Paul Bliss Case Summary

553 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Sexual harassment and its effects

Article 1 The article “CTV News anchor Paul Bliss suspended following sexual misconduct allegations” discusses, how “an award-winning CTV reporter and anchor, has been suspended pending an investigation into allegations made Friday by a former network employee of sexual misconduct more than a decade ago.” (Isai, 2018) The article also discusses how Bridget Brown decided to publish the news and why she finally decided to come out it after 12 years of being silent about it. Similarities There are two similarities between this article by Thestar and case study 2. The first similarity is both Paul Bliss and Dr. Smitherson are being suspended indefinitely until their investigations have been completed. The second similarity is they were both able to go under the radar of the allegations made against them quite a long time. Paul Bliss was able to keep his sexual misconduct charges quiet for almost 12 years, while Dr. Smitherson has known about his HIV for an extended period as he has been on regular medication and attends regular medical visits. Differences …show more content…

The first difference is Paul Bliss’s suspension was made public due to the nature of his job and that Bridget Brown came out about what happened on a blog post (social media). While Dr. Smitherson’s suspension was kept quiet and it stayed internal to the people working in the hospital because if word got out about Dr. Smitherson it could affect the hospital. The second difference is that in the article it does not say if CTV is implementing a solution in their work environment. Whereas in the case study the board of directors at the hospital wants to implement that everyone who works in the hospital has to take an HIV test immediately and all new applicants must undergo that

Show More
Related

  • Andrew Keegan Case Summary

    752 Words  | 2 Pages

    The court will likely hold that Andrew Keegan’s (“Mr. Keegan”) actions were a product of a law enforcement officer in influencing his conduct therefore establishing an entrapment defense.

    Read More

  • Is Lying Bad For Us

    543 Words  | 2 Pages

    One day while doing his job, a physician used a used swab that was possibly infected with HIV on another patient. When looked at by certain people, the doctor did the correct thing by telling his patient that he roused a swab on him/her. However, the chances of this patient getting HIV was substantially low, and he should have waited for the patient to develop symptoms, which would have been rare, before telling the truth. As stated by Michael Greenberg, “he might have done better by keeping his mouth shut.” If the doctor did lie, he could have lied to protect himself, the quality of life of the patient, and his ability to help others with their lives. If he had not told the patient that he used the swab on him/her, he/she would not have had to live in fear of getting HIV. Because of this decision of truth telling, the doctor lost his job, money, confidence, and also affected someone’s quality of life.

    Read More

  • response paper

    539 Words  | 2 Pages

    The movie “Philadelphia” shows our society in the workforce and the discrimination that can take place because of an illness or sexual orientation. In this movie Andy Beckett, a fully competent Philadelphia lawyer, is fired from the firm wheeler & Co. because he has AIDS and because he is homosexual. According to the statutes, the American with Disabilities Act, it is unlawful for an employer to fire an individual because of a terminal illness such as cancer or in this case AIDS. Moreover in the movie Andy was diagnosed with HIV, and he does not tell his supervisors in the firm for his sickness and that he is homosexual. However this does not impede the man’s performance, and if the illness does not impede in the performance in the job, the employer has not reason to fire you. Which in this case is not true because more often the law and morality are not one and the same. For example in the movie Charles Wheeler, the senior partner who assigned Andy a very important case in which a very important letter of that case was misplaced, so they accused Andy for that incident and they also ...

    Read More

  • Angelo Herndon Case Charles Martin Summary

    308 Words  | 1 Pages

    Charles Martin reviews a controversial court case of the 1930s in regards to the legal system of the South. Originally, Martin wrote the Angelo Herndon Case and Southern Justice as a doctoral dissertation; however, he continued his writings and research to publish his writings into a book. Published by Louisiana State University Press in 1976, The Angelo Herndon Case and Southern Justice depicts the dynamics of the South as the Communists influence increased creating a basis for biracial coalition, which opposes the racial interaction in the South. With use of primary sources and great detail, Martin accurately portrays the inequality within the justice system of Southern state for African Americans and the fear of Communism by reviewing the

