Passivity Vs. Deliberate Wrongdoing: A Poisonous Cup Of Coffee

441 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on concept of justice and theories of justice

Sahara Lewis Ms. Stav Ap Lang & Comp 17 September 2016 Passivity Vs. Deliberate Wrongdoing: A Poisonous Cup of Coffee Argument In the excerpt, A Poisonous Cup of Coffee, it notes that either Tom or Joe is more wrong than the other by listing the moral dilemma. “Tom puts poison in his wife’s coffee, thereby killing her…Joe’s wife mistakes poison for coffee cream, Joe being the only one who can save her lets her die.” Do you think doing the action or watching the action has a much greater effect? Some people may argue that watching the action is much worse than actually doing the action. While doing the action has a greater effect than watching the action, the rules for murder whether you watched and didn’t do anything or actually did the crime, the law for murder should be enforced. …show more content…

Many of these key points all in which comes down to the laws being enforced. People who feel that watching the act has a more negative effect than doing the act would argue that Joe’s scenario would cause less jail time because he did not place hands on her. My opinion on the dilemma is that actions speak louder than words. With that being said I feel that Tom’s case has a greater effect than Joe’s because he contributed more in the crime. Statistics shows that a hands-on crime would have more evidence that would help solve the crime. While those who feel that Joe’s situation has a greater impact than Tom’s, the opposite opponent would have the same opinion that our murder rate needs to decrease. However, just because a person did not lay hands on the victim, it does not excuse them from the consequences. The benefit of the dilemma is that the news is open to the public and murderers are getting off of the streets and creating a more workable society. By this being said, it is a step closer to a safe rule-following

Show More
Related

  • Comparing James Rachel's Article 'Active And Passive Euthanasia'

    834 Words  | 2 Pages

    Between on what action we take (harming), and what we fail to do (failing to help). I think there is no difference in between doing someone harm and allowing it to happen. At the end, the intentions were the same. Nesbitt might say that killing someone is worse than letting someone die but the fact is that motives were the same, a killer verses bystander killer. It is claimed that if a doctor personally kills a patient and a doctor who withholds a treatment that results in death, they are both responsible for two

    Read More

  • Canadian Serial Killer: Robert Pickton

    749 Words  | 2 Pages

    A society that presumes a norm of violence and celebrates aggression, whether in the subway, on the football field, or in the conduct of its business, cannot help making celebrities of the people who would destroy it. Unfortunately, such acts of rampage have become a prevalent factor in the Canadian culture. As a result of endless media coverage, Canadians now are constantly bombarded with numerous images of violence. Many of which often portray a victim avenging their opponent by means of force. Thus, indoctrinating a nation of individuals to believe that it is only through aggression that problems can be resolved. Rather than being punished for acts of violence, those who commit such offenses are often praised for their “heroism”. In addition, the success of films like The Godfather, Gladiator, and Troy further aid in reinstating the fact that we live in a society that praises violence. Furthermore, this ideology allows for individuals to partake in violent acts with little or no backlash from ones community. However, when an individual strays away from the “norm”, they are likely to then be viewed as a deviant. Such cases of rejection within a society, are often seen in the portrayal of serial killers. Although our society tends to condone violence when it is directed towards a specific individual(s), it does not allow the killing of innocent bystanders. Instead, crimes that are targeted against a number of people over a long period of time, entail the harshest forms punishments under the law. Sadly, in executing the law for said crimes, those in charge often face much public scrutiny. Such occurrences were apparent in the faulty murder investigations of Canada's most notorious serial killer Robert Pickton. This is due to the ...

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Oj Simpson

    2308 Words  | 5 Pages

    RELATED MURDER TRIALS: Making A Murderer: The Case For And Against Steve Avery And Brendan Dassey

    Read More

  • The Perils Of Indifference

    838 Words  | 2 Pages

    Do you think that indifference is evil? This is the controversy that Elie Wiesel has brought to the world's eyes. Indifference is evil because it can cause harm not only to others, but to them themselves.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Sex Offenders

    1497 Words  | 3 Pages

    The offender in both situations fantasizes, schemes, and determines how they are going to commit the crime all the while getting a great excitement from the whole process, from the planning to actually going through with the crime itself. He also states that for a rapist, “He spots his target,

    Read More

  • Sentencing of Juveniles

    2565 Words  | 6 Pages

    ...ny high profile issue, and in this case we are dealing with the lives of young offenders, many of which claim their age excuses their "mistake." While society must recognize the issues that often fuel adolescent rage, we should be hesitant to withhold punishment. In death row cases, many inmates will reside on death row for more than ten years before being executed. During this time, they undergo many changes, both physically and psychologically and often feel like a different man, and certainly not a violent threat to society. Moreover, we are not executing men (and women) for the people they have become, but for the crime they committed. Their victims did not receive a second chance, so why should we as a society grant convicted killers the chance to live, love, and grow? However, the death penalty must be examined for flaws, including incorporating DNA technology whenever possible. Age has obviously been an important factor in the debate over the death penalty, but we must realize we live in an age of violent school shootings and declining alternatives for misplaced youth. Society should not advocate the death of innocents, but vindicate a willful and deliberate loss of life.

