Police Officer Melin And Sullivan For The Act Of Perjury

529 Words2 Pages

Identify all the options. The options is whether or not to terminate police officer Melin and Sullivan for the act of perjury in the case of Mr. Francis. 2. Identify all those affected by the decision. Consider individuals and organizations as well as the community. Those directly affected by the decision of perjury would definitely be Melin, Sullivan, Francis, the police department, and the community of New York. 3. Describe the harms and benefits for all those affected under Option 1, then Option 2, and so on. Option 1: Terminate Melin and Sullivan for perjury. Melin: He will lose a source of income, will gain a bad reputation as a “bad apple” police officer, and will receive no retirement benefits. Sullivan: The same case for Officer Sullivan he will lose a source of income , will gain a bad reputation as a “bad apple” police officer, and will receive no retirement benefits. …show more content…

Police Department: This will help the Police department maintain a clean image in the eyes of the community. Especially, since New York police department has a reputation of systemic corruption in the past. It will also can be used as general deterrence against other police officers working in the department to avoid committing perjury, because the policy will be executed swiftly. New York Community: The community of New York will feel more safe and will put more trust in the police department when it comes to giving testimony and handling justice with integrity. Option 2: Allow Melin and Sullivan to keep their

Open Document