Pantheon Vs Parthenon Essay

425 Words1 Page

Introduction
In this week’s assignment I will make a comparison and description of two famous buildings: Pantheon and Parthenon. They are both ancient temples, but built in different periods and with different purposes. Both temples went through (natural and human) catastrophes that damaged their architecture, but fortunately they were repaired (or at least partially).
Discussion
The Pantheon building was built around 113-125 A.D. in Rome, with the purpose of worshiping their gods and today is being weekly used by the Roman Catholic Church. Its columns are characterized by the Corinthian style (8 in the front and 4 in the pronaos) and the medium of this building are many, like marble, granite, concrete and brick. The round shape of the building makes it unique and which is the most unreinforced concrete dome and the largest. This temple went through different periods and served as an inspiration for so many other architects and artists. The temple used to have steps on its entrance, but now its ground level. The church also added details to increment the interior of the temple, putting statues, high altars, paintings and even tombs. …show more content…

in Athens, with the purpose of serving the goddess Athena, and today is a museum. The Parthenon’s columns (8x17) are characterized by the Doric style, where the columns fluted and have no base. Getting to the pronaos (front porch) of the temple, you can find six other columns and this is also where you could find the cult statue. On the back entrance, opisthodomos, you could also find six other columns, and this area was used as a treasury. Even though the Parthenon temple in general is considered Doric, there are ionic features in this building like: the frieze around the building in a continuous pattern and “four columns supporting the roof of the opisthodomos” (The Parthenon,

Open Document