    Read More

  • HIPPA Violation: A Case Study

    235 Words  | 1 Pages

    Mount Sinai St. Luke’s sued following HIPPA ViolationThey’re being sued for faxing patient PHI to his employer, a reported HIPPA violation that has already resulted in an OCR HIPPA settlement. St. Luke’s impermissibly disclosed PHI of two identified patients when Spencer Cox staff members faxed one individual’s PHI to his workplace and the other individual’s PHI to an office at which he volunteered. The type of PHI involved was specifically information about HIV, AIDS, and mental health. They say the impermissible disclosures was breached. Despite admitting its wrongdoing and paying the government $387,000, they’re also getting sued for negligence and negligence infliction of emotional distress. Because the individual had not told the majority

    Read More

  • Charlie Davis Case Summary

    934 Words  | 2 Pages

    Should Charlie Davis cover for Alex Adams mistake of not locking up the restaurant because they are best friends and Adams needs this job? This ethical issue conflicts between the principles of role duty and egoism. Role duty is knowing and acting according to your specific duties as a professional and carrying out your job description. While egoism is “me first” and it promotes one’s own best interest over anyone else’s. In this ethical issue, Davis’s role duty is conflicting with Adams’ egoism. Charlie Davis has his own job that he needs to worry about and fulfilling his duties as followed in his job description while conflicting with Alex Adams’ egoism. Alex Adams just wants to protect his own job, even though he didn’t fulfill his duties that ultimately may have led to robbery, rather than tell the truth to his boss like he should.

    Read More

  • Tuskegee Syphilis Case Study

    1514 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1932 the U.S Public Health Services (USPHS) started an experiment in Macon County, Alabama, to determine the natural course of untreated, latent syphilis in black males. For those whom might not know syphilis, is a chronic bacterial disease that is contracted chiefly by infection during sexual intercourse, but also congenitally by infection of a developing fetus . Leaving syphilis untreated might lead to life threating problems or death. The problem with this study is that the USPHS voluntarily made the decision to deny 400 syphilitic black males treatment as well as endanger 200 healthy uninfected men. The USPHS lied to these men by telling them they were receiving free special medical treatment for “bad blood,” a term used locally to describe someone with syphilis. But in reality they had to endure spinal taps done without anesthesia to study the neurological

    Read More

  • Discussion To Nursing: An Introduction To Professional Nursing

    710 Words  | 2 Pages

    The term “justice” has a wide variety of definitions but, in the nursing world it is an ethical principle that is defined as: the equal and fair distribution of resources. No matter who they are, every person has the right to any and all means of medical treatment (ANA, n.d.). In order for justice to be achieved, a patient should be given fair, impartial care and having their rights as a citizens upheld (Feinsod & Wagner, 2008). Although the in knowledge of AIDS and its disease processes have grown exponentially over the decades, there are still cases of discrimination against those infected with the disease.

    Read More

  • Steve Harmon Case

    526 Words  | 2 Pages

    Is Steve Harmon innocent or guilty you decide. Steve Harmon is put on trial of the murder of Mr. Nesbitt and the robbery of his drug store. During the trail Steve Harmon is seen as guilty by the prosecutor Sandra Petrocelli. The witness Allen Forbes testimony proves that the gun used in the murder was registered under Mr. Nesbitt. This helps prove that the gun was used in the murder and the robbery and the gun was later found in the store. This witness helped me prove that Steve Harmon could have used the gun to kill Mr. Nesbitt or had taken part in the robbery at some point in the crime. “I went around behind the counter and I saw Mr. Nesbitt on the floor—there was blood everywhere and the cash register was open. A lot of cigarettes were

    Read More

  • James Batson Case Summary

    409 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the U.S there is unfortunately a history of racial discrimination and injustice, including unequal treatment of minorities legally. In the case of James Batson, a man is fighting for representation of his community to reflect in the jurors who will decide his fate after a crime he has committed. It is not an easy task to appeal court decisions, and it is an even more difficult one when trying to prove mistakes in the legal system. Is it coincidence or is there really something at stake when considering race in the criminal justice system.

