Pass Fail Ron Riorgley Summary

1492 Words3 Pages

Why The Essay Pass/Fail Fails Itself The essay “Pass/Fail” by Ron Srigley has valid points and claims within the essay, however, the use of hasty generalization, and appeal to emotion heavily undermine the valid claims of the essay. The claim that universities need to stop treating themselves as businesses and start acting like academic organizations, to better both themselves and students. However, the hasty generalization with the topic of technology and the appeal to emotion undermine the essay’s valid points by making the essay more about the way the author is being ‘attacked’.

To begin with, there are valid points made. For starters universities need to stop considering themselves as businesses and stop putting business first, and …show more content…

The issue with this essay is the way it handles its negative views. It’s handles in a very black or white situation with only negative views being shown, ”Entertaining, and successful participation requires no real effort and no real accountability. Serial use of YouTube clips, Prezi presentations, films, and “student-centred learning activities” continues to be peddled for pedagogical relevance (Srigley),” depicted in the essay, technology is the big scary monster going after and attacking the teacher and making his students ignore him, and inconveniencing his everyday life, ”That’s when I understood that there were several entertainment options available to students in the modern university classroom, and that lectures rank well below Twitter, Tumblr, or Snapchat (Srigley)” The essay also attacks online courses without showing the positive side to them. Shown in the essay, they are worth nothing and teach nothing, ”online courses are perhaps one of the most complete expressions of the denigration of university education (Srigley),” there is no good side of online classes shown. There is nothing to show how online learning is making learning accessible,”work online with no direct support from a faculty member. Digital lectures for live classes with real students? Sounds expensive. How about no lectures, no students, and, best of all, no professor (Srigley).” Overall, if the essay were to show the second side of technology as a whole, the argument against technology within the essay would be stronger, and appear to be more of an argument based in logic, rather than a person who refuses to come to the reality of the times and just attacks technology for this failure to understand

Open Document