Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
chernobyl disaster summary in 400 words
chernobyl disaster summary in 400 words
chernobyl disaster summary in 400 words
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: chernobyl disaster summary in 400 words
The third part of this book is the essential element of this form and function argument. It is entitled “Part Three: Amazed by Sadness”. This section of the novel explores the facts and takes a more serious and analytical tone about the incident. For example, one section within this part of the novel is entitled “About the Facts”. Vasily Nesterenko, the former director of the Institute for Nuclear Energy at the Belarussian Academy of Science tells about his reaction to the incident, and he includes more facts than we have seen thus far in the novel. He talks about how he tried to call the the First secretary of the Central Committee, but no one would listen to him. Desperately, he insisted that no one should be within 100 kilometers of Chernobyl, but his findings …show more content…
The rest of his passage explains why no one knew what was actually happening: the government did not want to cause a panic. Not to mention, no one truly knew how bad the situation at Chernobyl was. There was a complete lack of information and science available. This passage alone within the greater whole of part three summarizes the situation. There was in fact information available, albeit very small amounts of information; there were steps that the government could take to prevent more people from being exposed to the radiation. However, they did not do anything to help. These facts and figures were all missing from the first two sections of the novel, and for good reason. The people being interviewed did not know these facts. The majority of them did not even know what radiation was. By removing these facts and placing them at the conclusion of the novel, we see the events at Chernobyl unfold in the same manner in which they did in real life. Indeed, it has now become clear that Alexeivich was creating a form to match the function of the
The engineers in Visit Sunny Chernobyl created a new frontier past the safety zone because they want to test the limits of the reactor. What the scientists didn’t account for is that fact that the reactors already had the potential of a dangerous chain reaction. (Blackwell 6) Consequently, their boundary destroying led to catastrophic consequences and the total annihilation of a land area because of massive radiation. Blackwell thought Chernobyl was so horrific he expressed that no one should visit without a “working understanding of radiation and how it’s measured” (Blackwell 7). These are some horrific consequences that followed from surpassing the
Imagine working with radioactive materials in a secret camp, and the government not telling you that this material is harmful to your body. In the book Plutopia: Nuclear Families, Atomic Cities, and the Great Soviet and American Plutonium Disasters by Kate Brown, she takes her readers on a journey to expose what happened in the first two cities that started producing plutonium. Brown is an Associate Professor of History at University of Maryland, Baltimore County. She has won a handful of prizes, such as the American Historical Association’s George Louis Beer Prize for the Best Book in International European History, and was also a 2009 Guggenheim Fellow. Brown wrote this book by looking through hundreds of archives and interviews with people,
Petryna, Adriana. "Chernobyl's Survivors: Paralyzed by Fatalism or Overlooked by Science?" Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67.2 (2011): 30-37. Print.
Lewis, H. W. (1986). The Accident at the Chernobyl' Nuclear Power Plant and Its Consequences. Environment, 28(9), 25.
"What Are the Social and Economic Costs of the Chernobyl Accident?" GreenFacts. Web. 19 Mar. 2011. .
...re were so many people killed and mutated from the blast and the radioactive chemicals. As a country we (the United States) say that nuclear weapons should not be used, yet we are the only country to have ever used nuclear warfare. Think if the United States was the country hit instead of Japan. Everything would be different and the United States would not be the country it is today. Frank shows the scenario of the U.S getting hit in the Cold War. Frank also shows the struggle that would ensue to survive and rebuild from what is left.
Gould, Peter. Fire in the Rain: The Democratic Consequences of Chernobyl. The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, 1990.
...he destitution and demoralization of the citizens of Petrograd. Andrei, the character with the most honor and virtue, still finds ruin because of his affiliation with the immoral politic. All morality is beaten out of the characters with the most potential for it by the dire circumstances of their lives. An excellent, emotionally moving story, this novel leaves no doubt as to the author's feelings about the path of destruction down which socialism leads.
This text provides a historical account of the development of the atomic bomb and nuclear fission. It provides insight into the function and effectiveness of the Manhattan Project, as well as the destruction of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This book illustrates human determination, the ability to perform during times of crisis, and again brings up the question of morality and human
Chernobyl was the greatest nuclear disaster of the 20th century. On April 26th, 1986, one of four nuclear reactors located in the Soviet Union melted down and contaminated a vast area of Eastern Europe. The meltdown, a result of human error, lapsed safety precautions, and lack of a containment vessel, was barely contained by dropping sand and releasing huge amounts of deadly radioactive isotopes into the atmosphere. The resulting contamination killed or injured hundreds of thousands of people and devastated the environment. The affects of this accident are still being felt today and will be felt for generations to come.
For my Historical Investigation, I wanted to research the catastrophic nuclear meltdown that occurred on April 26th, 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine. My research question is: Could the Chernobyl disaster have been avoided, if so, which moments in the chain of events leading to the accident needed to occur differently? To carry out my investigation, I plan on utilizing the Internet, encyclopedias and finding books that explain how accidental Chernobyl really was, the variety of mistakes made by the Ukrainians, as well as the Soviets, and how these problems could be fixed in accordance to the time period. I will use Chernobyl, global environmental injustice and mutagenic threats by Nicholas Low and Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl from Adriana Petryna for references that can help me in my investigation. Hopefully, with accurate analysis and innovation my research will teach the world of its past so this disaster doesn’t occur in the future.
A regular city that workers are grateful to work at has become an apocalypse in an instant. Above all, several people have died and the effects on survivors stay with them forever, physically and mentally. Concerning this, the explosion in Pripyat is one sight of “a vision perhaps of what the whole world might look like [if] people just [disappeared]” and that “Chernobyl does not belong to the past; its power will never die. Chernobyl is forever” (“Chernobyl: The Catastrophe That Never Ended”). Similar to 9/11, the people like Andrey Glukhov have “‘[called] it 26, which [is] the date of the accident’” (Chernobyl: The Catastrophe That Never Ended”). This incident lives in people’s minds where just as the radiation, can never leave them. Despite this, it is a lesson to remember and engineers move forward with previous disasters in mind not to allow another destruction to
Flanary, W. (2008). Environment effects of the Chernobyl accident. Retrieved November 1st, 2013 from /http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/152617
Are you a wildlife lover? Chernobyl has different food chains than normal food chains. There are many different types of animals in Chernobyl. The animals are not normal animals they are radioactive. The animals of Chernobyl make me mad because these animals shouldn’t have gotten hurt.
“Snow” is a short story in first person narration, told by the main character. Set during a time when people lived in fear of nuclear fallout. Instructions were often reiterated in school and on the radio about how to react when seeing the flash. This nuclear fallout setting lends itself to intrigue and suspense; it is intensified by the use of the narrator. The narrator, a young girl, gives the reader a perspective of child like understanding and, a limited understanding. The main character’s mind is full of nuclear fallout lessons, one after another in class. The main character, which has never seen snow before, sees it begin to snow outside the school window. The girl cries out, “Bomb Bomb”, terrifying the teacher and other students (85). As other girls in the class begin to cry the teacher reassures and explains to the main character what snow is and, that there is no bomb. If the author of Snow had told the story from an adult’s point of view, maybe the teacher’s, the story would lack believabi...