Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pedagogy of the oppressed chapter 2
impotrance of attitude in learning process
What does Pedagogy of Oppressed say about the dynamics of education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pedagogy of the oppressed chapter 2
I remember walking into my first day of kindergarten thinking I was the most intelligent student there, but my teacher despised me. I felt stupid thinking I knew nothing just because my teacher believed I knew nothing and Pablo Freire would probably agree with her tactics. Pablo Freire is an influential educator that would spend most of his time in the impoverished communities of Brazil aiding other educators and devolving new methods of teaching for students and adults so they can be capable of thinking critically and focusing on new challenges. Freire wants to modify the education system as it is not an objective process and that teaching is anything but simple as he explains in his essay, “Pedagogy of The Oppressed” (214).
Freire has had
…show more content…
He goes on to introduce the banking concept, an idea where the students are banks and the teachers are depositors. “Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor. Instead of communicating, the teacher issues communiques and makes deposits which the students patiently receive, memorize, and repeat. This is the "banking ' concept of education.” (Freire) Banking can lead to the system becoming oppressed from a certain viewpoint. Teachers are being seen as the dominant, controlling the students and what is being given to them as information whereas the students are expected to be submissive and meek. This impedes the student’s ability to reason critically. It also leads to a lack of creativity and student’s worldly perspective will be limited to what is force fed to them by the teachers. Students should be allowed to think on their own and create their own beliefs and be able to converse with the teacher, leaving room open for debate and the exchange of ideas. Now days, students do not challenge themselves because of this concept, they are expected so little of them when it only comes to …show more content…
Problem posing promotes cooperation and communication between teachers and students. “The problem-posing method does not dichotomize the activity of teacher-student: she is not "cognitive" at one point and "narrative" at another. She is always "cognitive," whether preparing a project or engaging in dialogue with the students. He does not regard objects as his private property, but as the object of reflection by himself and his students. In this way, the problem-posing educator constantly re-forms his reflections in the reflection of the students.” (Freire) The teacher, being the opposite of narrative, can provoke dialogue between teacher and students, which can result in debate, curiosity and new challenges, that help them think disparagingly. Students can embrace their creativity and have an open outlook based on their own understanding of things, not what is given to them. Although, Freire makes suitable ideas from problem posing, how can one view their teacher as an equal? This could lead students simply not caring what the teacher has to offer. There needs to be some authoritative stance with the students. Freire’s argument supports that the problem posing method is the only needed concept in order for reform to occur and to completely rejecting the banking concept
Paulo Friere’s essay “The ‘Banking’ concept of education” is a short passage from his book "Pedagogy of the Oppressed" that explains the two primary types of education that exist according to Friere. Friere describes the two types of educating as the banking concept, which is briefly described as the transfer of the knowledgeable teacher, to the ignorant student "Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor." (Friere 1), and the problem-poser, which he describes as two way communication in which the students and teacher both teach and learn from one another "Through dialogue, the teacher-of-the-students and the students-of-the-teacher cease to exist and a new term emerges: teacher-student with
In Chapter 2, “The ‘Banking Concept of Education,” from the book Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1989), Paulo Freire criticizes the education system, comparing it to a “banking concept.” The author also points out the system is broken and needs to be overhauled.
Oppression is a term which has been used all around the world for many years, but not everyone knows what it actually stands for which is the inequality between people giving off two famous terms known as the oppressed and the oppressor. Regardless of this, for the same amount of time, people have been dealing with oppressors in a wide variety of situations both in the public and private life. In the book The Pedagogy Of The Oppressed by Paulo Freire, Freire discusses the relationship between the oppressed and the oppressors. He noted that society scares the freedom out of the poor and powerless. According to Freire, freedom is the outcome of the informed action, which he referred to as the praxis. Oppression can be seen in the limit rights some women have around the world.
