order to accomplish the abolition of slavery. Oaks clearly and soundly argues that both Lincoln became more radical and Douglass became more political in order to accomplish the complete abolition of slavery. The transformation in their way of thinking, conduct, and actions clearly show how Lincoln and Douglass became radical Republicans in the end.
My fellow countrymen, I stand before you today in order to defend the necessity of small republics for democracy and liberty. Let us begin with Montesquieu’s simple thesis: Large republics are incapable of self-government because of the massive and inevitable diversity of their populations and of the interests of that population (153). This leads to a corruption of the principles of democracy and ends liberty. Using Montesquieu’s elegantly argued The Spirit of Laws as a framework to discuss and reflect upon the principles of a democratic republic and the necessity of a small republic, I hope to articulate herein the reasons you should come to see this most brilliant insight, honorable gentlemen.
Another point was Thomas Paine the author. It covers in great detail what kind of person he was and covered information from his parents and his childhood, all the way to his death. I think Slaughter painted that graphic picture of him which allowed us to get to know Thomas Paine. I think that it sheds a whole new light on what he did and just how much we owe him for our freedom. I know the book really helped me see that because prior to this class, I was not aware of the magnitude Common Sense and The American Crisis had on the people of America back then.
According to the article “A Review of Healing the Heart of Democracy: The Courage to Create a Politics Worthy of the Human Spirit” written by Brace L. Mallory, Parker J. Palmer's teachings and writings are the primary understanding of the connection between education and knowledge, heart and mind, and individual and expert. He describes Palmer as the same one who invokes the spirit, words, and challenges of political leaders. Also, Mallory discusses Palmer’s book titled “Healing the Heart of Democracy” that it is an important document that shows the tensions among and capacities created by the private domain, political systems, and the public platform. Besides, Mallory talks about Palmer’s concern about the general passive pedagogies found
The hallmarks of freedom can stay a part of our democracy if the state governments don’t pass any laws that fully take away or excessively restrict rights granted by the Bill of Rights and if the people find alternative ways to exercise their rights without breaking any laws established by the federal government, specifically the Supreme Court and Congress. In “We the People: An Introduction to American Government” by Thomas Patterson, it is stated that “…individuals do not have the right to hold a public rally at a busy intersection… or the right to turn up the volume on loudspeakers …where they can be heard miles away.” (p.102). This law only takes away one specific situation where people can protest, but the people can still find other ways
I had thought that we could have been more specific on many of them, although our justifications were very well written. We did not accomplish exactly what we wanted for the military and boundaries one, but they did have offers that supported our reasons and justifications. As for our money resolution, much of it was accomplished, and we had added a few other points to it, too. I thought our team had done very well on achieving peace for the nations, but we could have tried to achieve fewer arguments by being specific with our thoughts and being more open to new ideas proposed by other countries. Our team had collaborated together very well and were somewhat efficient compared to the other groups I have worked with. Although, because I had written the money resolution, the introduction, and had helped my teammates write, I had thought that I did much more than my
Our Founding Fathers wanted a republic not a democracy. A republic can be defined as rules or laws that govern the people. Democracy can be defined as majority rule, which is why it’s known as mob rule. Democracy could be described as two wolves and a sheep voting on what to eat. This is the reason states have two senators per state - to protect small populated states from being trampled by large populated states. Our founding fathers did not agree on a lot of things, but the one thing they did agree on is that a republic would surmount the forces of tyranny.
The subject matter of the “Republic” is the nature of justice and its relation to human existence. Book I of the “republic” contains a critical examination of the nature and virtue of justice. Socrates engages in a dialectic with Thrasymachus, Polemarchus, and Cephalus, a method which leads to the asking and answering of questions which directs to a logical refutation and thus leading to a convincing argument of the true nature of justice. And that is the main function of Book I, to clear the ground of mistaken or inadequate accounts of justice in order to make room for the new theory. Socrates attempts to show that certain beliefs and attitudes of justice and its nature are inadequate or inconsistent, and present a way in which those views about justice are to be overcome.
Between political philosophy and ideology, comparative politics, and public policy, I can say that I feel I have the most basic understanding of politics. The title The Challenge of Politics: An Introduction to Political Science, says it all; politics is a challenge to fully grasp, but this text and this class has given me a solid foundation of knowledge from with I can base my future decisions on. No matter my future career path, this class taught me valuable information. Just in general it is important as a citizen to understand how our government works. In addition, it helped me form a well-educated idea on what type of government I want to elect into power. Furthermore, the text was full of basic political science material; thus, giving me a good overview of the things I will continue to learn in political science classes. The text was well written with great additional graphs, pictures, and resources between the covers. Although there were a few things that could be improved upon, I think that this text is worth using for the future classes of POLS
Most normal individuals in the modern world would assume that all books written, not published, by man are based on either a portion of the author’s imagination, an event (biased or non-biased) in either history or during the life of the author, a straight-out autobiography, or a generalized biography of another person they once knew. However, this philosophical novel fits none of the descriptions above. The book is actually an in-depth recording of a philosophy contest between Plato’s teacher Socrates and several other great philosophers. What is significant about this contest is that, in it, Socrates describes his personal view of a “perfect world,” and why justice is so important in the process of creating a civilized world.The novel was completed in 370 B.C., and it describes a strong debate between Socrates and five other speakers.
We live in a republic governed not just by majority rule but also by law. We use law in our country to limit the power of majority rule. The basic reason that we do this is because society can be flawed. This "flaw" can come from a variety of areas, but the one that I would like to focus on is sexism. In criminal law the courts are blind to the ideas that people are different. Every person is given the same privileges and limitations as the next person regardless of sex or race. We do not live in a system were there is a set of rules for men and a different set of rules for women. The application of these laws can be flawed however, because the means in which law is applied is done through human eyes. In theory law should protect every person in the same way, but the application of our laws falls short of this ideal.
Socrates was a renowned philosopher in the ancient Grecian times. His peak was around the Peloponnesian War, when the Spartans defeated the Athenians and ended the Golden Age. The reason Socrates is one of histories most famous philosophers is largely due to Plato's writings. Two of Plato's famous works include The Apology and The Republic, both written about Socrates' views about the so called "wise philosophers" of his time. The two works hold unique views about government, as well as opening the eyes of the Grecian people to the world as they knew it.
The feedback that I was provided by Cayla helped me tremendously because previously I lacked confidence in my writing because I had no clue if anyone else shared the same view as I. She expressed that she has similar views and told me to further extend my ideas. Admittedly I was afraid of being judged for having this sort of view but she helped me realize that I am not alone in believing this, and most importantly to not limit my writing based off of my fear of being judged by my peers. If I were to grade this assignment, I would give myself a middle B because I feel that I improved tremendously in terms of concreting my values across to the reader. By writing this paper, I seriously feel like i'm more knowledgeable about some of my values
First and foremost, this course is one of the best courses I have taken here at Wilmington University. I have learned about 80% from this course, compare to what I knew before. This course has incredibly added to my knowledge about public policy in the United States. I have learned the importance of publicly policy in America and the intricacies of who and what influence public policies in America.
Our Founding fathers hoped for a dream where any man could come to this country and