    Read More

  • Analysis on Jeff Lindsay's Darkly Dreaming Dexter

    1538 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Darkly Dreaming Dexter, Jeff Lindsay presents Dexter Morgan, a serial killer who kills only criminals, and in doing so, generates controversy about what constitutes morally justifiable behaviour. Lindsay’s protagonist blurs the lines between right and wrong, exposes the inherent flaws of justice systems, and ultimately forces the reader to evaluate his or her principles. While many North Americans believe that murder is unquestionably evil, I disagree on the basis that this stance overlooks the need to take into account the circumstances of the situation—such as who the victim is, who has committed the murder, and why he or she has done so—which are crucial factors in passing moral judgement on an offender’s actions. I argue that Dexter is correct to channel his sociopathy into something positive—disposing of individuals who have committed atrocious crimes in a vigilante fashion—because North American justice systems are incredibly flawed, as they allow heinous criminals to walk free too often due to prevailing social biases, systematic loopholes, and lack of manpower. Dexter compensates for this defect because, unlike justice systems, he eliminates criminals without prejudice towards the offender or the victim, operates on a straightforward basis free of political rigmarole, and achieves results in an efficient fashion, all of which make North American society a safer place, save lives of would-be victims, and spare their families mental anguish. Ultimately, this reveals that the line between what is right and wrong is not as clear as one might initially think, as well as the troubling notion that North American institutional structures are in need of reconstruction if readers are more confident in justice delivered by a ...

    Read More

  • Edward Koch Death Penalty Analysis

    1581 Words  | 4 Pages

    Edward Koch, who was former mayor of New York, wrote an article about one of the most controversial talks called the death penalty. This controversial topic questions if it is right to execute a person for a crime committed or if it is wrong. He made the point that the death penalty is good, in order to conclude that murderers should be punish with this penalty. He was bias in most of the passage, yet he tried to acknowledge other people’s opinion. In this article, Koch gives his supports to the idea to convict a murderer with death penalty by using a tone of objectiveness, shooting for the individuals who opposes his position to be the audience, and have a written form of conviction for the audience.

    Read More

  • Child Witnesses

    999 Words  | 2 Pages

    Bischoff, L.A. & McCarty M. (2011). Dayton Daily News: Murder Then Rush to Judgement. Retrieved 2-27-12 from http://www.daytondailynews.com/dayton/content/localnews/daily/080606elkins1.html.

    Read More

  • Rising Murder Rate Analysis

    430 Words  | 1 Pages

    The argument made by Thomas P., is that the murder rate has been going up a lot the last couple years and the United States is not handling it right. Thomas P. argues that the government is trying to cover up how big of a deal the rising murder rate is. In this passage he writes, “ In 2016, there were 17,250 homicides, an increase of more than 8.5 percent from previous year.” That's a tremendous increase in homicides in just one year. In the passage he suggests that we need a new national dialogue. In this dialogue they will go more with evidence rather than blaming. Another idea of his, is that instead of trying to control drugs, poverty, culture and guns we should focus on controlling the small

    Read More

  • Social Contradictions in Fyodor Dostoyevsky's Notes from the Underground

    968 Words  | 2 Pages

    as distinct advantages of the. These things should be in ones self-interest, society says. If someone says, rapes another person, they are not acting in their own self interest. They run the risk of feeling guilty, guilt is not conducive to happiness. They run the risk of being thrown into jail.

    Read More

  • The Difference Between Killing And Letting Die

    988 Words  | 2 Pages

    590). Therefore, Nesbitt claims there is a moral difference between killing and letting die. Nesbitt argues the difference thesis: that killing is morally worse then simply letting someone die (Nesbitt, p. 590). Nesbitt uses claims against Rachels to argue that in fact that killing is worse than letting die. Nesbitt states, "It would be generally accepted, I think, quite independently of the present debate, that someone who is fully prepared to perform a reprehensible action, in the expectation of certain circumstances, but does not do so because the expected circumstances do not eventuate, is just as reprehensible as someone who actually performs that action in those circumstances" (Nesbitt, p. 591). With this being said, someone who is prepared to do a wrong action in expectations of something, but does not do so because the expectations do not occur as a result is just as wrong as someone that performs the wrong action. Yet, Nesbitt claims that this does not provide strong enough evidence that letting someone die is as blameworthy as killing someone. Lastly Nesbitt states, "[W]hich is to say that killing is indeed morally worse than letting die" (Nesbitt, p. 593). Altogether, Nesbitt opposes that there is no moral differences between killing someone and letting

    Read More

  • Pro Capital Punishment Speech

    1084 Words  | 3 Pages

    It was midnight when it all happened. Tom Peterson was sleeping in bed next to his wife after a tiring day at work, while his two little daughters slept in the next room. Suddenly he was violently awakened by the terrified screams of his wife only to get a glance of a huge man standing over him with a butcher's knife. Tom was stabbed thirteen times, one of his daughters was killed and his wife was severely injured. Now, the Peterson family has just exited the supreme court of justice in which the judge has condemned the murderer of their little girl to the death penalty, for as it turns out the Peterson family had not been the first victim of this murderer.

    Read More

  • My Experiences with Unethical Behavior

    930 Words  | 2 Pages

    Much of our lives we are faced with situations where we come across the opportunity to make ethical and unethical decisions or opinions. We come across difficult people who live their lives unethically. Do we allow them to influence us? Do we become transparent and lose ourselves when it seems as though everyone is doing something that is morally wrong? I for one, do not give in to this peer pressure.

    Read More

  • Heinz Dilemma Case Study

    709 Words  | 2 Pages

    Life threatening situations can be some of the most difficult situations that one can go through. During these types of situations moral lines can be blurred in such ways that what one may think is right for that situation is not actually a moral solution that one should do. In the case of the Heinz dilemma what is verses what isn’t moral is a hard decision to make. In the case of Heinz I feel personally that there were two wrong-doings that were done in order that one right-doing could be achieved. The shop owner was in the wrong for over pricing a drug and refusing to help Mr. Heinz ailing wife, but at the same time Mr. Heinz was in the wrong for stealing from the drug dealer. At the same time he was only forced into that situation due to

    Read More

More about Passivity Vs. Deliberate Wrongdoing: A Poisonous Cup Of Coffee

Open Document