Pearl Harbor Speech Rhetorical Analysis Essay

1177 Words3 Pages

“No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might will win through absolute victory” (Eidenmuller). The person who said that is the author of the “Pearl Harbor Speech” is President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. This speech came the day after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. President Roosevelt was in his third term as the president of the United States. Steve Job gave a commencement speech to the Stanford graduating class of 2005. He was a college dropout, but he is the founder of Apple and Pixels Productions. Roosevelt uses strong pathos and few logos to get congress and the citizens of the United States on his side for getting into war with Japan, in contrast with Steve Job’s strong logos in his commencement speech. Throughout his speech, Roosevelt uses emotional appeal or pathos to get his audience’s attention. The most famous line in this speech is “…a date which will live in infamy…” (Eidenmuller). He is trying to persuade the people of the United States, and the Congress that we need to declare war on Japan. Franklin Roosevelt is reciting himself throughout the speech by saying …show more content…

Roosevelt and Jobs both used certain words in their speeches to set the tone in their speeches. They also used repetition to make their key points stand out. They had different reasons for giving their speeches, but they both tried to convince their audience to be on their side. It shows how arguments in speeches have not changed over 60 years. They both organized their speeches the same. They started with addressing their issue, then they used all of their appeals in the middle of their speeches, and closed with their resolution to the issue they were speaking about. Steve Jobs could have used more statistics to support his claim. Roosevelt could have shown how many people Japan killed during their

Open Document