One teacher may adopt the banking concept while the other may utilize the problem-posing concept. However, while problem-posing education generates creativity by giving students the ability to communicate, banking education does not. Freire asserts that in the “banking” concept of education, “the teacher chooses the program content, and the students (who were not consulted) adapt to it” (217). Freire indicates that students, who are victims of banking education, have no control over how an instructor chooses to teach. Therefore, creativity is destroyed by the fact that it was not even permitted in the first place. Students are not able to express their opinions or solve problems using their own methods because in order to pass the class, students not only need to adapt to the teaching style of their professors but think like them too. Freire’s quote relates to experiences I have had with “banking” teachers throughout my twelve years of formal education. Those teachers only taught using textbooks, therefore, they insisted that the textbook was always right. If I were to solve a math problem using a technique different from the book, then I would not get points for the problem even though my answer was right. And if I were to interpret an open-ended essay different from how my teacher would then my interpretations would be wrong. By doing this, my teachers destroyed my creativity. I was prohibited from my own thoughts and penalized if I expressed them. The only alternative for me was to become a “robot” that followed the orders of authorities, but being a “robot” was not something I was ashamed of. In fact, my role as a “robot” led me to better understand the “drama of Education” in which teachers attempt to “regulate the way the world ‘enters into’ the students”. I was able to figure out that my own teachers had tried to handle the way the world “entered into me” by
In today’s society, schools in wealthy communities are better than those in poor communities, higher income schools are simply better at preparing their students for their future. In the reading “The Banking Concept Of Education As An Instrument Of Oppression” by Paulo Freire, he believes that teachers are depositing information into their students. He states that there are two educational systems, the “banking concept” is when teachers are filling their students up with information but the students aren’t fully understanding the material. On the other hand, the “problem posing concept” is when the teacher lets the students communicate with each other. It opens the classroom to a learning environment. Especially when students are more comfortable enough to ask the teacher a question. Esentionally he prefers the problem posing concept. Futhermore, “Social Class and The Hidden Curriculum Of Work” by Jean Anyon an educator at Rutgers University, Newark. She researches how students of different economic backgrounds are interacting with school work and teacher interaction in their elementary schools. Also, she supports her research by looking at the various ways public schools provide particular types of knowledge and educational experiences of the different social classes.
“Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor. Instead of communicating, the teacher issues communiqués and makes deposits which the students patiently receive, memorize, and repeat” (Freire 213).
The banking concept is “ a gift bestowed by those who consider themselves knowledgeable upon those who they consider to know nothing'; (Freire 213). The goal of the ‘banking’ concept is to deposit as much information into the students as possible. This results in disconnected memorization without the real understanding and discouragement of creative thought.They cannot think for themselves. As Marx writes, just as there are two types of learning, ‘banking’ and problem-posing, he explains that society is this way also. There is the upper class and subordinate classes. They both struggle for economic and political power and the primary way the upper class keeps its power is through their beliefs and values. They are allowed to think. The subordinate classes believe they are subordinate due to the upper classes prestige and way of thinking. Like Freire’s ‘banking’ concept, education is the way to keep students down and this works because the students accept all knowledge from the teacher, just like the dominant class in Marx’s ideology, keeps the subordinate classes submissive.
In the Freire’s “the banking ‘banking’ concept education.” he interpreted that teacher deposit themselves contains reality to students, and take the concept as if reality although it is far away from our life. This kind of education model led students to adapt the world, but not judges the world personally. T The capability of banking education to minimize or annul the students’ creative power and to stimulate their credulity serves the interest of the oppressors, who care neither to have the world revealed nor to see it transformed (Freire, Pg.217). The process of teacher’s teaching just an information transition, this act make students away from real life and world. Hence, banking education makes people apart from praxis. Apart from the way to be a fully human being in the real
Freire believes that the “more completely they accept the passive role imposed on them, the more they tend simply to adapt to the world as it is and to the fragmented reality deposited in them” (73). Percy claims that this dependency stems from the belief that “sovereignty [must be] surrendered to a class of privileged knowers” (54). Freire believes that due to this loss of sovereignty, the ones with authority attempt to “indoctrinate[e] them to adapt to the world of oppression” (78). Consequences begin to mount as students begin to mold into the world of oppression. Freire’s strongest belief is that, due to the banking system, a student simply becomes “the possessor of a consciousness: an empty ‘mind’ passively open to the reception of deposits of reality from the world outside” (75). This mentality causes students to become constricted thinkers, or mindless robots, only letting the engineer program predetermined ideas that the engineer deems them fit enough to know. “What has taken place,” claims Percy, “is a radical loss of sovereignty” among the students because in the way education is currently being utilized, educators perceive that knowledge can simply be placed into students, however, this method is sorely inhumane
Through this essay I am going to try and show the advantages of “problem posing” style to education. In my opinion this style of education is very effective in expanding the minds of the receiver by making them more interactive in their learning rather than the typical lecture and take notes. In this style of education people teach each other and the teacher is not the only one enlightening the class with their knowledge. I cannot only speak this opinion from my own experiences, but also others who share in the same view sculpted by their experiences. The two authors whom I used for a base of my point of view are Paulo Freire and Richard Rodriguez. Freire wrote the essay called “The Banking Concept of Education,” in which Freire shows how “problem posing” education is the most effective way to teach and be taught at the same time. Rodriguez wrote the essay call...