    Read More

  • Ethics and Law in Dental Hygiene: Case Studies 16 and 17

    1560 Words  | 4 Pages

    This case presents a very delicate situation that presents many legal and ethical questions. Do you tell your brother his partner has HIV? I would tell my brother, but the how and when, may vary based on circumstance. From a professional ethical standpoint, it would be unethical to disclose the patient’s HIV status without consent. It would violate the patient’s right to confidentiality, as it is the patient’s choice whom information may be shared with (Beemsterboer, 2010, p. 50). It could also be argued that it is a violation of the principle of nonmaleficence. By providing the patient’s HIV status to people unbound by HIPAA, you are putting the patient at risk of discrimination. This could cause mental anguish or psychological issues, therefore, in essence, inflicting harm on the patient. The most valued application of nonmaleficence is, “One ought to not inflict harm” (Beemsterboer, 2010, p. 42). This would outweigh the ethical argument that you are also preventing harm to your brother, another less important application of nonmaleficence (Beemsterboer, 2010, p. 42). There is one professional ethical principle that I would argue was being applied. This being the principle of paternalism, stating that healthcare providers should do what they deem best for the patient according to their ability and judgment (Beemsterboer, 2010, p. 47). If the patient had a sexual encounter with the brother, and did not inform him of her HIV status, she may be arrested for reckless endangerment according to Pennsylvania law. A case where an HIV-positive person did not disclose their status to their sexual partner was brought before the Pennsylvania Superior Court. According to Pennsylvania law, “Disclosure of HIV status is a defense ag...

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Phillip Jablonski Case

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ethically, I feel all the psychiatrist involved should have done a little more investigating into Phillip Jablonski background. Mr. Jablonski and Ms. Kimball informed Dr. Kopiloff that Jablonski served five years in prison for raping his wife and four days prior to attending the session he attempted to rape Kimball’s mother. I feel this information alone deserved a little more attention from Dr. Kopiloff because Jablonski is definitely displaying a pattern of his lack of respect for women and violating your personal space. Another issue which should have brought up red flags and gave Dr. Kopiloff cause for concern is the fact that the police described the same situation to Dr. Berman who failed to relay the message to Dr. Kopiloff. The level of urgency regarding the safety of others and their clients at this hospital does not seem to be high. Ethically, Dr. Berman and Dr. Kopiloff should have formally informed Kimball of their concerns regarding Jablonski’s recent, current, and vague and uncommunicative demeanor. Both doctors were formed not only by local police also the client himself of his violent tendencies and they still were reluctant to act, and only suggested Jablonski voluntarily hospitalized himself.

    Read More

  • Gabriel Fernandez's Case Study

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    The difficulty I had with this case, was I had multiple sources to turn to for information. I had to choose which source was reliable because I did not want misconduct information. The media sources had about the same variety of information about Gabriel’s case, but added small details that the alternative networks did not include. For example, each news network added more information on how Gabriel was found by the paramedics. The L. A. Times reported that Gabriel had a cracked skull and three broken ribs while the Huffington Post did not include this information. The L.A. times also elaborated more on the story by reporting more facts about who was involved in the investigating. They included names of teachers, and police officials that was involved. The differences between how news network presented the facts in the case proved the different ways we are influenced by the media, and the information we gather depends on where we get our stories

    Read More

  • An examination of how Sherlock Holmes' abilities and techniques,

    822 Words  | 2 Pages

    of women, but I have not heard him do it of late" (A Scandal in

    Read More

  • Paul Cronan

    2666 Words  | 6 Pages

    This case involves a corporate response to AIDS in the workplace. The return to work of Paul Cronan, a person with AIDS, after a much publicized law suit, led to a walkout of his coworkers. This case documents the circumstances which preceded the work stoppage. Analyzing this case from Paul Cronan’s supervisors point of view there are three main ethical issues to be considered: duty to protect the interests of the company, New England Telephone (NET); obligation to maintain the rights of the other employees; and duty to provide for the safety and privacy of Paul Cronan.

    Read More

More about Paul Bliss Case Summary

Open Document