Paper Menagerie Analysis

1033 Words3 Pages

Fantasies can bring us closer to or farther from someone we love. Sometimes, these fantasies can be joyful daydreams, but other times they can be delusions keeping us from a harsh truth. In Ken Liu’s "Paper Menagerie", a young boy named Jack creates imaginary friends from origami that his mother folds for him. In Bobbie Mason’s "Shiloh" we see a less literal fantasy that symbolizes something quite real. Leroy, a husband in a failing marriage, ignores the truth of their failing marriage by constantly imagining building a house and by ignoring any signs that there may be a fissure growing between him and his wife. In "Paper Menagerie", Jack’s make-belief world of paper animals brings him closer to his mother, who cannot speak to him due to a …show more content…

In both short stories, two people who originally love each other end up with one person distancing themselves the other. In one we see a fantasy holding a relationship together and in the other we see it mediating a relationship falling apart. Thus it can be seen that in both cases, fantasies and illusions are not the surest way to hold together a bond between two people. While a fantasy is sometimes something supernatural and impossible, meant to bring someone joy, it can also be less literal of a fantasy and more symbolic. In the case of "Paper Menagerie" Jack’s fantasy of paper animals is quite literal. When his mom creates an origami tiger for him, he imagines “Its tail [twitching], and it [pouncing] playfully at [Jack’s] finger” (Liu, 65). Since his mother cannot speak the same language …show more content…

In "Shiloh", Leroy even realizes that “It was clumsy of [him] to think Norma Jean would want a log house. It was a crazy idea.” (Mason, 16). He understands that their marriage is falling apart because of their fantasy. Jack comes to a completely different realization: that the fantasies he had were keeping him and his mother together. At the end of the book he is read a note from his mother that shows him how much she loved him and how much him not talking to her hurt her. His mother says why she taught him Chinese: “I would teach you my language, and we could together remake a small piece of everything that I loved and lost” (Liu, 76). The mom does not learn English and her son ends up being the only person she has. The only way she can even talk to her son is by teaching him small bits and pieces of chinese and by making him paper animals. When Jack wants to fit in, as all humans do, he abandons the animals and tries his hardest to act like a true white American. Without the Origami he essentially stops being able to love his mom entirely. She can no longer share any of her culture with him because he is revolted by it. Whether it was her fault or not, his mother was not able to learn English or integrate into the society that Jack had to become a part of. When Jack stopped playing with his paper animals, he stopped talking to his mother, since they could not understand each other. She could

Open Document