On the other hand, the article written by Weinreb uses ad hominem to do the same thing as Greenberg, but in this article, Jim Harbaugh Can 't Stop, But He Probably Should, Weinreb calls out Jim Harbaugh for his crazy tactics. Weinreb uses this article to describe Harbaugh as “batshit” and a “freak” for his recruiting actions. What Weinreb is trying to do is make the reader question whether Coach Harbaugh is sane or not by ethos. He makes the reader look back at all the things he has done, trying to get potential athletes to come play for him, and question whether the coach is doing the right
Williams’ views on style are more diverse. According to him, style should be more about the audience the writer is writing to rather than the writer himself. Williams explains how to write or the reader. In his last chapter Williams states how to write in a constructive voice, how to the flow of information affects the reader, what words to use when the reader has prior knowledge of the subject and when he or she does not, and how to be clear for the reader.
Even to this semester, I only read this book following teacher’s advice and didn’t do some extra reading. The output is up to the input. Only when we read more and gain more, can we express ourselves more casually and write more good articles.
In the Introduction to "They Say / I Say": The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein provide templates, that were created from fundamental writing moves, that writers usually pick up along the way without realizing it. Those moves are so common that the authors turned them into templates in their book. The authors consider the main template “They Say / I Say” to be the foundation for all successful dialogue. Specifically, Graff and Birkenstein argue that the types of writing templates they offer help less experienced writers, as well as accomplished writers guidance and direction, to structure and generate their own writing. As the authors themselves put it “One of our key premises is that these basic moves are so common that they can be represented in templates that you can use right away to structure and even generate your own writing.” In other words, the authors offer a simplified tool to create writing on an academic level.
After graduating high school in 1917, he decided not to attend college, even after his father’s urging. Instead, he went to report for the Kansas City Star, where his editor told him to “ ‘Use short sentences. Use short first paragraphs. Use vigorous English’ ” ( qtd. in Harmon 2). This shaped his unique and simple writing style that stayed with him for the rest of his life (Harmon 2).
What is the definition of style? Is there an exact way of interpreting style individuals create in their writing? What is the importance and function of style in the writing process? Does style really matter? Before encountering books such as William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White’s “The Elements of Style” and Joesph M. Williams “Style Toward Clarity and Grace” I had not put much thought into these questions. My main focus was to get my writing assignments completed, turned in, and out of my mind. However, these two books create a whole new outlook on the world of writing for any individual who can open the cover and their mind.
“Style is how you write, and you write well when you are interested. A writer’s own interest in the story is the essential thing. If there is a flash of warmth in him it is repeated in the reader. The emotion is bigger than style.
So far this year, I felt pretty satisfied with my progress this semester. I feel like I am slowly adapting to the new way papers and assignments are handled. All my college work depends solely on me now. No one is going to baby me anymore and whether I succeed or fail depends on how much effort I put into something. For the first time in my life I wrote a paper. Not just a five paragraph essay but actual pages, which is extremely challenging. It’s also been my first time studying for five hours straight so I can pass an actual test. I didn’t know I possessed this level of dedication, it’s probably because it isn’t free.
To be quite honest, I throughly enjoyed the article so much that I found myself rereading it and sharing it with other intellectuals; and those intellectuals also found the article to be catchy and stimulating. It was interesting to analyze and understand that my style of writing is similar to that of Thomas Osborne’s. Also, through my analyzation of the article I found the truth behind the emotional process writers go thru during their creative process. Overall, it was a pleasure to read the article and I will be looking up more pieces written by Thomas Osborne because clearly something can be learned from the way the man expresses words on a
My columnist, Catherine Rampell, writes with clear and distinguishable voice. This voice carries her pieces, giving each one the same qualities that define her writing. Regardless of topic, Rampell crafts her pieces with the same components: short intros, a witty voice, and direct quotations scattered in to add evidence and credibility. Through thorough examination of Rampell’s works, I found her writing to be very formulaic (though I’m sure this is true of a myriad of other columnists, especially considering the pressures on the industry.) Once I discovered her formula, my imitation began to write itself.
Personally, I cannot identify my exact writing style. I do write with clear, concise, fluidity; however, I have no sense of “personal style.” I construct each written assignment with the intention of being blunt and supporting my assertions with facts and details that will strengthen my argument. After reading Ch. 1 “The Transaction” I agree with that Zinsser proposes: my writing reflects who I am as a person (5). I am blunt and to the point. I get tasks done in the most efficient way. Maybe my personality does come through in my writing more than I thought.
“How to Read Like a Writer” is an article written by Mike Bunn; after reading the entire texts, I found this article was pretty interesting. As before, to my way of thinking, it would be boring and confused because I was not sure how the author will describe this kind of academic idea; however, I changed my mind after reading the first paragraph. Bunn used an interesting way to start this “formal article”- to introduce himself not just the serious explanation of “RLW” or other things; this fancy way made me meet with him as real and listen to him personally even across the paper. As reading continues, Bunn used plant of evidence to improve how to be a better reader as well as a better writer. Numerous new thoughts about the ways to read are
Harris, Robert A. Writing with Clarity and Style: A Guide to Rhetorical Devices for Contemporary Writers. Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak Pub., 2003. Print.
In order to produce a piece of well-rounded writing, it is a known fact that every author must be able to assemble, grease, and apply the many moving pieces of literacy throughout his work. These tasks, while being vital, do not at all necessitate that a particular technique or procedure be followed for their completion. Thankfully, writers are free to use their own methods to invent, revise, and discover. Speaking for myself, I certainly have my own writing method.
I am not the kind of person who talks or writes much. Putting my thoughts on papers is something I have always struggled with doing. I believe this class will help me improve on transferring my thoughts to paper, in an organized fashion. I look forward to becoming a better writer because of this class.