The Banking Concept of Education, revolves around the concept that education and the teacher, student dynamic is supposed to indoctrinate the teacher into believe they are only meant to teach, and that the student is only meant to learn. Friere describes the teacher as a depositor of knowledge into a receptacle, the student without really going into complex details in a way that’s detached from
In Paulo Freire’s essay “The Banking Concept of Education” he talks about how in education there is no conversation between the teachers/professors and their students. In this essay there are a few points I do disagree with, such as that there are some class in which there cannot really be any conversation or discussion, for example mathematics cannot be disproven because there are theorems and concrete facts, so teachers and professors have to teach for memorization. Another reason I disagree with Freire’s way teaching is because in the banking concept Freire is against when teachers are just telling students things and they are regurgitating them, but some students learn better using memorization for learning in the class room and also when studying. The next point I disagree with in Freire’s essay is he doesn’t really look at it from the teachers stand point, because in the United States at least the teachers are now forced to only teach certain points in their subject because of all the standardize testing that they now have in place, specifically grade school. The last thing in Freire’s essay that I disagree with is how he seems to kind of put down teachers.
Education is the core of humanity and its teaching has been mistreated. Based on Paulo Freire’s theory, education has been torn apart from its truthful purpose. It is now used to alienate human beings instead of promoting unity. Throughout this chapter, Chapter 2 in Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed, he concentrates in the teacher-student relationship in classrooms. He sees education as information that is being passed on or “banked” from teachers to students. This is what Freire refers to his concept of “banking education”. He also introduces numerous examples and other diverse concepts in his philosophy; for example, his proposition to confront the “banking” concept, the problem-posing education. Therefore, there is no need to search any further for what Paulo Freire illustrates as evident. Education is in crisis and it is up to the people in society to decide if they want to change it or not. Dropouts, illiteracy, violence and drug abuse in schools are some of the realistic reasons that prove the poverty of educational systems. Our society can benefit from Paulo Freire’s philosophy of education because the proposal he presents, problem-solving education, allows Puertorricans of all social classes to develop certain critical abilities which could, at any time, be used to defend themselves in any kind of social, political, or cultural environment. A method based on identifying, analyzing and taking action upon all kind of problems has to be developed in order to become liberated.
Initially, through my pursuit of knowledge in the Bahamas for more than 12 years, I experienced a more liberating education that Freire depicts as problem-posing education. During this experience, where I was given a poem entitled "Dulce Et Decorum Est." in which the object of the assignment was to analyze the poem and interpret its meaning. Rather than the teacher asserting their ideas onto me, I was able to discuss with her and other classmates my interpretation of the poem. The interaction between the teacher, my peers and me created a “liberating education.”(p. 262) Freire would view this as problem-posing education because it stimulates the interaction and consciences of the mind, allowing me to form my own ideas. Problem-posing education is the best style for educating our Bahamian students because “it rejects communiqués and embodies communication.”(p. 262) In my case,...
The second chapter described the "banking" approach to education in which Freire suggested that students were considered empty bank accounts and that teachers were making deposits into them and receiving nothing back. The banking concept distinguishes two states. In the first, the educator cognizes a cognizable object and prepares a lesson. During the second, he expounds to his students about it. (67) Freire argued that the underclass could be empowered through literacy. He also pointed out that education could be used to create a passive and submissive citizen, but that it also has the potential to empower students by instilling in them a "critical consciousness." (45) Freire wanted the individual to form himself rather than be formed.